|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 136
Location: India
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
87
[7] , given: 33
|
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
22 Feb 2012, 19:59
7
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
40% (02:48) correct
59% (01:07) wrong based on 39 sessions
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| Liked the question? encourage by giving kudos
_________________
Encourage me by pressing the KUDOS if you find my post to be helpful. Help me win "The One Thing You Wish You Knew - GMAT Club Contest"the-one-thing-you-wish-you-knew-gmat-club-contest-140358.html#p1130989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11522
Followers: 1795
Kudos [?]:
9551
[10] , given: 826
|
Re: [tricky one] Is x > 0? [#permalink]
22 Feb 2012, 22:02
10
This post received KUDOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2011
Posts: 24
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
25 Feb 2012, 10:45
Bunnel, For statement one, I understand that you have not solved for x in your solution. I am still learning the abs value and in equalities. Can you share your thoughts on the following solution (solving for x in both statements)
a. |x+3| = 4x -3 |x+3| = x + 3 for x + 3 >= 0 ---> x > -3. Solving for x, x + 3 = 4x -3 ---> 6 = 3x ---> x = 2 ( solution accepted since x > -3)
| x + 3| = -(x +3 ) for x + 3 < 0 --> x < -3. Solving for x, -x - 3 = 4x -3 5x = 0 ---> x = 0 ( solution discarded as x is not < -3)
A is sufficient.
b. |x -3| = |2x -3| |x -3| = x -3 for x-3 >= 0 ---> x >= 3 |x -3| = -(x -3) for x-3 < 0 ---> x < 3
|2x -3 | = 2x -3 for 2x -3 >= 0 ----> x >=3/2 |2x -3 | = -(2x -3) for 2x -3 < 0 ----> x < 3/2
So we have 3 ranges
1) x >=3 ==> x - 3 = 2x -3 ====> x = 0 ; discard 2) 3/2 < x < 3 ===> -(x-3) = 2x -3 ====> -x + 3 = 2x -3 ===> x =2 ( accepted solution ) 3) x < 3/2 ===> -(x-3) = -(2x -3) ====> x = 3 (discarded the solution)
Let me know if I have solved the question correctly. I know the process is lengthy.
One more question, if we consider the only acceptable solution in statement b i.e., x =2 (case 3/2 < x < 3), then both statements are sufficient independently and we get the answer as option (D).
Please discuss.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11522
Followers: 1795
Kudos [?]:
9551
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
25 Feb 2012, 10:52
saxenaashi wrote: Bunnel, For statement one, I understand that you have not solved for x in your solution. I am still learning the abs value and in equalities. Can you share your thoughts on the following solution (solving for x in both statements)
a. |x+3| = 4x -3 |x+3| = x + 3 for x + 3 >= 0 ---> x > -3. Solving for x, x + 3 = 4x -3 ---> 6 = 3x ---> x = 2 ( solution accepted since x > -3)
| x + 3| = -(x +3 ) for x + 3 < 0 --> x < -3. Solving for x, -x - 3 = 4x -3 5x = 0 ---> x = 0 ( solution discarded as x is not < -3)
A is sufficient.
b. |x -3| = |2x -3| |x -3| = x -3 for x-3 >= 0 ---> x >= 3 |x -3| = -(x -3) for x-3 < 0 ---> x < 3
|2x -3 | = 2x -3 for 2x -3 >= 0 ----> x >=3/2 |2x -3 | = -(2x -3) for 2x -3 < 0 ----> x < 3/2
So we have 3 ranges
1) x >=3 ==> x - 3 = 2x -3 ====> x = 0 ; discard 2) 3/2 < x < 3 ===> -(x-3) = 2x -3 ====> -x + 3 = 2x -3 ===> x =2 ( accepted solution ) 3) x < 3/2 ===> -(x-3) = -(2x -3) ====> x = 3 (discarded the solution)
Let me know if I have solved the question correctly. I know the process is lengthy.
One more question, if we consider the only acceptable solution in statement b i.e., x =2 (case 3/2 < x < 3), then both statements are sufficient independently and we get the answer as option (D).
Please discuss.
Regards It seems that you understand this method very well. Everything is correct except the red parts: -(x-3) = -(2x -3) --> x=0 (not x=3), so it's also a valid solution. Hence for (2) you have two valid solutions x=2 and x=0 (just like in my post above), which makes this statement not sufficient. Hope it's clear.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2011
Posts: 24
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
25 Feb 2012, 11:07
Bunuel wrote: saxenaashi wrote: Bunnel, For statement one, I understand that you have not solved for x in your solution. I am still learning the abs value and in equalities. Can you share your thoughts on the following solution (solving for x in both statements)
a. |x+3| = 4x -3 |x+3| = x + 3 for x + 3 >= 0 ---> x > -3. Solving for x, x + 3 = 4x -3 ---> 6 = 3x ---> x = 2 ( solution accepted since x > -3)
| x + 3| = -(x +3 ) for x + 3 < 0 --> x < -3. Solving for x, -x - 3 = 4x -3 5x = 0 ---> x = 0 ( solution discarded as x is not < -3)
A is sufficient.
b. |x -3| = |2x -3| |x -3| = x -3 for x-3 >= 0 ---> x >= 3 |x -3| = -(x -3) for x-3 < 0 ---> x < 3
|2x -3 | = 2x -3 for 2x -3 >= 0 ----> x >=3/2 |2x -3 | = -(2x -3) for 2x -3 < 0 ----> x < 3/2
So we have 3 ranges
1) x >=3 ==> x - 3 = 2x -3 ====> x = 0 ; discard 2) 3/2 < x < 3 ===> -(x-3) = 2x -3 ====> -x + 3 = 2x -3 ===> x =2 ( accepted solution ) 3) x < 3/2 ===> -(x-3) = -(2x -3) ====> x = 3 (discarded the solution)
Let me know if I have solved the question correctly. I know the process is lengthy.
One more question, if we consider the only acceptable solution in statement b i.e., x =2 (case 3/2 < x < 3), then both statements are sufficient independently and we get the answer as option (D).
Please discuss.
Regards It seems that you understand this method very well. Everything is correct except the red parts: -(x-3) = -(2x -3) --> x=0 (not x=3), so it's also a valid solution. Hence for (2) you have two valid solutions x=2 and x=0 (just like in my post above), which makes this statement not sufficient. Hope it's clear. Works. Thanks for pointing out the mistake and quick response too. I am just learning this so working ground up, hence I am not hesitant in taking long route initially. After next few questions, I would be tuned to extract the ranges  I guess. Is there a condition on squaring the sides of the equation or inequation. Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11522
Followers: 1795
Kudos [?]:
9551
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
25 Feb 2012, 11:15
saxenaashi wrote: Works. Thanks for pointing out the mistake and quick response too. I am just learning this so working ground up, hence I am not hesitant in taking long route initially. After next few questions, I would be tuned to extract the ranges  I guess. Is there a condition on squaring the sides of the equation or inequation. Regards A. We can raise both parts of an inequality to an even power if we know that both parts of an inequality are non-negative (the same for taking an even root of both sides of an inequality).For example: 2<4 --> we can square both sides and write: 2^2<4^2; 0\leq{x}<{y} --> we can square both sides and write: x^2<y^2; But if either of side is negative then raising to even power doesn't always work. For example: 1>-2 if we square we'll get 1>4 which is not right. So if given that x>y then we can not square both sides and write x^2>y^2 if we are not certain that both x and y are non-negative. B. We can always raise both parts of an inequality to an odd power (the same for taking an odd root of both sides of an inequality).For example: -2<-1 --> we can raise both sides to third power and write: -2^3=-8<-1=-1^3 or -5<1 --> -5^2=-125<1=1^3; x<y --> we can raise both sides to third power and write: x^3<y^3. So in statement (2) since both parts of expression are non-negative we can safely apply squaring. Hope it helps.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
27 Feb 2012, 23:09
Well, I have a little bit another solution for this problem Consider (1): if x>-3 then x+3=4x-3, so x=2, sufficient if x<-3, then -x-3=4x-3, which Leeds to answer x=0, which is wrong because we consider only x<-3 Sum up (1) is sufficient The saim logic can be applied to the (2), and it is possible to derive that (2) is sufficient So the answer is D either (1) is sufficient or (2) is sufficient In your logic, you gave a mistake, because you've missed the root. Posted from GMAT ToolKit
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11522
Followers: 1795
Kudos [?]:
9551
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
27 Feb 2012, 23:30
terance wrote: Well, I have a little bit another solution for this problem Consider (1): if x>-3 then x+3=4x-3, so x=2, sufficient if x<-3, then -x-3=4x-3, which Leeds to answer x=0, which is wrong because we consider only x<-3 Sum up (1) is sufficient The saim logic can be applied to the (2), and it is possible to derive that (2) is sufficient So the answer is D either (1) is sufficient or (2) is sufficient In your logic, you gave a mistake, because you've missed the root. Posted from GMAT ToolKitWelcome to GMAT Club. Unfortunately your answer is not correct: OA for this question is A, not D (you can see it under the spoiler in the initial post). (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| has two roots x=0 and x=2 (just substitute these values to see that they both satisfy the given equation), so you can not get the single numerical value of x, which makes this statement insufficient. You can refer to above solutions for two different approaches of how to get these roots for (2). Please ask if anything remains unclear.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 196
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 4
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
15 Apr 2012, 15:38
A simple solution for this is solve for x in each statement, but remember when you solve for x with abs value you must make the term positive and negative. in both cases you will find x = +# and zero. plug the numbers back into the equation and you will find zero will not fit the equation so x must be > 0
_________________
DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 272
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 20
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
17 Apr 2012, 06:19
dvinoth86 wrote: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| Liked the question? encourage by giving kudos  Remember: When you have || on both sides of eqn you do not need to VERIFY the answer by putting them back in eqn BUT when you have || on only one side you MUST VERIFY the answer by putting them back in eqn(1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 a) x + 3 = 4x – 3 => x=2 .. VALID b) -(x + 3) = 4x – 3 => x=0 .. INVALID Hence Sufficient (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| => x = 0 or 6 .. INVALID Hence In-Sufficient
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
17 Apr 2012, 08:19
Is this a correct way to approach 2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| ? Step 1: (x-3) = (2x-3) => x = 0 Substitute x = 0 in |x – 3| = |2x – 3| => VALID
Step 2: (x-3) = -(2x-3) => x = 2 Substitute x = 2 in |x – 3| = |2x – 3| => VALID
So 2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| is NOT SUFFICIENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 272
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 20
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
17 Apr 2012, 08:41
kirncha wrote: Is this a correct way to approach 2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| ? Step 1: (x-3) = (2x-3) => x = 0 Substitute x = 0 in |x – 3| = |2x – 3| => VALID
Step 2: (x-3) = -(2x-3) => x = 2 Substitute x = 2 in |x – 3| = |2x – 3| => VALID
So 2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| is NOT SUFFICIENT Yes but you can skip the substitution part, read my statement above
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 3
|
Re: [tricky one] Is x > 0? [#permalink]
18 Apr 2012, 07:46
Bunuel wrote: Is x > 0?
(1) |x+3|=4x-3 --> LHS is an absolute value, which is always non-negative (|some \ expression|\geq{0}), so RHS must also be non-negative --> 4x-3\geq{0} --> x\geq{\frac{3}{4}}, hence x>0. Sufficient. You can see here that you don't even need to find exact value(s) of x to answer the question.
(2) |x-3|=|2x-3|. Square both sides: (x-3)^2=(2x-3)^2 --> (2x-3)^2-(x-3)^2=0. Apply a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b), rather than squaring: --> x(3x-6)=0 --> x=0 or x=2. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Hope it helps. Pretty slick answer. Saves a lot of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 68
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
09 May 2013, 13:38
Hi Bunuel This is how I solved the 2 statements, http://campl.us/fWdgqiT5EsKand I get 0 & 2 for both statements, can u tell me what wrong am I doing? Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Life is very similar to a boxing ring. Defeat is not final when you fall down… It is final when you refuse to get up and fight back!
1 Kudos = 1 thanks Nikhil
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11522
Followers: 1795
Kudos [?]:
9551
[1] , given: 826
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
10 May 2013, 02:01
1
This post received KUDOS
nikhil007 wrote: Hi Bunuel This is how I solved the 2 statements, http://campl.us/fWdgqiT5EsKand I get 0 & 2 for both statements, can u tell me what wrong am I doing? Posted from my mobile device  If you substitute x=0 in |x + 3| = 4x – 3 you'll get: LHS=|x + 3|=3 and RHS=4x – 3=-3, thus LHS\neq{RHS}, which means that x=0 is not the root of the given equation. When expanding |x+3|: When x<-3, then |x+3|=-(x+3), so in this case we'll have -(x+3)=4x-3 --> x=0 --> discard this value since 0 is not less than -3 (we consider the range when x<-3). When x>=-3, then |x+3|=x+3, so in this case we'll have x+3=4x-3 --> x=2 --> this value of x is OK since 2>-3. So, |x + 3| = 4x - 3 has only one root, x=2. Hope it's clear.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 68
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| [#permalink]
11 May 2013, 06:07
Bunuel wrote: nikhil007 wrote: Hi Bunuel This is how I solved the 2 statements, http://campl.us/fWdgqiT5EsKand I get 0 & 2 for both statements, can u tell me what wrong am I doing? Posted from my mobile device  If you substitute x=0 in |x + 3| = 4x – 3 you'll get: LHS=|x + 3|=3 and RHS=4x – 3=-3, thus LHS\neq{RHS}, which means that x=0 is not the root of the given equation. When expanding |x+3|: When x<-3, then |x+3|=-(x+3), so in this case we'll have -(x+3)=4x-3 --> x=0 --> discard this value since 0 is not less than -3 (we consider the range when x<-3). When x>=-3, then |x+3|=x+3, so in this case we'll have x+3=4x-3 --> x=2 --> this value of x is OK since 2>-3. So, |x + 3| = 4x - 3 has only one root, x=2. Hope it's clear. Thanks Bunuel, this is how I solve the Modulus questions, so as a rule i guess, I should check both values by putting them back in eq, I use to think that they both are the roots since I considered both scenarios, ie one with |X+3| and one with -(x+3). I guess I will have to add this additional step in my methodology. Thanks.
_________________
Life is very similar to a boxing ring. Defeat is not final when you fall down… It is final when you refuse to get up and fight back!
1 Kudos = 1 thanks Nikhil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3|
[#permalink]
11 May 2013, 06:07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|