subhashghosh wrote:

2^24 > 5^10 is quite obvious, you can't calculate it without a computer (Btw, I didn't do so). You can reckon that the number of exponents is so big ( > twice that of RHS) that LHS will be > RHS.

I don't consider that inequality to be obvious at all. If instead you were asked if 2^22 > 5^10 was true, you would be misled if you simply compared the exponents. 2^22 = (2^11)^2 = (2048)^2, whereas 5^10 = (5^5)^2 = (3125)^2, so 5^10 is certainly bigger than 2^22.

I'm not sure there's a convenient way to answer the question in the original post unless you notice that one power of 2, namely 2^10, is very close to a power of 10. Since 2^10 = 1024, then we have:

x > 2^34 = (2^4)(2^10)^3 = 16*(1024)^3 > 16*(10^3)^3 = 16*(10^9) > 10*10^9 = 10^10

so x > 10^10, and Statement 1 is sufficient. It's such a specialized 'trick' that we need here that I don't consider the question particularly valuable to study - you are extremely unlikely to need to do anything similar on the actual GMAT.

Statement 2 is clearly sufficient without doing any work: we know the value of x, so we can compare it to any number at all.

The answer is D.

_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com