Is the two-digit integer, with digits R and M (in that : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 04:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is the two-digit integer, with digits R and M (in that

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Is the two-digit integer, with digits R and M (in that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2005, 15:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is the two-digit integer, with digits R and M (in that order), a multiple of 7?
(1) R + M = 13
(2) R is divisible by 3
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 246
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2005, 15:34
the number is RM

(1) R+M
with R=4 and M=9
4+9=13
49 is divisible by 7
with R=8 and M=5
8+5=13
85 is not divisible by 7
==>INSUFF

(2)
R divisible by 3, so R can only be 3, 6, or 9
digits divisible by 7 in the 30s 60s and 90s are
35 or 63.... but M could also be 1 then 31 is not divisible by 7
==>INSUFF

(1)&(2)
numbers in the 30s, 60s, and 90s, divisible by 7 are: 35, 63, and 91
Sum of these digits never equal 13. The answer is NO

==> SUFF
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2005, 16:57
C.

the only number for which both statements together is:
94

this is not divisible by 7
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2005, 17:27
duttsit wrote:
C. the only number for which both statements together is: 94. this is not divisible by 7

how about 67? it is also not divisible by 7.
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2005, 18:20
HIMALAYA wrote:
duttsit wrote:
C. the only number for which both statements together is: 94. this is not divisible by 7

how about 67? it is also not divisible by 7.

thats true. incidently this one too is nto divisible by 7 so answer C remains valid. Good point.
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 17:16
correct. The OA is C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 21:08
(1) Insufficient.

If R+M = 13, then we can have many combintions of R and M which may or may not be divisible by 7

(2) Insufficient

R divisible by 3 imples R = 3, 6 and 7. However, nothing is said about M

(1/2)

If R = 3, 6 and 7 implies M = 10, 7 and 6 respectively.

However the only vaild options for RM is 67 or 76 neither which are divisible by 7

The answer to this question is NO.

I pick C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 21:10
Opps typo in my last statement.

(1/2)
R = 3, 6, 9 implies M = 10, 7, 4 therefore RM = 67 and 94. Neither is divisible by 7.

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 417
Location: India, Chennai
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: DS multiple of 7 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 22:05
marth750 wrote:
Is the two-digit integer, with digits R and M (in that order), a multiple of 7?
(1) R + M = 13
(2) R is divisible by 3

Let RM = 94 then RM is not multiple of 7. LET RM = 49 them RM is multiple of 7. So stmt 1 is not suff.

Let RM = 94 not multiple of 7. Let RM = 63 multiple of 7. So insufficient. (Infact sice R is divisible by 3, the tens digit can only be 3,6 or 9)

Combining both: RM can be 67 or 94. Both are not divisible by 7. Hence C.
Re: DS multiple of 7   [#permalink] 09 Nov 2005, 22:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by