Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 03 May 2015, 03:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3

Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 181
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 [#permalink]  01 Jul 2007, 08:52
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (03:24) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

(2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3|
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 306
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

my vote for A.

Statement1) /x+3/>=0 so 4x-3>=0 from which x>=3/4 SUFF.

Statement2) /x-3/=/2x-3/ only x=0 or x=2 satisfy this equation: Insuff.
Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 170
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

E

From A , X= 0 or 2 so insuff

also from B X =0 or 2 so insuff

both together dont tell anything.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: DS - x > 0? [#permalink]  03 Jul 2007, 07:13
iamba wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

(2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3|

Stmt 1:
case 1: x>-3
x+3 = 4x-3
=> x = 2

case 2: x<-3
-(x+3) = 4x-3
=> x = 0

case 3: x=-3
4x-3 = 0
=> x = 3/4

Hence, insufficient.

Stmt 2:
case 1: x<3/2
-(x-3) = -(2x-3)
=> x = 0

case 2: x=3/2
-(x-3) = 0
=> x = 3

case 3: 3/2 < x < 3
-(x-3) = 2x-3
=> x = 2

case 4: x=3
2x-3 = 0
=> x = 3/2

case 5: x>3
x-3 = 2x - 3
=> x = 0

Hence, insufficient.

From both statements, x=0 or x=2. Hence, insufficient.
Therefore, E.
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

X can not be 0. Put 0 in (1) and you get 3 = -3

I agree with UMB.

Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

---In statement 1 we have two possible value for X
we have X=2 or X=0 but if we replace the value one can see that the restriction of the inequalityonly allows for X=2
because When X equal 0 we end up with |3|=-3 which is impossible
SUFFICIENT

---Statement 2 we have also two possibilities X=0 and X=2
restrictions in the stem does not allows us to determine if x is = to zero or higher.
INSUFFICIENT

I go for A
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 384
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

I am also with A. This is my reasoning.

From Stmt1. I took 4x - 3 >= 0 => x >= 3/4. Is this reasoning right ?
Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 780
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Mine is 'A'

Stmt1 : x =2 So SUFF

Stmt2: for x< 3/2, x =0
for 3/2<x<3 , x = 2

So INSUFF
Director
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 549
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Initially i thought it was E, but now i go with A since 1 results in either x=0 or x=2, if you substitute , you can easily ifnid out that x can be only 2. So this is sufficient. Therefor i go with A. (2 however is insufficient as explained earlier in this thread)
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 1 21 Jul 2008, 23:38
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 7 30 Mar 2008, 11:46
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 11 24 Nov 2007, 05:37
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 8 31 Oct 2007, 06:49
Is x > 0, 1. |x + 3| = 4x - 3 2. |x - 3| = |2x -3| 6 18 Aug 2007, 15:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by