Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Sep 2014, 11:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 181
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2007, 08:52
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (03:24) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

(2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3|
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2007, 09:21
my vote for A.

Statement1) /x+3/>=0 so 4x-3>=0 from which x>=3/4 SUFF.

Statement2) /x-3/=/2x-3/ only x=0 or x=2 satisfy this equation: Insuff.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 170
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 06:56
E

From A , X= 0 or 2 so insuff

also from B X =0 or 2 so insuff

both together dont tell anything.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 350
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS - x > 0? [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 07:13
iamba wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

(2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3|


Stmt 1:
case 1: x>-3
x+3 = 4x-3
=> x = 2

case 2: x<-3
-(x+3) = 4x-3
=> x = 0

case 3: x=-3
4x-3 = 0
=> x = 3/4

Hence, insufficient.

Stmt 2:
case 1: x<3/2
-(x-3) = -(2x-3)
=> x = 0

case 2: x=3/2
-(x-3) = 0
=> x = 3

case 3: 3/2 < x < 3
-(x-3) = 2x-3
=> x = 2

case 4: x=3
2x-3 = 0
=> x = 3/2

case 5: x>3
x-3 = 2x - 3
=> x = 0

Hence, insufficient.

From both statements, x=0 or x=2. Hence, insufficient.
Therefore, E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 07:45
1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

X can not be 0. Put 0 in (1) and you get 3 = -3

I agree with UMB.

Answer is A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 07:45
---In statement 1 we have two possible value for X
we have X=2 or X=0 but if we replace the value one can see that the restriction of the inequalityonly allows for X=2
because When X equal 0 we end up with |3|=-3 which is impossible
SUFFICIENT

---Statement 2 we have also two possibilities X=0 and X=2
restrictions in the stem does not allows us to determine if x is = to zero or higher.
INSUFFICIENT

I go for A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 11:15
I am also with A. This is my reasoning.

From Stmt1. I took 4x - 3 >= 0 => x >= 3/4. Is this reasoning right ?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 782
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2007, 04:17
Mine is 'A'

Stmt1 : x =2 So SUFF

Stmt2: for x< 3/2, x =0
for 3/2<x<3 , x = 2

So INSUFF
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 549
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2007, 07:45
Initially i thought it was E, but now i go with A since 1 results in either x=0 or x=2, if you substitute , you can easily ifnid out that x can be only 2. So this is sufficient. Therefor i go with A. (2 however is insufficient as explained earlier in this thread)
  [#permalink] 04 Jul 2007, 07:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
62 Experts publish their posts in the topic Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3 (2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3| dvinoth86 37 22 Feb 2012, 18:59
Experts publish their posts in the topic Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 chineseburned 7 30 Mar 2008, 11:46
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 alimad 11 24 Nov 2007, 05:37
Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3 jimjohn 8 31 Oct 2007, 06:49
Is x > 0, 1. |x + 3| = 4x - 3 2. |x - 3| = |2x -3| asaf 6 18 Aug 2007, 15:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is x > 0? (1) |x + 3| = 4x 3 (2) |x 3| = |2x 3

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.