Is |a|=b-c ? (1) a+c b (2) a<0 : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 05:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is |a|=b-c ? (1) a+c b (2) a<0

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 336
Schools: St Gallen, Cambridge, HEC Montreal
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Is |a|=b-c ? (1) a+c b (2) a<0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2008, 01:57
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is |a|=b-c ?

(1) a+c≠b

(2) a<0
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2008, 02:13
lumone wrote:
Is |a|=b-c ?

(1) a+c≠b

(2) a<0

I think the ans is A
Statement 1 is sufficient as the condition a+c not equal to b is possible only is a is negative.
Statement is insufficient as it gives no info about b and c
Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 65
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2008, 02:28
lumone wrote:
Is |a|=b-c ?

(1) a+c≠b

(2) a<0

I think its C.

1) a+c≠b but may be -a+c=b so not sufficient

2) a<0 insuffcient

Combine a+c≠b and -a+c≠b sufficient
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 336
Schools: St Gallen, Cambridge, HEC Montreal
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2008, 02:33
I see it this way:

|a|=b-c?
If a> 0, then the question is: a=b-c?
If a<0, then the question is: a=c-b?

(1) a+c≠b
a≠b-c
not sufficient, we need to know whether a>0 to answer that question.

(2)
a>0, but we don't know anything about the relationship between a,b and c

Together, A<0. Therefore the question is: Is a=c-b? And (1) does not tell us that.

My answer is therefore E: Problem the OA is C.

Either I am wrong or the OA is wrong. Would anyone know?
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 287
Schools: INSEAD Class of July '10
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2008, 02:43

Statement (1) is insufficient since it just gives us a value a is not equal to: a≠b-c (but a could be anything else than b-c ! including c-b which could be negative or anything else)

Statement (2) is insufficient since it just gives us the sign of a: a<0 (but a could be any negative number! including -|b-c| and all the other negative numbers)

(1) and (2) are insufficient together too since a could be any negative number different than b-c (if b-c is ever negative, which we don't know and in which case |a|=b-c makes no sense).

But if (1) was a+b≠c, then we would have been able to answer the question (answer would have been (C))
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1569
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2008, 04:06
I will go with E.

Stmt 1: a + c does not equal b. That means, a does not equal b-c.. Insufficient.

Stmt 2: a < 0. Insufficient.

Combining both, a can still not equal b-c. Insufficient.
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2008, 18:22
Oski wrote:

Statement (1) is insufficient since it just gives us a value a is not equal to: a≠b-c (but a could be anything else than b-c ! including c-b which could be negative or anything else)

Statement (2) is insufficient since it just gives us the sign of a: a<0 (but a could be any negative number! including -|b-c| and all the other negative numbers)

(1) and (2) are insufficient together too since a could be any negative number different than b-c (if b-c is ever negative, which we don't know and in which case |a|=b-c makes no sense).

But if (1) was a+b≠c, then we would have been able to answer the question (answer would have been (C))

Hi can you explain how a+b not equal to c is would ans the Q ?
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 287
Schools: INSEAD Class of July '10
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2008, 01:21
saurabhkowley18 wrote:
Hi can you explain how a+b not equal to c is would ans the Q ?

If the question was:
Quote:
Is |a|=b-c ?

(1) a+b≠c

(2) a<0

Then (1) and (2) would be sufficient:

If b<c then |a|=b-c is impossible: we can answer the question i.e. |a|≠b-c

If b$$\ge$$c we want to know if a=b-c OR a=c-b OR a = something else.

(2) tells us a≠b-c (which is >0)

(1) tells us a≠c-b

==> we can conclude a = something else i.e. |a|≠b-c
Re: DS question   [#permalink] 30 Jun 2008, 01:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by