Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Feb 2016, 18:06
GMAT Club Tests


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Interview with Wharton 'former admissions officer'

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 755
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Interview with Wharton 'former admissions officer' [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2006, 09:27
GMAT Wisdom from an Admissions Consultant
This week, we want to share with you a conversation we had recently with Graham Richmond, a former admissions officer at Wharton who now works at Clear Admit, an admissions consulting firm.

ManhattanGMAT: Do schools care if you take the GMAT more than once?

Graham Richmond: In a nutshell, no. To elaborate, though, it depends on the context. If your first score is significantly below a school's reported average, it doesn't make sense to take the exam only once. It sends a message to the school that you're not realistic and you don't have the drive to succeed. If you have to take the exam two or three times to get the score you need to be competitive, that's OK. If you take it more than that, schools may begin to look askance. Also, be careful of cancellations. One cancellation is understandable. Perhaps you were sick or had other problems in your life. Multiple cancellations, however, look bad in the eyes of an admissions committee.

ManhattanGMAT: Let's say one applicant scores a 700 on her first official GMAT exam. Another applicant fails to hit 700 on her first official exam but achieves this score on her second attempt. Does the admissions committee look at these two applicants differently?

Graham Richmond: From an admissions perspective, no.

ManhattanGMAT: What if your score is actually lower on the second attempt?

Graham Richmond: It's a little difficult to assess a situation like that out of context. But an admissions committee would probably view the higher score as the more accurate gauge, even though the lower score is more recent. There are many reasons that someone could do less well on a subsequent attempt: personal or physical problems, for example. And even if the second attempt produces a lower score, the mere fact that the applicant took the exam again can show the committee that the applicant is driven and determined.

ManhattanGMAT: If an applicant takes the exam more than once, will schools take the better quant subscore and better verbal subscore if they're from different exams? For example, if on the first try someone gets 45Q and 35V and the second time 42Q and 40V, will a school take the 45Q and the 40V?

Graham Richmond: The only school I'm aware of that will split up scores like that is the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. All other schools I know will take the higher overall score, even if there's a similar pattern to what you described.

ManhattanGMAT: What is the point of the Analytical Writing Assessment (the essay section) of the GMAT?

Graham Richmond:The Analytical Writing Assessment was added to the GMAT to give business schools a way to test applicants' "natural" writing abilities. The essays they receive with your applications have probably been reviewed by friends, colleagues, perhaps even an admissions consultant. But the essays you write during the GMAT are ostensibly a better indication of how well you write on your own, since you can't receive any help with them. Keep in mind, however, that they are not the biggest factor in a committee's evaluation of your application. Schools will want to see scores of 4 and higher on the essays, but this is a minor variable in your overall package. Most schools don't even read the essays; they simply look at the score.

ManhattanGMAT: How do admission committees verify one's GMAT score?

Graham Richmond: During the main evaluation of an application, we at Wharton relied on the self-reported scores listed in the application itself. After we made a favorable decision on an applicant, an intern would check the self-reported score against the official score report to make sure they matched. Also, if you take the GMAT again after your submit your application, it's your responsibility to inform the schools that they should take the new scores into account, since they will have only the older score report to work with at that point. You can also use your application to explain to a committee that you're willing to take the exam again if your score is deemed too low.

ManhattanGMAT: What are some recent trends in business school applications?

Graham Richmond: After record numbers of applications from 1999 to 2001, we saw a drop-off in 2003 and 2004. But GMAC reported this year that the number of test-takers has increased in 2005, so that will probably translate into more applications, which means there will probably be tougher competition for seats in business schools. We've also seen a pretty steady increase in the average GMAT scores of top schools. From 1997 to 2005, we've seen a jump from an average score of about 680 to an average score of 716 at Wharton and 712 at Harvard. It's hard to say why scores have gone up since the CAT format was introduced in the late 1990's. It may be that people are now spending more time preparing and studying for the exam.

ManhattanGMAT: Does the round in which one applies make a difference to one's chances of admission?

Graham Richmond: Yes. It gets harder to pass muster as the rounds go on. Especially in the third round. Basically, each round is considered a separate applicant pool, but by the third round, many of the places have been filled and you really have to stand out in order to get yourself noticed. It's much better to submit your application in an earlier round. Stanford, for example, admitted only 4 applicants in its third round recently. Sometimes schools wait list applicants in earlier rounds to see how the class is shaping up before making a final decision on them, so in the third round you're competing not only against new applicants, but also against wait listed ones.
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1415
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2006, 11:42
interesting article, but nothing really shocking :wink:

the only thing I wonder is the last point regarding the fact of which round you apply... 3rd round is impossible??? is it only for top 10/top15 :?:

the schools I want to go to (not the top 15) are saying that first and second rounds are better, but it's very possible to get in the 3rd as well... nothing like 4 seats in the 3rd round... any thoughts?
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2304
Schools: Darden
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 451 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2006, 22:15
That's an interesting article. I guess schools appreciate it if people persevere to achieve what they need (a score that will gain the admission).

I would have been interested to see his answers to some questions regarding how the admissions committee looks at various GMAT scores. For example, every admissions committee says that they read each application fully, etc., but if at a certain score Wharton just skims and rejects. Do they really fully read the entire application when it contains a 450? I also wonder (for personal reasons I guess :wink: ) if there is a specific score where applicants are treated more favorably. For example, I have heard that some schools set aside applications with 750+ scores to be read separately. It would be nice to know if this is just a rumor or if there is some truth.

It's always most useful to get information from people that actually know the real facts. Thanks for posting the article.
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1173
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 00:27
What is revealed is not secret. What is secret won't be revealed.
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2304
Schools: Darden
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 451 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2006, 00:32
This guy isn't keeping secrets. He's a former admissions officer who now works for an admissions consulting firm.
  [#permalink] 20 Sep 2006, 00:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Experts publish their posts in the topic Admissions Interview Question iPen 1 05 Jul 2015, 08:42
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic 690 to Wharton GMATPill 8 17 Apr 2012, 06:44
Interview experience mayashrin 1 08 Oct 2011, 02:04
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Early Admissions and Rolling Admissions post2pras 6 21 Jan 2010, 12:07
Done in Day Admissions Interviews nb 0 04 Dec 2007, 09:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Interview with Wharton 'former admissions officer'

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: bagdbmba, WaterFlowsUp

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.