Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 11:36 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 11:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [43]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [8]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [4]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE:Engineering (Investment Banking)
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 488 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: underrepresentation of people over age 65 [#permalink]
3
Kudos
sushma0805 wrote:
International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are underrepresented in the government of Country X. Because the government sets the country's policy priorities and passes new laws, the underrepresentation of people over the age of 65 results in a significant lack of consideration for issues important to this age group, such as pensions, age-related welfare, and employment discrimination; only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem.

Which of the following best describes an assumption implicit to the international policy adviser's argument?

(A) A significant increase in the size of Country X's government would be required in order to increase the representation of people over the age of 65 in the government.>>> Let say there are 4 people over the age of 65 in a government of 9 officials, we need to have only 1 person to overcome under representation>> So a significant increase is not necessary.
(B) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would result in an increase in the consideration for issues affecting people in this age group. >>> Negate this assertion and the argument falls apart. Negation :A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would NOT result in an increase in the consideration for issues affecting people in this age group
(C) A significant increase in funding toward educating the government about issues affecting people over age 65 would result in more serious consideration for issues affecting people in this age group.>>> Not mentioned >> Out of scope
(D) A significant increase in funding for adult education targeted to people over age 65 would result in an increase in the number of such people in Country X's government.>>> Not mentioned >> Out of scope
(E) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would have to precede any increase in the number of high-ranking government officials who are over the age of 65. >>> Not mentioned >> Out of scope.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 93 [3]
Given Kudos: 78
Send PM
International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
3
Kudos
I want to second Bombsante and Montyyy95 posts. Could someone explain the gaps between the conclusion [increase the numbers of officials] and [increase the consideration for people over 65] i.e. why is A wrong?

Thanks!!

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [2]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Premise: There are less number of people in the government of country X who are over the age of 65. This causes significant lack of consideration for issues important to this age group

Conclusion: Only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem.

Looking to fill the bridge between premise and conclusion, one can assume that increase in number of people over age 65 in the government would actually result in increase in the consideration of issues for this age group. Otherwise the conclusion, falls apart. Hence choice B is right.

KUDOs please :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2018
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 180 [2]
Given Kudos: 342
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
2
Kudos
GMATNinja karishma Why is option B correct ?
There is a GAP on how the increase in Govt size ---->will affect the Lack of consideration for Issues of people >65...
and underpinning the argument is the causal relationship: under representation of people >65 leads to lack of consideration of their ISSUES

How does the increase in representation of Govt officials --> leads to increase in consideration of these issues... closes the gap or why this has to be ASSUMED ?
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: underrepresentation of people over age 65 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
"only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem"...
i was closing the loop hole in this conclusion, and marked ans A and thought B is already stated in the argument.

thanks !!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 234
Own Kudos [?]: 510 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Answer is (B) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would result in an increase in the consideration for issues affecting people in this age group.

Since people over the age of 65 are underrepresented in the government, their issues are not resolved. So only C provides option to resolve this.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 138
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [2]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Isn't B already stated in the question stem?

"the underrepresentation of people over the age of 65 results in a significant lack of consideration for issues important to this age group"

How can it be the assumption? Isn't assumption an unstated evidence?

Please help!!!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V33
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Premise : significant underrepresented population aged over 65 leading to lack of considering issues faced by them.
Conclusion: increase in number of government officials will solve the problem.
Assumption:increase in representation leads to consideration of the issues faced by them (solution)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Posts: 120
Own Kudos [?]: 298 [1]
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
WE:Brand Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hello, I am still not clear about the OE for choice B.

People over the age of 65 are underrepresented in the government of Country X. The underrepresentation of people over the age of 65 results in a significant lack of consideration for issues important to this age group; only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem.

IMO conclusion is only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem i.e. the author wants us to believe that if the number of govt officials will increase the number of people over the age of 65 will also increase in the govt thereby increasing the representation of this age group and hence the consideration for this age group (second underlined part of the story is an assumption implicit in the argument).

Choices C, D & E can be easily eliminated. However, I am struggling really hard to eliminate choice A. Is it because choice A does not mention anything about the consideration?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 92 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: underrepresentation of people over age 65 [#permalink]
Straight B.

when you negate B, argument is weakened.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Nov 2016
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
obvious its B no doubt. They are making policies without any consideration for anyone.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 169
Own Kudos [?]: 991 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
since the source is not clear, but the question has been bookmarked many times, I think the question is correct.
(A) A significant increase in the size of Country X's government would be required in order to increase the representation of people over the age of 65 in the government. -> A only concerns the requirement of the increase of the representation.
(B) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would result in an increase in the consideration for issues affecting people in this age group. -> causal effect and relationship
(C) A significant increase in funding toward educating the government about issues affecting people over age 65 would result in more serious consideration for issues affecting people in this age group.
(D) A significant increase in funding for adult education targeted to people over age 65 would result in an increase in the number of such people in Country X's government.
(E) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would have to precede any increase in the number of high-ranking government officials who are over the age of 65.
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
sushma0805 wrote:
International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are underrepresented in the government of Country X. Because the government sets the country's policy priorities and passes new laws, the underrepresentation of people over the age of 65 results in a significant lack of consideration for issues important to this age group, such as pensions, age-related welfare, and employment discrimination; only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem.

Which of the following best describes an assumption implicit to the international policy adviser's argument?


(A) A significant increase in the size of Country X's government would be required in order to increase the representation of people over the age of 65 in the government.
Change in the composition might also help rather than increasing the size

(B) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would result in an increase in the consideration for issues affecting people in this age group.
This is a valid assumption therefore let us hang on to it

(C) A significant increase in funding toward educating the government about issues affecting people over age 65 would result in more serious consideration for issues affecting people in this age group.
how the funding affects is thoroughly out of context doesn't impact the passage

(D) A significant increase in funding for adult education targeted to people over age 65 would result in an increase in the number of such people in Country X's government.
Similar reasoning as C

(E) A significant increase in the representation of people over the age of 65 in Country X's government would have to precede any increase in the number of high-ranking government officials who are over the age of 65.
Any level increase in representation is fine it need not be high ranking therefore out

Theref/ore IMO B
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2021
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
Isn't option B directly stated in these lines "only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem."

The problem is underrepresentation.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2107
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
Premise: People over the age of 65 are underrepresented in the government of Country X. Because the government sets the country's policy priorities and passes new laws, the underrepresentation of people over the age of 65 results in a significant lack of consideration for issues important to this age group, such as pensions, age-related welfare, and employment discrimination;
Conclusion: only an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem.

There are two gaps:
1. conclusion talks about increase of number of government official (not necessarily people of age > 65). So here assumption is 'increase in government officials will lead to increase in number of people (>65 years of age) in the government'.
2. increase in representation is assumed to increase in consideration of the problems.


Choice A: gives the assumption in the point 1.
After negating Choice A, it means there may be some other way of increasing the representation of people with age >65 in the government. There may be some other way of increasing consideration of old age issues.
So the conclusion "ONLY an increase in the number of government officials will solve the problem", breaks down.
Choice B: gives the assumption in the point 2.
After negating choice B, it means increase in representation would not lead to increase in consideration of problems. This also breaks the conclusion.

I am not able to negate Choice Based on this analysis.
Please explain where I am going wrong.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17205
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne