Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

(1) x+1 is even --> clearly insufficient, x+1 could be 2 or 30.

(2) x+1 is a factor of 2 and 3 --> 2 and 3 are consecutive integers, consecutive integers are co-prime, which means that they do not share ANY common factor but 1 (for example 5 and 6, two consecutive integers share only one common factor: 1). So as x+1 is a factor of BOTH 2 and 3 then x+1=1 and 1 is a factor of 12. Sufficient.

(1) x+1 is even --> clearly insufficient, x+1 could be 2 or 30.

(2) x+1 is a factor of 2 and 3 --> 2 and 3 are consecutive integers, consecutive integers are co-prime, which means that they do not share ANY common factor but 1 (for example 5 and 6, two consecutive integers share only one common factor: 1). So as x+1 is a factor of BOTH 2 and 3 then x+1=1 and 1 is a factor of 12. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Bunuel,

The reason I chose E was because of the case where x = 5

(1) x+1 is even --> clearly insufficient, x+1 could be 2 or 30.

(2) x+1 is a factor of 2 and 3 --> 2 and 3 are consecutive integers, consecutive integers are co-prime, which means that they do not share ANY common factor but 1 (for example 5 and 6, two consecutive integers share only one common factor: 1). So as x+1 is a factor of BOTH 2 and 3 then x+1=1 and 1 is a factor of 12. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Bunuel,

The reason I chose E was because of the case where x = 5

x + 1 - even x + 1 = 6 is factor of both 2 & 3

But 12 is not a factor of 6

6 is NOT a factor (divisor) of neither 2 nor 3. _________________

Bunnel according to statement1 X+1 is even but in our second statement we have derived X+1=1 which is an odd number .In real GMAT questions i do u think this kind of contradiction will be there in the two statements given ??? _________________

"Giving kudos" is a decent way to say "Thanks" and motivate contributors. Please use them, it won't cost you anything

Re: Is x+1 a factor of 12? [#permalink]
21 Dec 2012, 20:12

Hiho wrote:

Hi everyone!

I might've missed something. But I got a question.

Isn't statement (1) contradicting statement (2)?

(1) -> x+1 = even

(2) -> x+1 is a factor of 2 and 3. (Which gives us x+1 = 1)

Wouldn't that mean that statement (1) is false?

Again, I might've missed something.

x+1 is a factor of both 2 and 3 that means the sum of x+1 can divide both 2 and 3 three. You see three no value common that divide both 2 and 3 other than 1 . 12 is also divisible by 1. Ans. B _________________

Bunnel according to statement1 X+1 is even but in our second statement we have derived X+1=1 which is an odd number .In real GMAT questions i do u think this kind of contradiction will be there in the two statements given ???

On the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other.

Re: Is x+1 a factor of 12? [#permalink]
03 Mar 2014, 12:18

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________