Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

From 1: 2a – b < 7 AND |2a – b| < 7 WHERE 2a -b > -7 2a – b < 7 BUT |2a – b| > 7 WHERE 2a -b < -7 INSUFFICIENT

to confirm this you can find values of a & b that satisfy the condition 2a – b < 7 but provide different answers for |2a – b| < 7 ? A: a = 3, b = 0 2a - b = 6 - 0 = 6 6 < 7 and |6| < 7 B: a = -10, b = 1 2a - b = -20 - 1 = -21 -21 < 7 but |-21| > 7

From 2 you can refactor the original question: Is |2(b + 3) - b| < 7? => is |b + 6| < 7? This is true for -13 < b < 1 but false for value outside of this range. Again INSUFFICIENT.

Together, we can further combine in a similar manner as above to see that b + 6 < 7 so we find that b < 1, but we still don't know if b > -13.

So together is INSUFFICIENT.

Again, to see that this is the case, you can substitute numbers that satisfy both 1 & 2, but give different answers to the main question:

A: a = 3, b = 0 2a – b < 7 : 2a - b = 6 - 0 = 6 < 7 a = b + 3 : 3 = 0 + 3 |2a – b| < 7 ? : |6| < 7 TRUE

B: a = -20, b = -17 2a – b < 7 : 2a - b = -40 - (-17) = -23 < 7 a = b + 3 : -20 = -17 + 3 |2a – b| < 7 ? : |-23| < 7 FALSE

See there lies your fallacy.. Both can be possible so it is NOT possible ( SUFFICIENT) to answer conclusively. Had there been some other condition outlining that 2a-b is always greater than 0 , then it would have been SUFFICIENT. Right now as it is stands , it is ambiguous.

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Since my last post, I’ve got the interview decisions for the other two business schools I applied to: Denied by Wharton and Invited to Interview with Stanford. It all...

Marketing is one of those functions, that if done successfully, requires a little bit of everything. In other words, it is highly cross-functional and requires a lot of different...