Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I thought it was C, because the only way for the triangle to be isosceles given both conditions is for BC = AC , and that's not possible because side AC + BC (assuming they are the same length) would equal AB. And the third side of the triangle must be greater than the sum of the other two sides or less than the difference of the other two sides. So given both conditions, should we be able to say for sure that the triangle is not isosceles?

I thought it was C, because the only way for the triangle to be isosceles given both conditions is for BC = AC , and that's not possible because side AC + BC (assuming they are the same length) would equal AB. And the third side of the triangle must be greater than the sum of the other two sides or less than the difference of the other two sides. So given both conditions, should we be able to say for sure that the triangle is not isosceles?

The OG says it's E though. Please help.

Your reasoning is correct answer should be C, not E.

Is triangle ABC an isosceles?

Attachment:

Screen Shot 2012-05-08 at 1.05.37 PM.png [ 7.39 KiB | Viewed 5806 times ]

(1) AB/BC = 2 --> \(AB\neq{BC}\). Not sufficient on its own. (2) x≠y --> \(AB\neq{AC}\). Not sufficient on its own.

(1)+(2) Since \(AB\neq{BC}\) and \(AB\neq{AC}\), then the only way ABC to be isosceles is when \(AC=BC\). But in this case as given that AB=2BC then AB=BC+BC=BC+AC which is not possible because the length of any side of a triangle must be smaller than the sum of the other two sides. So, \(AC\neq{BC}\), which means that ABC is not isosceles. Sufficient.

I thought it was C, because the only way for the triangle to be isosceles given both conditions is for BC = AC , and that's not possible because side AC + BC (assuming they are the same length) would equal AB. And the third side of the triangle must be greater than the sum of the other two sides or less than the difference of the other two sides. So given both conditions, should we be able to say for sure that the triangle is not isosceles?

The OG says it's E though. Please help.

Answer should be E even if we cosider both 1) & 2) consider the below examples:

Case 1--> x= 30, y=100 & third angle= 50 Case 2--> x=45, y=90 & third angle =45

here both 1) & 2) are satisfied but there is contradiction in result, i.e. in one case traingle is issoceles, in other it is not, for the same conditions. Hence E _________________

Best Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

I thought it was C, because the only way for the triangle to be isosceles given both conditions is for BC = AC , and that's not possible because side AC + BC (assuming they are the same length) would equal AB. And the third side of the triangle must be greater than the sum of the other two sides or less than the difference of the other two sides. So given both conditions, should we be able to say for sure that the triangle is not isosceles?

The OG says it's E though. Please help.

Answer should be E even if we cosider both 1) & 2) consider the below examples:

Case 1--> x= 30, y=100 & third angle= 50 Case 2--> x=45, y=90 & third angle =45

here both 1) & 2) are satisfied but there is contradiction in result, i.e. in one case traingle is issoceles, in other it is not, for the same conditions. Hence E

When considering the statements together the red scenario is not possible. If x=z then it would mean that AC=BC. But in this case as given that AB=2BC then AB=BC+BC=BC+AC which is not possible because the length of any side of a triangle must be smaller than the sum of the other two sides. _________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

This is the kickoff for my 2016-2017 application season. After a summer of introspect and debate I have decided to relaunch my b-school application journey. Why would anyone want...

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

Time is a weird concept. It can stretch for seemingly forever (like when you are watching the “Time to destination” clock mid-flight) and it can compress and...