Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The ques is asking Is .n68<1/n and not for what value of n.

It should be E. Please correct me if i am wrong.

I go with B. The statement only works with B and the question is asking if we have enough information to answer the question. Since with B we know that n=1 we plug that back into the question and find that 0.168 is indeed less than 1 and sufficient to answer the question. Hope this helps.

I go with E.
Putting 1 & 4 in eqn 1 gives two different answers.
similarly, putting 1 & 4 in eqn 2 gives 2 diff answeres.
so It can't be answers even combining them together. _________________

If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z, X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut.
Albert Einstein

if n=0 the expression goes to infinity which is indeterminate.

For this question we should infer that n is a number from 1 to 9. The fact that 1/n is included in the stem has precluded the possibility of n=0. For GMAT remember if something appears in the denominator, it is non zero. However, if you see something like n*0.n68<1, you cannot devide both sides by n while assuming n is non-zero. _________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

In fact, in the decimal represtentation of a number, n is a positive integer from 0 to 9.

If the second statement is true, n=1. For n=0 the expression is nonsense, because you cannot divide by 0.

Note that in evaluating the sufficiency of the first statement you have to consider the case n=0, because n<5 does not exclude this possibility. Whereas, in evaluating the sufficiency of the second statement, you haven't to consider n=0, because for n=0 the hypothesis you should assume to be true would not be verified.