Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

1 is insufficient because it only gives us info on two angles.

2 is insufficient because it only gives us info on two angles.

Combine and sufficient.

The two 90 degree angles have to cannot be part of statement two together but one of the 90 degree angles can be. If ABC = 90 than BCD = 45 and CDA = 145.

But if no 90 degree angle is included in statment two than one angle equals 120 and the other 60.

I assumed that the two 90-degree angles had to be opposites, because if they were adjacent I falsely assumed the quadrilateral would have to be a rectangle, because it would form two parallel lines. Of course, I realize now that these two parallel lines could be of different lengths, so the pair of angles where one is double the other could not involve a 90 degree angle at all.

Anyway, I see now that it's E. Thanks for clearing it up.

Hallo everybody, i think that both together are sufficient to answer the question if one of the interior angles is equal to 60 degrees.
From A) we know that 2 of the angles are right. We can select these in 6 ways
From B) we know that two adjacent angles ABC and BCD are in ratio- ABC/BCD= 2/1
Now by A) and B) by any comb of 2 angles that are right we can find info about the other angles and establish if there is an angle that is 60 degrees

S1: Sum of remaining two angles = 180 so those may be 110,70 or anything else. INSUFF.

S2: INSUFF just by common sense

Combined:

Sum of ABC and BCD = 360-180 (Two right angles from S1) = 180. Say BCD = x then ABC = 2x

S0 3x = 180 and x = 60. SUFF

I think your assumption is wrong. As pointed above the angles can be 90,90,45,135 also. Both conditions are met. Both conditions are not sufficient to conclusively answer. IMO answer is E.

S1: Sum of remaining two angles = 180 so those may be 110,70 or anything else. INSUFF.

S2: INSUFF just by common sense

Combined:

Sum of ABC and BCD = 360-180 (Two right angles from S1) = 180. Say BCD = x then ABC = 2x

S0 3x = 180 and x = 60. SUFF

I think your assumption is wrong. As pointed above the angles can be 90,90,45,135 also. Both conditions are met. Both conditions are not sufficient to conclusively answer. IMO answer is E.

You are absolutely right. I thought on the wrong lines. It should be E.
_________________

C is the correct answer because the second statements states that a certain angle (say A) is twice the other angle (say B).

So angle 45 and 145 are impossible.

Quadrilateral internal angle sum=360deg

1) Statement : two angle are 90deg Conclusion: Sum of other two angles 180deg

2) Angle A twice Angle B Therefore A+B=180 or B+2B=180 --> B=60

Angle A twice Angle B
If ABC=90, BCD=ABC/2=45, CDA=135, DAC=90.

So 45 and 135 is not impossible.
In your assumption in 2), you consider only one possibility, that one right angle cannot be considered as the double of the other.

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...