|
Author |
Message |
|
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
19 Oct 2009, 21:38
Guys, desperately need your advice on whether I should retake the test. I just ended up with 710 (47;38). Q47 is 78%. I am planning to apply to relatively quantitative programs such as Master in Finance/Financial economics. As far as I know they pay special attention to percentile of quant scores and in one of my preferred schools the expected percentile is 90%. By the way, I asked adcom whether my score is sufficient and they replied that if I can get closer to 90% that might increase my chances for the interview, however this is not their requirement. Should I left it as it is and concentrate on other parts of my application or should I retake the test. The application process is already started so I dont have much time for preparation. I believe that I can shoot for Q49 (87%) which is close to 90%, but my verbal score will remain in the same range of +/- 1. So, I foresee that my total score will not change dramatically and will not jump to 760/770 which would be expected after retaking from 710. Probably I will end up with total scores of 730 max. Does it worth time and efforts? Just to evaluate my chances with current scores here is my profile: Female, 24 years from Kazakhstan Major: Economics from leading local university (GPA 3.96) Experience: 3 years in corporate finance and valuation in Big4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2998
Followers: 48
Kudos [?]:
391
[0], given: 210
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
19 Oct 2009, 22:52
For a Masters in Finance at Princeton you need about 50. Not sure about the other programs - Princeton is probably the most selective of the lot. Verbal score of 38 should be fine for most programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2528
Followers: 41
Kudos [?]:
365
[0], given: 19
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
19 Oct 2009, 23:02
bsd_lover wrote: For a Masters in Finance at Princeton you need about 50. Not sure about the other programs - Princeton is probably the most selective of the lot. Verbal score of 38 should be fine for most programs. I think BSD is correct. Q50 is very helpful for "MS in Finance at Princeton", which is probably the best in the category.
_________________
Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 12
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
12 Nov 2009, 16:48
I spoke with recruiters from Vandy, Washington St. Louis, BC, Tulane, etc last week at a local event. In general, they look for quant scores over the 80 percentile. However, your GMAT score might be strong enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 30
Schools: Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, MIT, Vandy, Boston College, IE, Illinois, Villanova
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
03 Dec 2009, 11:17
Your probably set for Vandy/villanova.
But for a school like Princeton, you will not have a shot with that low of a verbal. Just look at their most recent class, they're a group of math/engineering PHD's
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 14
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
29 Dec 2009, 20:32
Hi MFINDreamer,
Can u help me in deciding the schools to which I should apply to for Masters in Finance. I am looking at US and UK schools. Here are my details: Indian CItizen GMAT: 720 (Q49, V39) Work Exp: 3.5 years (1.5 years od International(US) exp) Most of the exp is in IT working as a Business Analyst and the current exp i.e. around 6 months is with a Big US based Bank in India and they are into capital financing.
Will really appreciate ur help.
Thanks Grv
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 30
Schools: Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, MIT, Vandy, Boston College, IE, Illinois, Villanova
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough? [#permalink]
30 Dec 2009, 15:06
Glad to help.
GMAT and work experience checks out at pretty much every program, although quant could be a bit higher. Work Experience looks good as well. I can't really give you specific programs unless I knew your academic background: quality of undergrad, gpa, concentration, etc. Also, what are your references like and what is your timeline to apply. I ask because if you are reaching for a top school you need to apply soon.
US I would stay away from MIT, still too new and not worth the cost. I would also stay away from anything the the Southeastern US besides Vanderbilt. Boston College could be a very good fit for you, as could Rochester, but I would need to know more about your profile. Purdue, Villanova, and WashU are also good choices, again, depending on academic background.
Elsewhere Obviously Oxbridge, and LSE. Warwick also has a good program as does UCL. I could not recommend you specific programs without knowing your career aspirations first. I would also apply to SDA Boccini (sp?) and IE. Both are better regionally, but place in London as well.
Hope that helps, I know it is a lot, could narrow it down with more personal info.
PM me if you do not wish to post this info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Is 47 quant enough?
[#permalink]
30 Dec 2009, 15:06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|