Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 01:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Is rst = 1 ?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 2

Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2010, 11:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

68% (01:45) correct 32% (00:38) wrong based on 316 sessions
Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Bunuel on 07 Dec 2012, 08:01, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 456
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 46

Re: GMAT Paper test - Test Code 14 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2010, 11:56
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient

Reason:
(plugging in method)

Statement 1: Say r = 1/3 and s = 3

satisfies statement 1 i.e. rs = 1 but cant comment about value of rst as t is still unknown.

Statement 2: Say t = 1/3 and s = 3

satisfies statement 1 i.e. st = 1 but cant comment about value of rst as t is still unknown.

Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Re: GMAT Paper test - Test Code 14 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2010, 12:21
piyatiwari wrote:
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient


Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.


But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 456
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 46

Re: GMAT Paper test - Test Code 14 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2010, 12:51
loki wrote:
piyatiwari wrote:
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient


Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.


But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'



Oh yes. My usual mistake :). Thanks so much Loki. This goes directly to my error log.

So the answer is "C"
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 23393
Followers: 3607

Kudos [?]: 28813 [1] , given: 2849

Re: GMAT Paper test - Test Code 14 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2010, 12:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
loki wrote:
piyatiwari wrote:
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient


Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.


But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'


Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1

Try r=s=t=1, both statements hold true and rst=1.
Try r=s=t=-1, both statements hold true and rst=-1.

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
_________________

NEW TO MATH FORUM? PLEASE READ THIS: ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT!!!

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory; 7. Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets; 9. PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders; 11. GMAT Prep Software Analysis NEW!!!; 12. SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) NEW!!!; 12. Tricky questions from previous years. NEW!!!;

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Re: GMAT Paper test - Test Code 14 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2010, 13:04
Bunuel wrote:
loki wrote:
piyatiwari wrote:
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient


Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.

hence both the statements are not sufficient.


But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'


Try r=s=t=1, both statement hold true and rst=1.
Try r=s=t=-1, both statement hold true and rst=-1.

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.


OA is E. I get it now! Thank you!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 19

OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2010, 10:19
Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant.

I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong.

95. Is rst=1

(1) rs=1
(2) st=1

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.

so, rs=1/t
then sub in rs=1
so, 1=1/t
then cross multiply t=1
Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1
Therefore, sufficient.

Same logic can be applied to statment 2.
Therefore my answer was D.

OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great.

Thanks
_________________

G.T.L. - GMAT, Tanning, Laundry

Round 1: 05/12/10 handling-a-grenade-thesituation-s-official-debrief-94181.html

Round 2: 07/10/10 - This time it's personal.

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 364
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 217 [2] , given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2010, 10:34
2
This post received
KUDOS
Currency wrote:
Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant.

I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong.

95. Is rst=1

(1) rs=1
(2) st=1

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.

so, rs=1/t
then sub in rs=1
so, 1=1/t
then cross multiply t=1
Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1
Therefore, sufficient.

Same logic can be applied to statment 2.
Therefore my answer was D.

OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great.

Thanks


The highlighted part is the mistake.

The question is asking u to prove that... and you are considering the same as True. This isnt the correct approach.

The Answer E is correct...

Is rst = 1?
S1: rs = 1,
t can be 2 ... then rst is not equal to 1...
t can be 1... then rst is equal to 1...
Hence IN SUFF

S2: st =1 ,
r can be 2 ... then rst is not equal to 1..
r can be 1 .. then rst is equal to 1...
Hence IN SUFF...

combining I and 2...
we can have .. r = 2, s = 1/2, t = 2
Then rst = 2
but we can also have r = 1, s = 1, t =1
Then rst = 1..

Hence E...

Hope this helps!
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 549
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 92

Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2010, 10:36
Currency wrote:
Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant.

I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong.

95. Is rst=1

(1) rs=1
(2) st=1

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.

so, rs=1/t
then sub in rs=1
so, 1=1/t
then cross multiply t=1
Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1
Therefore, sufficient.

Same logic can be applied to statment 2.
Therefore my answer was D.

OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great.

Thanks

Okay, you can really deal with this much simpler. But, let's review what you've done.

I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t.
so, rs=1/t


your question then changes to -- Is rs=1/t?
1. Does this give the vale of t? No. Even if you use (1), you get -- 1=1/t -> t=1. Does this answer your question. No. A/D out
2. Similarly, does the value of st=1, help us in answering the question? No. B out

Hope this helps.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 19

Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2010, 10:41
Quote:
"The question is asking u to prove that... and you are considering the same as True. This isnt the correct approach."


This is what I was missing. Normally I'd instinctively follow that, but I think cause it was in my error log I over-thought it and got fancy - effectively confusing myself. Ha!

Thanks for the quick repsonses guys, much appreciated!
_________________

G.T.L. - GMAT, Tanning, Laundry

Round 1: 05/12/10 handling-a-grenade-thesituation-s-official-debrief-94181.html

Round 2: 07/10/10 - This time it's personal.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 178
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink] New post 15 Feb 2010, 05:32
i) rs=1
r=1/3 s=3 and t=7 so ans is no
r=1/3 s=3 and t=1 so ans is yes
not suff.

ii) st=1
s=1/3 and t=3 and r=7 so ans is no
r=1/3 s=3 and t=1 so ans is yes

not sufficient

combining both 1 and 2

s=1/3 r=3 and t=3 still it satisfies both eq but rst is not 1

if s=1 r=1 and t=1 it satisifies both eq. and rst is 1

so ans is E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Posts: 169
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 60

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Is rst=1? Statement 1: rs=1 Statement 2: st=1 [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2011, 11:31
i) rs=1
As we don't know anything about value of t so we cant answer if rst = 1. Insufficient.

ii) st=1
As we don't know anything about value of r so we cant answer if rst = 1. Insufficient.

Combining both 1 and 2

(rs)(st) = 1
(rst)s = 1
rst = 1/s

As we don't know the value of s. rst can be anything (1 or something else). we cannot answer "Is rst = 1?"

Insufficient
Ans: E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2012, 11:27
Its clear that 1 and 2 do not lead to a solution. then, Cant this be solved by observing that we have 2 equations and 3 unknown variables. hence not sufficient and hence E?
Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 23393
Followers: 3607

Kudos [?]: 28813 [0], given: 2849

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2012, 06:34
Expert's post
4sguy wrote:
Its clear that 1 and 2 do not lead to a solution. then, Cant this be solved by observing that we have 2 equations and 3 unknown variables. hence not sufficient and hence E?


That's not entirely correct. Notice that we are asked to find whether rst = 1, not the values of the unknowns.

For example if the question were:

Is rst = 1 ?

(1) rs = 0
(2) st = 1

The answer would be A not E.
_________________

NEW TO MATH FORUM? PLEASE READ THIS: ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT!!!

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory; 7. Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets; 9. PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders; 11. GMAT Prep Software Analysis NEW!!!; 12. SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) NEW!!!; 12. Tricky questions from previous years. NEW!!!;

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2011
Posts: 92
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT Date: 01-30-2013
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2013, 14:21
statement 1: don't know anything about t. not sufficient
statement 2: don't know anything about r. not sufficient

put them together: rst could equal (1)(1)(1) in which case would be 1. or rst could equal (1/2)(2)(1/2) in which case rst = 1/2. Not sufficient

Answer: E
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 2831
Followers: 206

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink] New post 22 Apr 2014, 07:43
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

GMAT Books | GMAT Club Tests | Best Prices on GMAT Courses | GMAT Mobile App | Math Resources | Verbal Resources

Re: Is rst = 1 ?   [#permalink] 22 Apr 2014, 07:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Is rst <= 1? gmatpapa 6 30 Dec 2010, 05:23
In isosceles RST what is the measure of R (1) The measure of lexis 3 05 Jul 2008, 02:21
Experts publish their posts in the topic Is rst = 1? 1. rs = 1 2. st = 1 michaelny2001 5 18 Dec 2007, 11:54
Is rst=1? 1) rs=1 2) st=1 faifai0714 2 01 Mar 2007, 01:29
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Is rst = 1? sudhagar 6 07 Nov 2005, 21:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is rst = 1 ?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.