Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Re: DS - inequality problem [#permalink]
14 Jul 2010, 07:12
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
zest4mba wrote:
Can someone explain how to solve this quickly
Is p a negative number?
(1) p3(1 – p2) < 0
(2) p2 – 1 < 0
Is \(p<0\)?
(1) \(p^3(1-p^2)<0\), or which is the same \(p(1-p^2)<0\) --> \(p<p^3\) --> either \(p\) is more than 1, \(p>1\) OR \(p\) is negative fraction \(-1<p<0\).
So we have two ranges for \(p\): \(p>1\) or \(-1<p<0\). Not sufficient.
(2) \(p^2-1<0\) --> \(-1<p<1\). Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) is the range \(-1<p<0\), so the answer to the question "is \(p<0\)" is YES. Sufficient.
Re: DS - inequality problem [#permalink]
14 Jul 2010, 07:28
The fastest way to solve this problem is to plot a graph. I would love to help but I lack right now the resources to post a picture. I believe that Bunuel will soon show up and help us.
I will try to explain anyway:
(1) Consider three parallel number lines (p) , one for \(p^3\), one for \(1-p^2\) and a third one to represent the product of the these two functions. The "+" and "-" represents the sign (Y) of the functions.
A: \(p^3\):-------(-1)---0+++(+1)++++ B: \(1-p^2\):----(-1)+++0+++(+1)----- A*B:++++++++(-1)---0+++(+1)----- --> So p can be either positive or negative = Insuff.
(2) \(p^2 - 1\) ++++(-1)---(0)---(+1)++++++ Same as in (1), p can be either positive or negative = Insuff.
(1) and (2) together shows a clear intersection when p < 0, so Suff.
Re: DS - inequality problem [#permalink]
14 Jul 2010, 11:23
Expert's post
FedX wrote:
shouldn't the question be
is p negative??
in the above solution we considered "p" in the range -1<p<0
Question: is \(p\) negative? Is \(p<0\)?
When we considered statements together we've got that \(-1<p<0\): every \(p\) from this range is negative (every \(p\) from this range is \(<0\)). Hence taken together statements are sufficient.
Re: DS - inequality problem [#permalink]
14 Jul 2010, 12:08
Bunuel wrote:
FedX wrote:
shouldn't the question be
is p negative??
in the above solution we considered "p" in the range -1<p<0
Question: is \(p\) negative? Is \(p<0\)?
When we considered statements together we've got that \(-1<p<0\): every \(p\) from this range is negative (every \(p\) from this range is \(<0\)). Hence taken together statements are sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear.
This is fine..but the original poster has put it as "Is p a negative number"? Do they both mean the same??
Re: DS - inequality problem [#permalink]
14 Jul 2010, 12:20
Expert's post
FedX wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
FedX wrote:
shouldn't the question be
is p negative??
in the above solution we considered "p" in the range -1<p<0
Question: is \(p\) negative? Is \(p<0\)?
When we considered statements together we've got that \(-1<p<0\): every \(p\) from this range is negative (every \(p\) from this range is \(<0\)). Hence taken together statements are sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear.
This is fine..but the original poster has put it as "Is p a negative number"? Do they both mean the same??
The questions "is \(p\) negative" and "is \(p\) a negative number" are the same. Maybe you confused "number" with "integer"? _________________
Re: Is p a negative number? [#permalink]
20 Sep 2014, 02:25
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
Re: Is p a negative number? [#permalink]
22 Sep 2014, 09:02
zest4mba wrote:
Is p a negative number?
(1) p^3(1 – p^2) < 0 (2) p^2 – 1 < 0
1) the inequality holds true for +ve numbers as well as -1<p<0 so insufficient.
2) the inequality holds true for 0<p<1 & -1<p<0 or -1<p<1 so insufficient.
(1)+(2) (2) says p^2 - 1 < 0 or (1-p^2) > 0 plugging that in 1, we get p^3(positive quantity) < 0 or p^3 < 0 which means p < 0 hence sufficient. _________________
Illegitimi non carborundum.
gmatclubot
Re: Is p a negative number?
[#permalink]
22 Sep 2014, 09:02
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Perhaps known best for its men’s basketball team – winners of five national championships, including last year’s – Duke University is also home to an elite full-time MBA...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...