Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

edit: I should add, though, that because this is a DS question, we can stop long before we reach the answer. _________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Re: OG C DS 131 Is 5^k less than 1000? a. 5^(k+1) >3000 b. [#permalink]
23 Nov 2011, 10:55

Simple Solution: 1) One variable. Inequality. Cannot determine the value of k -> Insufficiant 2) One Vasriable. One euality Equation. I can determine the value of k -> Sufficient

Hence B. I would not calculate anything. Time to solve - < 10 Secs. _________________

Re: OG C DS 131 Is 5^k less than 1000? a. 5^(k+1) >3000 b. [#permalink]
23 Nov 2011, 11:12

1

This post received KUDOS

@iamgame I agree with your theory for statement 2 but I disagree for statement 1

Just because it is inequality and one variable you can't dismiss it. If after simplification you got the statement 1 as 5^k > 1200, it would have been sufficient.

We have to be careful in generalizing that rule. This is especially dangerous for high level inequality problems.

Re: OG C DS 131 Is 5^k less than 1000? a. 5^(k+1) >3000 b. [#permalink]
23 Nov 2011, 13:20

iamgame wrote:

Simple Solution: 1) One variable. Inequality. Cannot determine the value of k -> Insufficiant 2) One Vasriable. One euality Equation. I can determine the value of k -> Sufficient

Hence B. I would not calculate anything. Time to solve - < 10 Secs.

If you're approaching DS questions in that way, you won't get very many of them right, unfortunately. For example, if you saw this question:

Is 5^k < 125?

1) k < 3 2) 5^k = 5*5^(k-1)

then Statement 1 is sufficient, since if k is less than 3, then 5^k is less than 5^3 = 125. Statement 2 gives an equation, but it is not sufficient, since it is always true - it gives you no information at all about the value of k. So in this example, the statement with the inequality *is* sufficient, and the statement with the equation is *not* sufficient. There are countless similar examples that you can find among official questions. _________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Re: OG C DS 131 Is 5^k less than 1000? a. 5^(k+1) >3000 b. [#permalink]
15 Feb 2014, 02:06

Expert's post

seabhi wrote:

Hi, Please add OA. Thanks.

Done.

Is 5^k less than 1,000?

Is 5^k<1,000?

(1) 5^(k+1) > 3,000 --> 5^k>600 --> if k=4 then the answer is YES: since 600<(5^4=625)<1,000 but if k=10, for example, then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) 5^(k-1) = 5^k - 500 --> we can solve for k and get the single numerical value of it, hence this statement is sufficient. Just to illustrate: 5^k-5^{k-1}=500 --> factor out 5^{k-1}: 5^{k-1}(5-1)=500 --> 5^{k-1}=125 --> k-1=3 --> k=4. Sufficient.

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...