|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 24
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[1] , given: 37
|
Is the positive integer p the sum of the positive prime [#permalink]
 21 Aug 2010, 04:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
Question Stats:
64% (02:33) correct
35% (01:39) wrong based on 0 sessions
this is a question from Jeff Sackmann's MATH Set Is the positive integer p the sum of the positive prime numbers m and n? (1) m - n = 8 (2) p = 50 I don't quite get how to solve the Q, inspite of the Explanation below. Pls help OA: C
Explanation: To answer this question, you at the very least need the value of p; it would help to know something about m and n as well. Statement (1) is insuff; there are many possible prime number pairs that are 8 apart, and without knowing the value of p, we have no idea whether their sum is equal to p.
Statement (2) is insuff: it's helpful to know that p = 50, but m and n could be 3 and 47, or they could be 3 and 5. In one case, the sum is equal to p; in the other, it isn't.
Taken together, the statements are su¢ cient. The only pair of numbers that are 8 apart and sum to 50 are 21 and 29. 21 isn't a prime number, so whatever the values of m and n, they aren't 21 and 29. Thus, so long as m and n are 8 apart, they don't sum to 50, so their sum is not equal to p. (C) is the correct choice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11516
Followers: 1792
Kudos [?]:
9537
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Sum of Positive Primes [#permalink]
21 Aug 2010, 04:48
wininblue wrote: this is a question from Jeff Sackmann's MATH Set Is the positive integer p the sum of the positive prime numbers m and n? (1) m - n = 8 (2) p = 50 I don't quite get how to solve the Q, inspite of the Explanation below. Pls help OA: C
Explanation: To answer this question, you at the very least need the value of p; it would help to know something about m and n as well. Statement (1) is insuff; there are many possible prime number pairs that are 8 apart, and without knowing the value of p, we have no idea whether their sum is equal to p.
Statement (2) is insuff: it's helpful to know that p = 50, but m and n could be 3 and 47, or they could be 3 and 5. In one case, the sum is equal to p; in the other, it isn't.
Taken together, the statements are su¢ cient. The only pair of numbers that are 8 apart and sum to 50 are 21 and 29. 21 isn't a prime number, so whatever the values of m and n, they aren't 21 and 29. Thus, so long as m and n are 8 apart, they don't sum to 50, so their sum is not equal to p. (C) is the correct choice Given: p=integer>0, m and n are prime numbers. Question: is m+n=50(1) m - n = 8, clearly insufficient, as no info about p. (2) p = 50 --> could 50 be the sum of 2 primes? Yes, 47+3=50. But m and n could be some other primes as well, which don't add up to 50, hence this statement is also not sufficient. (1)+(2) m-n=8 and p=50. Let's assume that m+n=p=50 is true. Then solving for m and n (2 equations m-n=8 and m+n=50) we get that m=29 and n=21, but 21 is not prime number and we are given that n=prime hence our assumption that m+n={p} is false. So m+n\neq{p}. Sufficient. Answer: C.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 24
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 37
|
Re: Sum of Positive Primes [#permalink]
21 Aug 2010, 05:23
Thanks Bunuel for your quick response.
So here, since P cannot be expressed as a sum of primes which differ by 8 - the ans is C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2010
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 7
|
Re: Sum of Positive Primes [#permalink]
21 Aug 2010, 07:54
I agree. The answer is C. Similar explanation Abhishek wininblue wrote: this is a question from Jeff Sackmann's MATH Set Is the positive integer p the sum of the positive prime numbers m and n? (1) m - n = 8 (2) p = 50 I don't quite get how to solve the Q, inspite of the Explanation below. Pls help OA: C
Explanation: To answer this question, you at the very least need the value of p; it would help to know something about m and n as well. Statement (1) is insuff; there are many possible prime number pairs that are 8 apart, and without knowing the value of p, we have no idea whether their sum is equal to p.
Statement (2) is insuff: it's helpful to know that p = 50, but m and n could be 3 and 47, or they could be 3 and 5. In one case, the sum is equal to p; in the other, it isn't.
Taken together, the statements are su¢ cient. The only pair of numbers that are 8 apart and sum to 50 are 21 and 29. 21 isn't a prime number, so whatever the values of m and n, they aren't 21 and 29. Thus, so long as m and n are 8 apart, they don't sum to 50, so their sum is not equal to p. (C) is the correct choice |
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 694
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
50
[0], given: 15
|
Re: Sum of Positive Primes [#permalink]
23 Aug 2010, 22:11
Bunuel wrote: wininblue wrote: this is a question from Jeff Sackmann's MATH Set Is the positive integer p the sum of the positive prime numbers m and n? (1) m - n = 8 (2) p = 50 I don't quite get how to solve the Q, inspite of the Explanation below. Pls help OA: C
Explanation: To answer this question, you at the very least need the value of p; it would help to know something about m and n as well. Statement (1) is insuff; there are many possible prime number pairs that are 8 apart, and without knowing the value of p, we have no idea whether their sum is equal to p.
Statement (2) is insuff: it's helpful to know that p = 50, but m and n could be 3 and 47, or they could be 3 and 5. In one case, the sum is equal to p; in the other, it isn't.
Taken together, the statements are su¢ cient. The only pair of numbers that are 8 apart and sum to 50 are 21 and 29. 21 isn't a prime number, so whatever the values of m and n, they aren't 21 and 29. Thus, so long as m and n are 8 apart, they don't sum to 50, so their sum is not equal to p. (C) is the correct choice Given: p=integer>0, m and n are prime numbers. Question: is m+n=50(1) m - n = 8, clearly insufficient, as no info about p. (2) p = 50 --> could 50 be the sum of 2 primes? Yes, 47+3=50. But m and n could be some other primes as well, which don't add up to 50, hence this statement is also not sufficient. (1)+(2) m-n=8 and p=50. Let's assume that m+n=p=50 is true. Then solving for m and n (2 equations m-n=8 and m+n=50) we get that m=29 and n=21, but 21 is not prime number and we are given that n=prime hence our assumption that m+n={p} is false. So m+n\neq{p}. Sufficient. Answer: C. Bunuel Should not the question be is p=m+n? Why is the question is m+n=50? "But m and n could be some other primes as well, which don't add up to 50, hence this statement is also not sufficient." I am confused. By 2, we have p=50. If 47+3 is the ONLY combination of positive primes that gives us 50, then isn't 2 sufficient? You mention that there could be other primes that don't add up to 50 here, but then it is given that p=50. What am I missing?
_________________
Consider kudos, they are good for health
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 148
Location: Toronto
Followers: 31
Kudos [?]:
89
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Sum of Positive Primes [#permalink]
24 Aug 2010, 02:02
mainhoon wrote: Bunuel
Should not the question be is p=m+n? Why is the question is m+n=50?
"But m and n could be some other primes as well, which don't add up to 50, hence this statement is also not sufficient."
I am confused. By 2, we have p=50. If 47+3 is the ONLY combination of positive primes that gives us 50, then isn't 2 sufficient? You mention that there could be other primes that don't add up to 50 here, but then it is given that p=50. What am I missing? Hi, you're correct, the question is "does p = m + n?" Since (2) tells us that p=50, we can now substitute that value into the question to get a new question: "does 50 = m + n?" However, since we have no idea what the actual values of m and n are, we're allowed to pick any primes. So, if m=3 and n=47, then we ask "does 50 = 3 + 47?" and get the answer YES. However, if m=5 and n=7, we ask "does 50 = 5 + 7?" and get the answer NO. Since statement (2) can generate both a YES and a NO answer, it's insufficient. Here's your error (a very common one in data sufficiency): you turned the question into a statement; in other words, to answer the question "is p = m + n?", you assumed that "p = m + n".
_________________
Stuart Kovinsky
stuart.kovinsky@kaplan.com
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT
Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course!
Kaplan Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Sum of Positive Primes
[#permalink]
24 Aug 2010, 02:02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
