Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given a=b, but we do not know anything about c. If c=a, then it is equilateral. B alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given c≠b, we know nothing about 'a' here.

Is the triangle with three sides a,b,c, isosceles? (1) a = b (2) c ≠ b

OA will be posted later

sjayasa wrote:

IMO C

A alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given a=b, but we do not know anything about c. If c=a, then it is equilateral. B alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given c≠b, we know nothing about 'a' here.

A and B together - SUFFICIENT.

This cannot be the real GMAT question as it test technicality of defining isosceles triangle: If we say that an isosceles triangle is a triangle with exactly two equal sides then the answer is C. If we say that an isosceles triangle is a triangle with at least two equal sides then answer is A. So if we take this definition (which is more precise and more common) then we'll have that equilateral triangle is just a special case of isosceles triangle.

If I had to pick I'd pick A for this question.
_________________

i found this question in one of the good sources of questions in GMAT found on other website Though the question is with diagram of a triangle with three sides given as a,b,c

stmt 1. Explanation there says that because a=b hence it is an isosceles triangle (what about c , we dont know if c is equal to a or b, or not)

It says stmt 2 is insufficient because c is not equal to b (if in statement1 we didnt consider c then why to consider a in statment 2)

Answer itself contradicts each other. Thats why i posted it here to get to know if i am missing something
_________________

Is the triangle with three sides a,b,c, isosceles? (1) a = b (2) c ≠ b

OA will be posted later

sjayasa wrote:

IMO C

A alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given a=b, but we do not know anything about c. If c=a, then it is equilateral. B alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given c≠b, we know nothing about 'a' here.

A and B together - SUFFICIENT.

This cannot be the real GMAT question as it test technicality of defining isosceles triangle: If we say that an isosceles triangle is a triangle with exactly two equal sides then the answer is C. If we say that an isosceles triangle is a triangle with at least two equal sides then answer is A. So if we take this definition (which is more precise and more common) then we'll have that equilateral triangle is just a special case of isosceles triangle.

If I had to pick I'd pick A for this question.

Hi Bunuel, thanks for pointing it out. What does GMAT say about isosceles/equilateral definition? Is there a common agreement?

Is the triangle with three sides a,b,c, isosceles? (1) a = b (2) c ≠ b

OA will be posted later

sjayasa wrote:

IMO C

A alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given a=b, but we do not know anything about c. If c=a, then it is equilateral. B alone is INSUFFICIENT. Given c≠b, we know nothing about 'a' here.

A and B together - SUFFICIENT.

This cannot be the real GMAT question as it test technicality of defining isosceles triangle: If we say that an isosceles triangle is a triangle with exactly two equal sides then the answer is C. If we say that an isosceles triangle is a triangle with at least two equal sides then answer is A. So if we take this definition (which is more precise and more common) then we'll have that equilateral triangle is just a special case of isosceles triangle.

If I had to pick I'd pick A for this question.

Hi Bunuel, thanks for pointing it out. What does GMAT say about isosceles/equilateral definition? Is there a common agreement?

According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length.

As for equilateral triangle: equilateral triangle is a triangle which has all sides of the same length.
_________________

Re: Is the triangle with three sides a, b, c, isosceles? [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2016, 11:16

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...