Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The expression can be rephrased as : Is 1/x > x ? stmt 1. The expression is true for x < 0 except x=-1. But there is no restriction on x. So insuff. stmt 2. Value of n does not matter.

combining , still the same question, can x be -1 ( and also be < 0 )? Hence E.

The expression can be rephrased as : Is 1/x > x ? stmt 1. The expression is true for x < 0 except x=-1. But there is no restriction on x. So insuff. stmt 2. Value of n does not matter.

combining , still the same question, can x be -1 ( and also be < 0 )? Hence E.

Now, while reducing the given inequality we need to take care of the inequality sign. ONLY if a -ve value is multiplied/divided on BOTH sides of the equation we need to reverse the inequality.

But, in this case we are not multiplying or dividing each side. We are just canceling out the same factor(-ve or +ve) from each side. So the inequality will remain the same.

In other words, x^n/x^n = 1, regardless of the sign of x^n. So, basically we are just multiplying each side by 1

The expression can be rephrased as : Is 1/x > x ? stmt 1. The expression is true for x < 0 except x=-1. But there is no restriction on x. So insuff. stmt 2. Value of n does not matter.

combining , still the same question, can x be -1 ( and also be < 0 )? Hence E.

Re: Is x^n/x^n+1 > x^n+1/x^n? (1) x < 0 (2) n < 0 [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2014, 02:57

tejal777 wrote:

Is x^n/x^(n+1)>x^(n+1)/x^n?

(1) x < 0

(2) n < 0

Sol: Given question can be rephrased as is 1/x>x ------> (1-x^2)/x>0

Given x<0, let x=-2 then the above equation holds true but if x= -1/2 then the equation doesn't hold true (1-1/4)/-1/2 ------>3/4/-1/2---->-6/4 or -3/2 which is less than 0 Ans Statement A is not sufficient

A and D ruled out

St2: given n<0 -----> There is no use for it. Hence B ruled out With both statements we still don't have anything new.

Hence Ans E
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: Is x^n/x^n+1 > x^n+1/x^n? (1) x < 0 (2) n < 0 [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Sep 2015, 23:24

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is

the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the

problem. Remember equal number of variables and equations ensures a solution.

Is x^n/x^(n+1)>x^(n+1)/x^n?

(1) x < 0

(2) n < 0

==>transforming the original condition and the question by variable approach method, we have x^n/x^(n+1)>x^(n+1)/x^n? --> 1/x>x?. multiplying x^2 to both sides (since multiplying square values maintain the direction of the inequality sign), x>x^3? , x^3-x>0?, x(x-1)(x+1)>0? gives us -1<x<0 or 1<x?. Using both 1) and 2), the range of que doesn't include the range of con. Therefore E is the answer.
_________________

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Since my last post, I’ve got the interview decisions for the other two business schools I applied to: Denied by Wharton and Invited to Interview with Stanford. It all...