Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Aug 2014, 00:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Investigators concluded that human failure was not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 15 May 2011, 10:36
saorabh wrote:
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

OA in a while


The OA is C , i have confirmed , this is a question from LSAT set1 .

the question is clear enough ,
the conclusion is a cause and effect relationship i.e cause X-> effect Y.
but negating option C implies an alternate cause Z -> effect Y .
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 17 May 2011, 06:39
Agree with C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 272
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 17 May 2011, 18:31
Stuck between D and C
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2333
Followers: 245

Kudos [?]: 2104 [0], given: 680

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2011, 10:20
Expert's post
Re: LSAT CR-16   [#permalink] 21 May 2011, 10:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Investigators concluded that human failure was not vprabhala 10 22 Mar 2005, 14:22
Investigators concluded that human failure was not vprabhala 3 22 Mar 2005, 12:56
Investigators concluded that human failure was not RockGmat 12 11 Nov 2004, 18:01
Investigators concluded that human failure was not saurya_s 1 21 Oct 2004, 07:33
Investigators concluded that human failure was not dushver 22 25 Aug 2004, 08:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Investigators concluded that human failure was not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.