Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

can I prove it using algebra and not picking number ?

is j-k > k-j / jk i.e. (j-k) - [(k-j)/jk] > 0 , is [jk(j-k) - (k-j)]/jk > 0 , i.e is[ jk(j-k) + (j-k)]/jk > 0 , i.e. is [(J-K)(JK+1)\ JK > 0

from 1

-1<jk<0 JK not = 0

i.e jk is -ve fraction, now to evaluate the question we ve ( jk+1) +ve and jk -ve , and thus we need to know j, k individually to evaluate (j-k).... no enough info ... insuff

can I prove it using algebra and not picking number ?

j-k > \frac{1}{j} - \frac{1}{k} equals \frac{jk(j-k)-(k-j)}{jk}>0 don't divide by jk because it could be 0 this is true if N+ and D+ or N- and D-

1. jk> -1 D could be -ve or +ve, no info about N. Not sufficient 2. -1< k< j j-k>0 and k-j<0 Num= jk(+ve)-(-ve) jk could be +ve or -ve , Not sufficient

1+2 The numerator is jk(j-k)-(k-j) and from 2 we know that j-k>0 and k-j<0 so Num= jk(+ve)-(-ve)= and the Den is jk> -1. Pick jk>0: Num>0 [(+ve)(+ve)-(-ve)>0] Den>0 so the answer is YES pick -1<jk<0: Den<0 and there are no douts here, but what about the N? is N=(-ve)(+ve)-(-ve) a negative number? it depends, we cannot say. E _________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Basically the question boils down to : Is (j-k)(1+jk)jk>0.

From F.S 1, we have (1+jk)>0. Thus, we have to answer whether (j-k)jk>0. Also for jk>-1, we could have both j,k>0; both j,k<0 or j,k of the opposite signs.Insufficient.

From F.S 2, we have (j-k)>0. Thus, we have to answer whether (1+jk)jk>0. This is possible only if jk>0 OR if jk<-1. Insufficient.

Taking both together, we know that both (1+jk) and (j-k) are positive. Thus, we have to answer whether jk>0. Just as above, Insufficient.

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...