Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Let's check in which ranges of \(x\) expression \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true:

Two check points for \(x\): 0 and 1 (x=0 and x-1=0, x=1), thus three ranges to check: A. \(x<0\) --> \(-x-x+1=1\) --> \(x=0\), not good as we are checking for \(x<0\); B. \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) --> \(x-x+1=1\) --> \(1=1\), which is true. This means that in this range given equation holds true for all x-es; C. \(x>1\) --> \(x+x-1=1\) --> \(x=1\), not good as we are checking for \(x>1\).

So we got that the equation \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true only in the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\).

(1) \(x \geq 0\). Not sufficient. (2) \(x \leq 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) gives us the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\), which is exactly the range for which given equation holds true. Sufficient.

stmt1: x >= 0 => x is positive, if we apply this to eq 1, we cannot say that 2x-1 = 1 cos x can be >= 0 but less than 1 so insuff stmt2: x<=1 => if we apply this to eq 1, we cannot say that 2x-1 = 1 cos x<=1 can lead to negative numbers also.

both stmt taken together 0<= x <= 1 x is a fraction between 0 to 1 so always x + 1-x = 1 in our case |x| will be x and |x - 1| is actually value of 1-x so it will always be 1 this is why C both the stmts are reqd.
_________________

Let's check in which ranges of \(x\) expression \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true:

Two check points for \(x\): 0 and 1 (x=0 and x-1=0, x=1), thus three ranges to check: A. \(x<0\) --> \(-x-x+1=1\) --> \(x=0\), not good as we are checking for \(x<0\); B. \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) --> \(x-x+1=1\) --> \(1=1\), which is true. This means that in this range given equation holds true for all x-es; C. \(x>1\) --> \(x+x-1=1\) --> \(x=1\), not good as we are checking for \(x>1\).

So we got that the equation \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true only in the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\).

(1) \(x \geq 0\). Not sufficient. (2) \(x \leq 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) gives us the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\), which is exactly the range for which given equation holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Can you please clarify as to how is \(x-x+1=1\) derived inB when it is provided that \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) that means X is +ve.

Let's check in which ranges of \(x\) expression \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true:

Two check points for \(x\): 0 and 1 (x=0 and x-1=0, x=1), thus three ranges to check: A. \(x<0\) --> \(-x-x+1=1\) --> \(x=0\), not good as we are checking for \(x<0\); B. \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) --> \(x-x+1=1\) --> \(1=1\), which is true. This means that in this range given equation holds true for all x-es; C. \(x>1\) --> \(x+x-1=1\) --> \(x=1\), not good as we are checking for \(x>1\).

So we got that the equation \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true only in the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\).

(1) \(x \geq 0\). Not sufficient. (2) \(x \leq 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) gives us the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\), which is exactly the range for which given equation holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Can you please clarify as to how is \(x-x+1=1\) derived inB when it is provided that \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) that means X is +ve.

Thanks !!!

When \(x\) is in the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) then \(|x|=x\) and \(|x-1|=-(x-1)=-x+1\), thus \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) in this range becomes \(x-x+1=1\).

I have got the answer as E. Can someone please clarify, what is wrong in my approach ?

Statement 1: X>=0

I assume X as 0 |0|+|0-1|= |0|+|1|= 1 ------------> Equation satisfied

I assume X as 3/4 |3/4|+|(3/4)-1|= |3/4|+|1/4|= 2 ----------> Equation unsatisfied

Statement 1 is not sufficient

Statement 2: X<=1

I assume X as 1 |1|+|1-1|= |1|+|0|= 1 --------------> Equation satisfied

I assume X as 3/4 again |3/4|+|(3/4)-1|= |3/4|+|1/4|= 2 ----------> Equation unsatisfied

Statement 2 is not sufficient

Taking together both the equation, I assume X as 0, 3/4 and 1

When X=0, the answer is 1--------> Equation satisfied When X=3/4, the answer is 2---------> Equation unsatisfied When X=1, the answer is 1----------> Equation satisfied

Hence answer choice E is correct.

Clarifications needed, please.
_________________

A Ship in port is safe but that is not what Ships are built for !

l x l + lx-1l= 1 implies that sum of distance of x from 0 and from 1 should be 1. We can easily see that the distance between 0 and 1 is 1. So, x can lie on 0, on 1 or anywhere in between 0 and 1. It cannot go beyond 1 or before 0 because then the sum of the distance will become larger than 1. Both statements together tell you that 0 <= x <= 1 and hence, the equation will hold for all such values of x. Answer (C)
_________________

I have got the answer as E. Can someone please clarify, what is wrong in my approach ?

Statement 1: X>=0

I assume X as 0 |0|+|0-1|= |0|+|1|= 1 ------------> Equation satisfied

I assume X as 3/4 |3/4|+|(3/4)-1|= |3/4|+|1/4|= 2 ----------> Equation unsatisfied

Statement 1 is not sufficient

Statement 2: X<=1

I assume X as 1 |1|+|1-1|= |1|+|0|= 1 --------------> Equation satisfied

I assume X as 3/4 again |3/4|+|(3/4)-1|= |3/4|+|1/4|= 2 ----------> Equation unsatisfied

Statement 2 is not sufficient

Taking together both the equation, I assume X as 0, 3/4 and 1

When X=0, the answer is 1--------> Equation satisfied When X=3/4, the answer is 2---------> Equation unsatisfied When X=1, the answer is 1----------> Equation satisfied

Hence answer choice E is correct.

Clarifications needed, please.

The correct answer is C, not E.

If x = 3/4, then Is |x| + |x-1| = |3/4| + |3/4 - 1| = 3/4 + 1/4 = 1.

Wouldn't that imply that for both cases of x (where we have positive and negative values inside the | | signs) the equation is true?

Thanks!

No. In the first case for an \(x=\frac{1}{2}\) (\(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\)) you get that the equation is true \(1=1\) it's like saying ALWAYS TRUE. But in the second case for an \(x>1\) you get x=1, but since x>1 that is not true Statement 1 is not sufficient
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

x>1 |x| + |x-1| = 1 x + (x-1) = 1 2x = 2 x = 1 x = 1 which ISN'T greater than 1. Insufficient

0≤x<1 x = 1/2 |x| + |x-1| = 1 x + -(x-1) =1 x+ -x +1 = 1 0=0 I'm not sure how to read this. Does 0=0 mean that the statement is sufficient or does it mean that x=0 and because x≥0 the statement is sufficient?

Thanks!

Zarrolou wrote:

WholeLottaLove wrote:

Is |x| + |x-1| = 1?

For #1 (x≥0) I see two possible cases:

x=1/2 x+ -(x-1)=1 x+ -x+1=1 1=1

OR

x=2 x+x-1=1 2x=2 x=1

Wouldn't that imply that for both cases of x (where we have positive and negative values inside the | | signs) the equation is true?

Thanks!

No. In the first case for an \(x=\frac{1}{2}\) (\(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\)) you get that the equation is true \(1=1\) it's like saying ALWAYS TRUE. But in the second case for an \(x>1\) you get x=1, but since x>1 that is not true Statement 1 is not sufficient

x>1 |x| + |x-1| = 1 x + (x-1) = 1 2x = 2 x = 1 x = 1 which ISN'T greater than 1. Insufficient

0≤x<1 x = 1/2 |x| + |x-1| = 1 x + -(x-1) =1 x+ -x +1 = 1 0=0 I'm not sure how to read this. Does 0=0 mean that the statement is sufficient or does it mean that x=0 and because x≥0 the statement is sufficient?

Thanks!

0=0, and 1=1,... means that that equation is always true. You should read the results as follow: x>1 x = 1 which ISN'T greater than 1. So in this case the equation if FALSE (as 1 does not equal a value greater than 1) 0≤x<1 0=0. So in this case the equation in TRUE( because 0=0 always)

So from statement 1 you get two different results (F/T)=> not sufficient
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

x>1 |x| + |x-1| = 1 x + (x-1) = 1 2x = 2 x = 1 x = 1 which ISN'T greater than 1. Insufficient

0≤x<1 x = 1/2 |x| + |x-1| = 1 x + -(x-1) =1 x+ -x +1 = 1 0=0 I'm not sure how to read this. Does 0=0 mean that the statement is sufficient or does it mean that x=0 and because x≥0 the statement is sufficient?

Thanks!

0=0, and 1=1,... means that that equation is always true. You should read the results as follow: x>1 x = 1 which ISN'T greater than 1. So in this case the equation if FALSE (as 1 does not equal a value greater than 1) 0≤x<1 0=0. So in this case the equation in TRUE( because 0=0 always)

So from statement 1 you get two different results (F/T)=> not sufficient

So the '=' sign can be put with x > 0 or with x < 0. We usually put it with 'x > 0' for consistency.

When we are considering ranges, say, x < -8 ------ x is less than -8 -8 <= x < -3 ------- x is greater than or equal to -8 but less than -3 -3 <= x < 4 ------- x is greater than or equal to -3 but less than 4 x >=4 -------- x is greater than or equal to 4

We need to include the transition points (-8, -3, 4) somewhere so we include them with greater than sign.

Mind you, we could have taken the ranges as x <= -8 -8 < x <= -3 -3 < x <= 4 x > 4

The above explanation is easily understandable but it creates a small doubt if i compare it with this question Is |x| + |x-1| = 1? (1) \(x\geq{0}\) (2) \(x\leq{1}\)

Quote:

Two check points for \(x\): 0 and 1 (x=0 and x-1=0, x=1), thus three ranges to check: A. \(x<0\) --> \(-x-x+1=1\) --> \(x=0\), not good as we are checking for \(x<0\); B. \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\) --> \(x-x+1=1\) --> \(1=1\), which is true. This means that in this range given equation holds true for all x-es; C. \(x>1\) --> \(x+x-1=1\) --> \(x=1\), not good as we are checking for \(x>1\).

So we got that the equation \(|x|+|x-1|=1\) holds true only in the range \(0\leq{x}\leq{1}\)

Here, we have to include the transition points (0 and 1) but only once. Are these okay, for B. \(0\leq{x}<1\) --> 1=1 not in the range. for C. \(x\geq{1}\) --> x = 1. It is in the range.

Or

A. \(x\leq{0}\) --> x= 0, It is in the range. B. \(0<{x}\leq{1}\) --> 1=1 It is also in the range.

Are my ranges correct ? if yes, then i still don't feel close to the answer.

1. From 1st equation , if x = 1 , then |x| + |x-1| = 1 , then its yes if x = 5 , 9 # 1 , so No so Equation 1 is No 2. From 2nd equation , of x = -1 , then its No x = 1 its yes so equation is No

3. using both , x = 0 then its Definite yes So C..

Is my approach is Right
_________________

I welcome analysis on my posts and kudo +1 if helpful. It helps me to improve my craft.Thank you

1. From 1st equation , if x = 1 , then |x| + |x-1| = 1 , then its yes if x = 5 , 9 # 1 , so No so Equation 1 is No 2. From 2nd equation , of x = -1 , then its No x = 1 its yes so equation is No

3. using both , x = 0 then its Definite yes So C..

Is my approach is Right

Using both, you get 0 <= x <= 1 x can lie anywhere from 0 to 1. Just trying the extreme values is not a good idea. You must try some values from the middle too i.e. x = 1/2, 1/4 etc.

Though establishing something by plugging in values is always tricky. You can try to negate a universal statement by looking for one value for which the statement doesn't hold but since you cannot try every value for which a statement must hold, its treacherous to depend on number plugging in this case. You should try to use logic.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...