Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

According to GMAT Prep, answer is C. If we consider both the statements, it will end up as 3z<m<4z. How can we confirm that m+z>0 until and unless we know the value of z (+ve or -ve)

According to GMAT Prep, answer is C. If we consider both the statements, it will end up as 3z<m<4z. How can we confirm that m+z>0 until and unless we know the value of z (+ve or -ve)

Pls help me on this one.

If you consider z negative than equation will be -> 3z>m>4z consider z=-1, and assume m= - 3.5, these values doesn't fit the above equation. Hence negative value is not be a right for z amd m in this question. hence, C. _________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you consider z negative than equation will be -> 3z>m>4z consider z=-1, and assume m= - 3.5, these values doesn't fit the above equation. Hence negative value is not be a right for z amd m in this question. hence, C.

Ajay,

Though now that you have old that 3z<m<4z can only imply positive value of z i fully agree and feel i have always known this fact, but otherwise I wouldn't have picked this relation if i saw in question format. thanks so much for this.

however i did solved this question and got the right answer c but through different method(which took me about 1.75mins), can you tell me if my way was right. I solved like this Is m+z > 0? 1) m-3z >0 2) 4z-m >0

as both inequalities have same side, I added both LHS and RHS sides to get z > o

After that I multiplied inequality 1 by 4 to get 4m -12z >0 and inequality 2 by 3 to get 12z -3m..........again I added both t get m > 0.....can you tell me if my multiplying any inequality by a positive number is correct or not ? especially when RHS side contains 0 ?

If you consider z negative than equation will be -> 3z>m>4z consider z=-1, and assume m= - 3.5, these values doesn't fit the above equation. Hence negative value is not be a right for z amd m in this question. hence, C.

Ajay,

Though now that you have old that 3z<m<4z can only imply positive value of z i fully agree and feel i have always known this fact, but otherwise I wouldn't have picked this relation if i saw in question format. thanks so much for this.

however i did solved this question and got the right answer c but through different method(which took me about 1.75mins), can you tell me if my way was right. I solved like this Is m+z > 0? 1) m-3z >0 2) 4z-m >0

as both inequalities have same side, I added both LHS and RHS sides to get z > o

After that I multiplied inequality 1 by 4 to get 4m -12z >0 and inequality 2 by 3 to get 12z -3m..........again I added both t get m > 0.....can you tell me if my multiplying any inequality by a positive number is correct or not ? especially when RHS side contains 0 ?

@Aj85 - your method is also right but as you said, it takes time. while solving any inequality i always prefer to put relevant numerical values and check. In this question its very easy to figure out that when z is negative the equation is -> 3z>m>4z and when z is positive than equation is -> 3z<m<4z. Put z=-1, and m= - 3.5 and z=1, and m= 3.5 respectively.

Hope it helps. _________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

A few weeks ago, the following tweet popped up in my timeline. thanks @Uber_Mumbai for showing me what #daylightrobbery means!I know I have a choice not to use it...

“This elective will be most relevant to learn innovative methodologies in digital marketing in a place which is the origin for major marketing companies.” This was the crux...