Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 08:17
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [1] , given: 0

Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2007, 08:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (02:30) correct 46% (01:45) wrong based on 1220 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analyses of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients
B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 492
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2007, 10:49
I think I would go for answer B for this one.

The question asks which practice if used would hinder the long-term success, the biased opinion will do.

A is out of scope.
D is 180
C and E, I don't know how to explain those. I just don't like those.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 170
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2007, 11:44
A.

If managers solely engaged in raising capital are the ones determining the analysts' rewards, then the analysts' reports will always be favorable and thus always be biased.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 384
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2007, 11:47
plaguerabbit wrote:
A.

If managers solely engaged in raising capital are the ones determining the analysts' rewards, then the analysts' reports will always be favorable and thus always be biased.


This is A.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 111 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2007, 12:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
Quote:
"Analyses of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.


my vote is for A.

The last statement tells you what is needed to achieve long-term success. The question asks what practices, if followed, would hinder long-tern success.

Unbiased analysis = long term success
Biased analysis = hinder long term success
5 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 282 [5] , given: 0

Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2008, 22:00
5
This post received
KUDOS
23
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analysis of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients
B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 449
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 1

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 00:51
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
x97agarwal wrote:
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analysis of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients For long term success these recommendations should be unbiased , but managers engaged in raising capital will bias the analyst's opinions in their favor so this will hinder long-term success
B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client This will help long term success since reports will be unbiased.
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks Out of context
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators If analysts give unbiased reports then fine
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions out of context


Will go with A)
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1575
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 2

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 04:16
i had it down to A or B, and chose B ... i thought that using the analyst's reports constituted an unbiased point of view ?
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1569
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 245 [1] , given: 0

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 04:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
I will go with C. This option will hinder long term growth.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 371
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 08:48
Close call between A and B. I'll go with B to be safe.

A - does not indicate that mangers will act unbaised or in the best interest of the client.
9 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 169
Location: Berkeley, CA
Schools: Berkeley-Haas MBA
WE 1: Investment Management (fund of funds)
WE 2: Private Equity ($2bn generalist fund)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [9] , given: 7

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 09:05
9
This post received
KUDOS
Clear A for me.

What hinders long-term success: Analysis of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success

so if the analyst's opinion is biased, this will be detrimental to banks.

if managers from the capital raising side bias the opinions of analyst, this will not be good.

A states exactly that.

in B, the channel of flow is the other way. Managers in the capital raising side will be using the work of analysts and no indication of biased opinions of analysts is apparent here.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 7

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 09:21
x97agarwal wrote:
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analysis of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients
B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions


IMO B, you should not mix and match the analysis. Do independent analysis for raising the capital and for clients intrested in investing
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

Re: cr; Investment Banks [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2008, 14:00
OA is A
Current Student
User avatar
Status: #TeamFuqua
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 123
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 580 Q37 V32
GMAT 2: 570 Q36 V32
GMAT 3: 680 Q44 V40
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 205

GMATPrep - Investment banks often have conflicting roles [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2013, 10:42
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analyses of companies' financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank's analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients
B. Using reports by the investment bank's analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts' current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions

Any thoughts on how to parse the question and relate it to the answer options?
_________________


-MBAJunkie

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 53

Re: GMATPrep - Investment banks often have conflicting roles [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2013, 10:50
Already discussed in the following thread:
investment-banks-often-have-conflicting-roles-they-67971.html
_________________

Do not forget to hit the Kudos button on your left if you find my post helpful 8-)

Collection of some good questions on Number System

Current Student
User avatar
Status: #TeamFuqua
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 123
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 580 Q37 V32
GMAT 2: 570 Q36 V32
GMAT 3: 680 Q44 V40
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 205

Re: GMATPrep - Investment banks often have conflicting roles [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2013, 10:56
ah good! Thanks...hopefully this will bump it for people to retry ..:)
_________________


-MBAJunkie

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 365
Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 282 [1] , given: 45

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2014, 04:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
Evaluate question.

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients OK - Rewarding the bank's analyst would compromise the report's integrity; not rewarding the bank's analyst would ensure the report's integrity.

B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client Using the reports would allow for greater transparency than would hinder the bank's long-term success.

C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks Sharing the risk among banks would allow for long-term success and not hinder it.

D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators Ensuring conflict are carefully mediated would allow for long-term success and not hinder it.

E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions Determining the value of predictions would allow for long-term success and not hinder it.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 916
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 676 [0], given: 322

Premium Member
Re: Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2014, 21:23
(A) and (B) are strong contenders.

But not convinced why (B) is rejected.

When we know that analysts are sending unfavorable reports, we know that on the basis of these reports only the bank will take a decision as to how best to raise a capital for a client. So, it would be erroneous to act on the basis of the reports sent by analysts since the reports are not genuine.

I know (A) is strong too since when you evaluate analysts based on recommendations of managers handling raising of capital. We can assume that the managers are corrupt and both the analysts and the managers are working against the success of the bank.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Struggling with Investment banks making a wrong decision [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2014, 06:09
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analyses of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients
B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions

I took following approach.

Structure:
IBs sometimes help companies raise capital and sometimes don't. If the IB needs to succeed, then analyses needs to be un-biased.

Pre-thinking.
Anything that shows that the practice is biased, leads to the right answer.

With this, I chose the answer B. OA is A.
Could you help me understand this?
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3033
Followers: 768

Kudos [?]: 6342 [0], given: 991

Re: Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2014, 09:27
Re: Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They   [#permalink] 31 Jul 2014, 09:27

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 38 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
GMATPrep - Investment banks often have conflicting roles MBAjunkie16 0 27 Oct 2013, 10:56
1 The First Banking Group s decision to invest in an PUNEETSCHDV 6 03 Sep 2012, 08:43
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They stevegt 0 29 Sep 2016, 05:08
CR- Analysts of Investment banks dvtohir 7 25 Apr 2007, 09:30
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They ttanvir 2 11 Dec 2006, 13:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.