Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

This is how the answer is presented in MGMAT: Question: X^3>X^2? Rephrase: X^3 - X^2>0? Rephrase again: X^2(X-1)>0?

Both terms must be positive or negative, because we have an inequality in the form of xy>0. X^2 can never be negative, so we just need to know that both X^2>0 (meaning X is non zero) and X>1. Since every number greater than 1 is non-zero, we can rephrase the question to: X>1?

Statement 1 tells us: X is positive. Insufficient. Statement 2 tells us: X^2>X, so X<0 OR X>1. Insufficient.

I have been trying to understand inequalities by reading MGMAT's VIC book and am confused. I was trying to solve a few problems and had some questions. I'd appreciate your help...

MGMAT VIC book (Inequalities : Advanced Set) Page 187, Problem 9:

No posting of PS/DS questions is allowed in the main Math forum.

2.You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\). Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from). Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

Also note that in your example there is only one inequality and MGMAT solution just manipulates within it.

Back to the original question:

Is x^3 > x^2?

Is \(x^3 > x^2\)? --> is \(x^3-x^2>0\)? --> is \(x^2(x-1)>0\)? --> this inequality holds true for \(x>1\). So the question basically asks whether \(x>1\).

(1) x > 0. Not sufficient. (2) x^2 > x --> \(x(x-1)>0\) --> \(x<0\) or \(x>1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) gives: \(x>1\). Sufficient.

I have seen addition and subtraction of two inequalities. It helps us solve many inequality question. Usually, the inequalities can be subtracted when two inequalities have opposite sign;

1<2 ---A 100>50 ----B

Subtract B from A because the two inequalities have opposite signs; first inequality has "<" sign and second inequality has ">". 1-100<2-50 ; The sign "<" will remain that of A's -99<-48

Perhaps you will need to read gmatclub's Number properties.

Coming to the question: Is X^3 > X^2? 1) X>0 2) X^2 > X

X^3>X^2 X^3-X^2>0 X^2(X-1)>0 X>1

Question is reduced to: Is X>1?

1. X>0. So, X can be greater than 1 or smaller than 1. Not sufficient.

2. X^2 > X X^2-X>0 X(X-1)>0 X>1 or X<0 Not Sufficient.

Step 1) The first thing I notice is that one exponent is odd and the other is even. So I immediately know what it's testing.

Step 2)I know I need to check positive and negative...but I also need to check fractions as well.

Check positive/negative: If x = 2, then of course x^3 > x^2 [GOOD] If x= -2, then x^3 is NOT > x^2 [NO GOOD]

So (A) and (D) are no good since there's inconsistency here with GOOD/NO GOOD. For now, I don't need to check fractions. Just evaluate (2) for now.

Step 3) Evaluating (2): x^2 > x Genearlly, squaring a number means it gets bigger. BUT--I know there's an exception--FRACTIONS! If x = 1/2, then (1/2)^2 = (1/4) So when you square a fraction, it actually gets smaller! OK, so (2) is telling us: "Let's use only non-fractions."

Obviously, if we plug in a normal number like 3, it's gonna be a [TRUE] statement. What happens if we plugin a negative number to x^3 > x^2? Try x=-2. Well, then you'd get -8>+4 [FALSE]. So with x=+2, you get TRUE, but with x=-2, you get FALSE. .

So since you sometimes get FALSE and sometimes get TRUE---then you know this conflict means (B) is NO GOOD!

Step 4) But what about if you combine (1) and (2) together.

Well, (1) basically tells us we can restrict x to be positive. (2) basically tells us we can restrict x to be only non-fractions.

So what if we only use x values that are positive AND non-fractions. That means x>=1.

Can we answer this original question definitively?

Is x^3 > X^2?

Well, when we only use x>1, then this statement is ALWAYS true. So voila!

When we combine (1) and (2) we can restrict the scope of possible X's to only those that are POSITIVE and NON-FRACTIONS--which means x>1.

Turns out this works out great. So we can choose (C) is the final answer.

Thank you all for the awesome explanations. It makes more sense now.

"You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If a>b and c<d (signs in opposite direction: > and <) --> a-c>b-d (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from). Example: 3<4 and 5>1 --> 3-5<4-1."

I have been trying to understand inequalities by reading MGMAT's VIC book and am confused. I was trying to solve a few problems and had some questions. I'd appreciate your help...

MGMAT VIC book (Inequalities : Advanced Set) Page 187, Problem 9:

No posting of PS/DS questions is allowed in the main Math forum.

2.You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\). Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from). Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

Also note that in your example there is only one inequality and MGMAT solution just manipulates within it.

Back to the original question:

Is x^3 > x^2?

Is \(x^3 > x^2\)? --> is \(x^3-x^2>0\)? --> is \(x^2(x-1)>0\)? --> this inequality holds true for \(x>1\). So the question basically asks whether \(x>1\).

(1) x > 0. Not sufficient. (2) x^2 > x --> \(x(x-1)>0\) --> \(x<0\) or \(x>1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) gives: \(x>1\). Sufficient.

Thanks for the detailed post. I apologize for posting this in the wrong forum - duly noted.

Now while trying to follow your logic, I seem to come to a dead end. Please help me out here - You solved (2) x^2 > x --> x(x-1)>0 --> x<0 or x>1. Not sufficient. What did you do to arrive at this conclusion. The way I see it, x(x-1)>0 is an xy inequality...where x can be -ve and y +ve OR vice versa Therefore X>0 and X<1 OR X<0 and X>1

What's wrong with my logic here?

Finally, how do we get (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) gives: x>1. Sufficient.

I have seen addition and subtraction of two inequalities. It helps us solve many inequality question. Usually, the inequalities can be subtracted when two inequalities have opposite sign;

1<2 ---A 100>50 ----B

Subtract B from A because the two inequalities have opposite signs; first inequality has "<" sign and second inequality has ">". 1-100<2-50 ; The sign "<" will remain that of A's -99<-48

Perhaps you will need to read gmatclub's Number properties.

Coming to the question: Is X^3 > X^2? 1) X>0 2) X^2 > X

X^3>X^2 X^3-X^2>0 X^2(X-1)>0 X>1

Question is reduced to: Is X>1?

1. X>0. So, X can be greater than 1 or smaller than 1. Not sufficient.

2. X^2 > X X^2-X>0 X(X-1)>0 X>1 or X<0 Not Sufficient.

Combining both; X>1. Sufficient.

Ans: "C"

Thanks for the answer, I have a question here too...how did you arrive at this conclusion: X^3>X^2 X^3-X^2>0 X^2(X-1)>0 X>1

The way I see it: X^2(X-1)>0 is an xy>0 solution where either x>0 and y<0 OR x<0 and y>0 Therefore in this case, X^2>0 and X-1<0 which means X>0 and X<1 ----- (A) OR X^2<0 and X-1>0 which means X<0 and X>1 ----- (B)

When we combine statements 1 and 2 we know that X>0 in (1) Therefore (B) is not possible because X cannot be less than 0...what am I doing wrong here...

Finally, how do we get (1)+(2) Intersection of the ranges from (1) and (2) gives: x>1. Sufficient.

I'll stay away from the top part of your question. As for the bottom: [quote2gmatpill]Well, (1) basically tells us we can restrict x to be positive. (x>0) (2) basically tells us we can restrict x to be only values outside of the -1 to 1 range.

So what if we only use x values that are positive AND non-fractions. That means x>1.[/quote2]

Hope that helps! By the way, be careful with all these symbols and calculations you are doing. The GMAT tests your REASONING skills and your ability to "make sense" of it. I may be wrong--but I get the sense you're getting too bogged down on the nitty gritty details yet don't really understand how to translate the math symbols into logic and reasoning.

Thanks for the answer, I have a question here too...how did you arrive at this conclusion: X^3>X^2 X^3-X^2>0 X^2(X-1)>0 X>1

The way I see it: X^2(X-1)>0 is an xy>0 solution where either x>0 and y<0 OR x<0 and y>0 Therefore in this case, X^2>0 and X-1<0 which means X>0 and X<1 ----- (A) OR X^2<0 and X-1>0 which means X<0 and X>1 ----- (B)

When we combine statements 1 and 2 we know that X>0 in (1) Therefore (B) is not possible because X cannot be less than 0...what am I doing wrong here...

X^2(X-1)>0 is an xy>0 solution where either x>0 and y<0 OR x<0 and y>0

This is not correct.

If a*b > 0; It means either a and b are both +ve OR a and b are both -ve. If a*b < 0; It means either a is +ve and b is -ve OR a is -ve and b is +ve.

X^2(X-1)>0

Here; either X^2 and (X-1) are both negative OR X^2 and (X-1) are both +ve

X^2 can't be -ve. Note: A square can never be a negative value. It can be 0 or +ve. X^2 is also not 0. Because if X=0; then X^2=0; That will make X^2(X-1) = 0; but X^2(X-1)>0. Thus, X is not 0.

So, X^2 is +ve and X-1 is also +ve. X-1>0 X>1 and X>0 Combing both; X>1.

So; the ultimate question becomes; Is X>1

1. This statement tells us that X>0. X can be 0.5<1 or 2>1. Thus not sufficient.

2. X^2>X X^2-X>0 X(X-1)>0

Again a*b>0; a +ve and b+ve OR a-ve and b-ve

X(X-1)>0 X>0 and X-1>0 i.e. X>1 Combing both; X>1 OR X<0 and X-1<0 i.e. X<1 Combing both; X<0

We have X>1 or X<0 Not sufficient.

Combing both; Statement 1 tells us that X>0 Statement 2 tells us that X could be less than 0 or greater than 1. Since St 1 tells us that X>0; we can ignore the St2 condition where it says X<0. Thus, X>0 and X>1. Means X>1

C. ***************************************************

This was little cumbersome for me in the beginning. But, with adequate practice and guidance from Bunuel, I am getting hold of it. Yet to become an exponent though. It's really proven fruitful for me.

Thanks for the answer, I have a question here too...how did you arrive at this conclusion: X^3>X^2 X^3-X^2>0 X^2(X-1)>0 X>1

The way I see it: X^2(X-1)>0 is an xy>0 solution where either x>0 and y<0 OR x<0 and y>0 Therefore in this case, X^2>0 and X-1<0 which means X>0 and X<1 ----- (A) OR X^2<0 and X-1>0 which means X<0 and X>1 ----- (B)

When we combine statements 1 and 2 we know that X>0 in (1) Therefore (B) is not possible because X cannot be less than 0...what am I doing wrong here...

X^2(X-1)>0 is an xy>0 solution where either x>0 and y<0 OR x<0 and y>0

This is not correct.

If a*b > 0; It means either a and b are both +ve OR a and b are both -ve. If a*b < 0; It means either a is +ve and b is -ve OR a is -ve and b is +ve.

X^2(X-1)>0

Here; either X^2 and (X-1) are both negative OR X^2 and (X-1) are both +ve

X^2 can't be -ve. Note: A square can never be a negative value. It can be 0 or +ve. X^2 is also not 0. Because if X=0; then X^2=0; That will make X^2(X-1) = 0; but X^2(X-1)>0. Thus, X is not 0.

So, X^2 is +ve and X-1 is also +ve. X-1>0 X>1 and X>0 Combing both; X>1.

So; the ultimate question becomes; Is X>1

1. This statement tells us that X>0. X can be 0.5<1 or 2>1. Thus not sufficient.

2. X^2>X X^2-X>0 X(X-1)>0

Again a*b>0; a +ve and b+ve OR a-ve and b-ve

X(X-1)>0 X>0 and X-1>0 i.e. X>1 Combing both; X>1 OR X<0 and X-1<0 i.e. X<1 Combing both; X<0

We have X>1 or X<0 Not sufficient.

Combing both; Statement 1 tells us that X>0 Statement 2 tells us that X could be less than 0 or greater than 1. Since St 1 tells us that X>0; we can ignore the St2 condition where it says X<0. Thus, X>0 and X>1. Means X>1

C. ***************************************************

This was little cumbersome for me in the beginning. But, with adequate practice and guidance from Bunuel, I am getting hold of it. Yet to become an exponent though. It's really proven fruitful for me.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

The range of inequality can also be found out by using the 'Wavy Line' method. It's a powerful method of solving inequalities especially when you have trouble in finding the range algebraically. Let me illustrate briefly how to use this method.

Finding Range of \(x^3 - x^2 > 0\) through 'Wavy Line' method.

We can simplify the expression to \(x^2 (x -1) > 0\). Now, the LHS of the inequality becomes 0 at 0 and 1. So, {0, 1} are the zero points of the inequality.

Plot these points on the number line and start from the top right corner and draw a Wavy Line. Be ready to alternate the region of the wave based on how many times a a point is root to the equation. If the power of a term is odd, the wave simply passes through the point into the other region. If the power of a term is even, the wave bounces back to the same region. In this case, power of the term was 2 for the zero point 0, hence the wave bounced back.

The range of the inequality will be +ve for region above the number line and -ve for region below the number line.

We observe from the graph that the range is +ve when \(x > 1\). So, all we need is to find from the statements- I & II is if \(x >1\) or not.

Statement-I St-I tells us that \(x > 0\). This does not tell us for sure if \(x >1\). Hence, the statement is insufficient.

Statement-II- Finding Range of \(x^2 -x >0\) through Wavy Line method

The expression in st-II can be simplified to \(x(x-1) > 0\). Let's find the range by the Wavy Line method. The zero points of the expression are { 0,1}. The Wavy Line graph would be represented in the manner shown below:

We see that the value of the inequality is +ve for \(x < 0\) and \(x > 1\). But the inequality in the question statement is +ve only when \(x > 1\). Hence, Statement-II is insufficient.

Combining Statement-I & II If we combine both the statements, we can infer that \(x > 1\), which is what we needed. Hence, combining both the statements is sufficient to answer the question.

You can practice a similar question atis-x-196185.html. Try solving it by Wavy Line method.

This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES and taking advantage of the built-in Number Properties that exist in this question.

We're asked if X^3 > X^2. This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: X > 0

IF... X = 1 1^1 is NOT > 1^2 and the answer to the question is NO

IF.... X = 2 2^3 IS > 2^2 and the answer to the question is YES Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

Fact 2: X^2 > X

IF.... X = 2 2^3 IS > 2^2 and the answer to the question is YES

IF.... X = -1 (-1)^3 is NOT > (-1)^2 and the answer to the question is NO Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know.... X > 0 X^2 > X

The combined Facts really 'limit' the possible values of X: Since X > 0, X MUST be positive. Since X^2 > X, X CANNOT be a positive fraction (between 0 and 1). X also CANNOT = 1.

By extension, X MUST be > 1. In ALL of these situations, X^3 will be greater than X^2, so the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES. Combined, SUFFICIENT

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...