Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 10:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Is round 1 that much better than round 2?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 8

Is round 1 that much better than round 2? [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2009, 10:07
Hey Paul/Linda, I was hoping to get your honest assessment of my situation...

Essentially, to be brutally honest with myself, I have grossly underestimated the time and prep required to score 700+ on the gmat. I was halfassedly studying for the last month and a half and have done some practice tests and I am nowhere near where I need to be in terms of timing and accuracy. If I clamped down and studied hard over the next month, I am still not comfortable that I would be a lock for 700+. I think what I need is a prep course, however all the live courses I have come across are 2 month courses (8 classes, a day a week). This would make it virtually impossible to get my application in for first round given the timing of the courses.

The question boils down to this:

a) Do I absolutely need 700+ to crack the top 5 schools?
b) Am I better off applying in the second round with a higher gmat (700+) or should I take my chances, potentially get below 700, and apply in the first round (where I assume there's less competition)?

An interesting note from the HBS admissions' director blog (HBS website):

"What is the difference between applying in round one and round two?"

Not much. We'll make roughly the same number of admissions offers in each round. While we have a smaller number of applications in round one, I will generalize and say that they historically tend to be a very organized and eager group who want to know where they stand as soon as possible.

Thanks for your thoughts.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 1675
Location: San Diego, California
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

Re: Is round 1 that much better than round 2? [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2009, 09:17
Blayze,

A 700 score is not absolutely essential for all applicants to top 5 schools, underrepresented minorities being a case in point. But for most applicants, yes, you need to clear at a minimum the 700 (or 80th percentile in both Q and V) threshold. Most schools say the same thing as HBS regarding the difference between first and second rounds, and I don't doubt them. The benefit of applying first round over second is that in the first you don't have to worry about whether someone with a "profile" similar to yours has already been accepted--if you're from a typical applicant pool you can be better assured that you will be one of the dozens of qualified applicants from that pool that the school accepts.

But definitely take the time to get the best GMAT score possible.

_________________

Paul Bodine /
Author, Great Applications for Business School and Perfect Phrases for Business School Acceptance

Follow Paul Bodine on Twitter

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Yeah well whatever.
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 347
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE: Analyst (Insurance)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 17

Re: Is round 1 that much better than round 2? [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2010, 11:26
Hi PBodine,

It's interesting that I'm now talking to you through two mediums (facebook & gmatclub). I only know who you are because of your gmatclub name and the book you wrote that I purchased. I've never heard anyone give a number for the question that I'm about to ask. What is your educated guess for what that general floor of GMAT scores is for URM's? I'm in a similar situation as the original poster but I'm also an AA male. So I’m particularly interested in the point you raised above. After months of self study and several practice tests I took the real thing and got a 660, which isn’t bad but I want to do better so that I not only am in the running for where I want to go but also receive as much non-loan financial aid as possible. I start a prep class with mgmat tomorrow and my goal is to move 50 points.

Wish me luck.

Bruce (yeah I used my real name)
_________________

He that is in me > he that is in the world. - source 1 John 4:4

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Round 1 vs Round 2 krishna3891 2 26 Jul 2010, 13:42
Round 1 vs Round 2 krishna3891 3 26 Jul 2010, 13:37
Round 1 vs Round 2 sdrandom1 3 12 Aug 2009, 17:22
Is round 1 that much better than round 2? Blayze 2 12 Jul 2009, 10:05
Round 1 vs. Round 2 mediamindy 3 20 Aug 2007, 05:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is round 1 that much better than round 2?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.