Is p+q >r+s 1.p>r+s 2.q>r+s : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 09:45

# STARTING SOON:

Open Admission Chat with MBA Experts of Personal MBA Coach - Join Chat Room to Participate.

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is p+q >r+s 1.p>r+s 2.q>r+s

Author Message
Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 598
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Is p+q >r+s 1.p>r+s 2.q>r+s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2004, 13:01
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is p+q >r+s
1.p>r+s
2.q>r+s
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Location: Utrecht
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2004, 13:13
I think the answer is C.

st.1
p > r+s
r+s = 2 than p > 2, but we still donÂ´t know the value of q.

st.2
q > r+s
r+s = 2 than q > 2, but we still donÂ´t know the value of p.

Both statements together prove that p and q are more than r+s.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Regards,

Alex
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2004, 15:17
saurya_s wrote:
Is p+q >r+s
1.p>r+s
2.q>r+s

Got C
either one or 2 is not sufficient if we plu in -ve nums for pqrs
Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 42
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2004, 15:06

first and second statements insufficient.

Togther
let r+s = -10
p = -6
q = -6

p+q not greater than r+s gives a No answer, but we can easily pick numbers to get an Yes answer.

So, E.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 347
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2004, 18:00
What a beauty scoobee. Yes E IT SHUD BE.
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Location: Utrecht
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2004, 04:13
Very nice indeed Scooby.

Regards,

Alex
Director
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 610
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2004, 06:21
(1)+(2) => p+q > 2(r+s)
question is "is 2(r+s) > r+s ?"
Yes if r+s >0
No if <0
16 Sep 2004, 06:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by