Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 08:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Investigators concluded that human failure was not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Investigators concluded that human failure was not [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 02:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

30% (02:28) correct 70% (01:35) wrong based on 25 sessions
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

OA in a while
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 18

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 04:10
D.

Since the number of reports have increased, mechanical problems may or may not have increased. Choice D is the right assumption. If airlines were more reluctant than earlier to report, then the increase in reports is not possible.
1 KUDOS received
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 93 [1] , given: 69

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 04:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
C


In short the arguments says: We have more stringent rules for identifying problems => problem reports increased by 50%.

But maybe the increase in reporting is not based on improved procedures? Maybe reason is the overall increase in number of problems?

Argument implies that the number of problems was the same and number of reports increased solely because of new rules. If this assumption does not hold then the argument is clearly faulty.

So for argument to be true the assumption (C) must hold.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 4

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 04:35
saorabh wrote:
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

OA in a while


My answer is E.

Conclusion is: reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.

Premise: new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect

We are looking for assumption which make conclusion clear.
A. out of scope
B. looks tempting for me (hold on)
C. tells nothing new - out
D. looks also out of scope
E. seems the best

Include E in logical scheme, and argument appears very nice.

Premise + Assumption = Conclusion
(Setting new rules for identifying reporting) + (By setting this rules, it becomes easier to detect mech problems) = The number of reports of mech problems has increased significantely.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 228
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 1

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 04:48
The arguments talks of increase in reported mechanical problems by 50 %. But all the reported mechanical problems may not be a mechanical problem. Some problems could be electronic or related to other areas but misinterpreted as a mechanical.

So Mechanical problems in airplanes should not increased by 50 percent

Hence IMO C
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 69

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 04:50
Quote:
My answer is E.



E is the general conclusion that could be made from argument, not the assumption
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 18

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 05:17
Yup C it should be.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 115
Location: USA
Schools: IU KSB
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 66

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 05:21
saorabh wrote:
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

OA in a while


My Choice is 'C'

Problems have not increased but the frequency of reports have increased.

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.

This assumption supports the conclusion that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August.
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 69

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 05:47
Seems like we'll need OE as well as OA...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 4

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 06:38
swatirpr wrote:
saorabh wrote:
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

OA in a while


My Choice is 'C'

Problems have not increased but the frequency of reports have increased.

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.

This assumption supports the conclusion that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August.



I think Investigator's conclusion is not the main.
I think the main conclusion is that setting new rules ACCOUNTS FOR increasing in reports.

But setting new rules dosn't merely mean that it becomes easier to detect the mech problem and therefore report about mech problem.

E seems the necessory assumption. Easier to detect --> more reports


(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
I find no at all how C could help the argument.
C states that mech problems could 1) remain the same 2) decrease by any % 3)increase by 30% or 70% (not 50%)


Need OA...
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 08:22
C it should be.

OA please..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 12:03
"D" for me. "C" talks about 50 % increase in mechanical problems while the argument talks about 50% increase in reporting mechanical problems.I don't see direct connection between these two things.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 19:39
I would go for C

OA....?
Expert Post
SVP
SVP
avatar
Status: Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1638
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Followers: 86

Kudos [?]: 490 [0], given: 432

Premium Member
Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 16 Nov 2009, 14:55
Expert's post
I think it is option C. The author believes that the recently reported problems already existed, but now they are being reported. These are pre-existing problems that, due to new regulations, have now been made official.

Oh, I can't wait for that OA!
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 2

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 16 Nov 2009, 23:36
C.

"The new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect".
C says confirms this.
_________________

http://www.online-stopwatch.com/
http://gmatsentencecorrection.blogspot.com/

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2009, 00:26
It should be C.

The stem says that "That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August." . So, it assumes that it's the "new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems" which is cause of 50% increase that we see and nothing else.

It falls into the category of "if A caused B, then "(assumed) nothing else was the cause of B""

what is OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 225
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 6

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2009, 08:58
I think it should be C.

E states that mechanical problems have become easier to identify. However, that's not an assumption that the statement makes. The new regulation for identifying and reporting mechanical problems could just have included more things that should be classified as mechanical problems then previously thought by pilots. The argument attributes the 50% increase of mechanical problems completely to the new regulation for detection. However, it's possible that there's an increase in the actual number of problems, so the answer should be c.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 437
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 16

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2010, 19:29
Please, what is OA?
_________________

Never give up,,,

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1364
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 10

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 15 May 2011, 05:09
negating C clearly crashes the conclusion.

C
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2039
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 953 [0], given: 376

Re: LSAT CR-16 [#permalink] New post 15 May 2011, 10:17
saorabh wrote:
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.


The author argues that the increase in mechanical problems report occurred because of the stringent rules regarding the reporting. However, it is perfectly possible that the increase in report occurred because of an actual increase in mechanical problems itself.

Ans: "C"
_________________

~fluke

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: LSAT CR-16   [#permalink] 15 May 2011, 10:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Investigators concluded that human failure was not rahulraao 16 15 Nov 2005, 15:41
Investigators concluded that human failure was not dipaksingh 3 05 May 2005, 23:38
Investigators concluded that human failure was not vprabhala 10 22 Mar 2005, 14:22
Investigators concluded that human failure was not vprabhala 3 22 Mar 2005, 12:56
Investigators concluded that human failure was not RockGmat 12 11 Nov 2004, 18:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Investigators concluded that human failure was not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.