Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 06:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Posts: 263
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2011, 19:43
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (01:00) correct 21% (01:08) wrong based on 105 sessions
Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting some coins as “extremely rare” when in fact those coins are relatively common and readily available.

XYZ Agent: That is ridiculous. XYZ Coins is one of the largest coin dealers in the world. We authenticate the coins we sell through a nationally recognized firm and operate a licensed coin dealership.

The XYZ agent’s reply is most vulnerable to the criticism that it

(A) exaggerates the investigator’s claims in order to make them appear absurd
(B) accuses the investigator of bias but presents no evidence to support that accusation
(C) fails to establish that other coin dealers do not also authenticate the coins those dealers sell
(D) lists strengths of XYZ Coins while failing to address the investigator’s charge
(E) provides no definition for the inherently vague phrase “extremely rare”


[Reveal] Spoiler: Doubt
I eliminated D because the XYZ agent give the "facts"...they aren't really the strengths of the company...i mean it can be a mandate for such industry type to sell coins through recognized firm...and hence chose E by POE.

Someone pls help me understand option D
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 422
WE 1: Business Development
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 161

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: Coins!! [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2011, 02:54
DeeptiM wrote:
Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting some coins as “extremely rare” when in fact those coins are relatively common and readily available.

XYZ >>> Misleading

XYZ Agent: That is ridiculous. XYZ Coins is one of the largest coin dealers in the world. We authenticate the coins we sell through a nationally recognized firm and operate a licensed coin dealership.

XYZ >>> Not misleading >>> we make sure our coins are authentic.

So we can very clearly notice that speaker A is talking about something and speaker B is disagreeing but talking about something completely different.


The XYZ agent’s reply is most vulnerable to the criticism that it

(A) exaggerates the investigator’s claims in order to make them appear absurd
No exaggeration at all between A and B
(B) accuses the investigator of bias but presents no evidence to support that accusation
No accuses. Only connection between them is - "That is ridiculous".
(C) fails to establish that other coin dealers do not also authenticate the coins those dealers sell
Out of scope.
(D) lists strengths of XYZ Coins while failing to address the investigator’s charge
Sounds good. speaker B is talking in favor of XYZ and he is talking about different things than speaker A.
(E) provides no definition for the inherently vague phrase “extremely rare”
Out of scope. He is talking about something completely different. besides, speaker B never talked about extremely rare and in this question he does not have to.

[Reveal] Spoiler: Doubt
I eliminated D because the XYZ agent give the "facts"...they aren't really the strengths of the company...i mean it can be a mandate for such industry type to sell coins through recognized firm...and hence chose E by POE.

Someone pls help me understand option D

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2049
Followers: 125

Kudos [?]: 873 [0], given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: Coins!! [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2011, 03:36
DeeptiM wrote:
Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting some coins as “extremely rare” when in fact those coins are relatively common and readily available.

XYZ Agent: That is ridiculous. XYZ Coins is one of the largest coin dealers in the world. We authenticate the coins we sell through a nationally recognized firm and operate a licensed coin dealership.

The XYZ agent’s reply is most vulnerable to the criticism that it

(A) exaggerates the investigator’s claims in order to make them appear absurd
(B) accuses the investigator of bias but presents no evidence to support that accusation
(C) fails to establish that other coin dealers do not also authenticate the coins those dealers sell
(D) lists strengths of XYZ Coins while failing to address the investigator’s charge
(E) provides no definition for the inherently vague phrase “extremely rare”


[Reveal] Spoiler: Doubt
I eliminated D because the XYZ agent give the "facts"...they aren't really the strengths of the company...i mean it can be a mandate for such industry type to sell coins through recognized firm...and hence chose E by POE.

Someone pls help me understand option D


Your doubt is justified but I see D as the most appropriate answer choice indeed.

First of all, for Bold Face CR, method of reasoning and parallel reasoning questions, the range of the words may vary a great deal but still can be considered relevant.

e.g. in "D", although FACTS may be mentioned, but those properties can be considered STRENGTHS as well. Even if that is a part of the law or is a mandate, you can't deny they are strengths at the same time. So, any synonymous words close to FACTS, STRENGTHS, EXTRAORDINARY TRAITS etc. could be considered correct to describe XYZ's rebuttal. The words in these types of question fall in a big spectrum, making the questions more difficult.

The later part of D:
"failing to address the investigator’s charge"

This tells us that the investigator's charge that the coins provided are not rare, but rather commonplace. XYZ doesn't refute this challenge at all. XYZ doesn't say anything such as:
The coins are unique and your theory is baseless and without evidence.
OR
The coins that available outside may look similar but are inherently different from what we provide, so our claim still stands.

"E" could be correct IF investigator said something like this:
XYZ Coins market its coins as "extremely rare" and trying to deceive the customers, for most customers don't actually understand what "extremely rare" actually means.

From the argument, it is clear that both parties agree on the usage of the word "extremely rare", a word neither of them thinks needed clarification.
_________________

~fluke

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Expert Post
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 123

Kudos [?]: 563 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Coins!! [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2012, 19:53
Expert's post
fluke wrote:
DeeptiM wrote:
Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting some coins as “extremely rare” when in fact those coins are relatively common and readily available.

XYZ Agent: That is ridiculous. XYZ Coins is one of the largest coin dealers in the world. We authenticate the coins we sell through a nationally recognized firm and operate a licensed coin dealership.

The XYZ agent’s reply is most vulnerable to the criticism that it

(A) exaggerates the investigator’s claims in order to make them appear absurd
(B) accuses the investigator of bias but presents no evidence to support that accusation
(C) fails to establish that other coin dealers do not also authenticate the coins those dealers sell
(D) lists strengths of XYZ Coins while failing to address the investigator’s charge
(E) provides no definition for the inherently vague phrase “extremely rare”


[Reveal] Spoiler: Doubt
I eliminated D because the XYZ agent give the "facts"...they aren't really the strengths of the company...i mean it can be a mandate for such industry type to sell coins through recognized firm...and hence chose E by POE.

Someone pls help me understand option D


Your doubt is justified but I see D as the most appropriate answer choice indeed.

First of all, for Bold Face CR, method of reasoning and parallel reasoning questions, the range of the words may vary a great deal but still can be considered relevant.

e.g. in "D", although FACTS may be mentioned, but those properties can be considered STRENGTHS as well. Even if that is a part of the law or is a mandate, you can't deny they are strengths at the same time. So, any synonymous words close to FACTS, STRENGTHS, EXTRAORDINARY TRAITS etc. could be considered correct to describe XYZ's rebuttal. The words in these types of question fall in a big spectrum, making the questions more difficult.

The later part of D:
"failing to address the investigator’s charge"

This tells us that the investigator's charge that the coins provided are not rare, but rather commonplace. XYZ doesn't refute this challenge at all. XYZ doesn't say anything such as:
The coins are unique and your theory is baseless and without evidence.
OR
The coins that available outside may look similar but are inherently different from what we provide, so our claim still stands.

"E" could be correct IF investigator said something like this:
XYZ Coins market its coins as "extremely rare" and trying to deceive the customers, for most customers don't actually understand what "extremely rare" actually means.

From the argument, it is clear that both parties agree on the usage of the word "extremely rare", a word neither of them thinks needed clarification.


Hii fluke. I have a little doubt regarding your explanation. Don't you think that XYZ agents denies the allegations by saying " That is ridiculous"?
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 40

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Coins!! [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2013, 03:33
Marcab wrote:
Hii fluke. I have a little doubt regarding your explanation. Don't you think that XYZ agents denies the allegations by saying " That is ridiculous"?


The agent doesnt back up his response with any facts related to the allegation.

"Extremely rare" cannot be compared to "size of the company" or "authenticity of coins" or "delearship".
_________________

Cheers!
Arvind

Re: Coins!!   [#permalink] 24 Aug 2013, 03:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills trainspotting 9 10 Jul 2009, 03:34
1 A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills marcodonzelli 6 12 Feb 2008, 05:11
An advertising agency argued that the quality of its client tarek99 4 28 Nov 2007, 11:22
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills gamjatang 5 07 Dec 2005, 07:19
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills rianah100 7 30 Nov 2005, 05:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Investigator: XYZ Coins has misled its clients by promoting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.