Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

1) does not talk about x. Insufficient 2) implies y<1. Sufficient

Answer : b

Morning!

I'm just beginning to study for the GMAT and have a very weak quant background. I answered this question correctly but it took me 5 minutes to do so. I need to find ways to save time, could you explain to me why you noted that "1) does not talk about x. Insufficient" ? It seems like you removed choice A quickly.

This is probably a terribly novice question but I'm a novice so, I hope you don't mind!

1) does not talk about x. Insufficient 2) implies y<1. Sufficient

Answer : b

Morning!

I'm just beginning to study for the GMAT and have a very weak quant background. I answered this question correctly but it took me 5 minutes to do so. I need to find ways to save time, could you explain to me why you noted that "1) does not talk about x. Insufficient" ? It seems like you removed choice A quickly.

This is probably a terribly novice question but I'm a novice so, I hope you don't mind!

Cheers, f

After manipulating the question stem (subtracting x on both sides) we are only left with y to determine...since Statement 1 gives x but says nothing about y, which is what we are looking for it is immediately insufficient
_________________

After manipulating the question stem (subtracting x on both sides) we are only left with y to determine...since Statement 1 gives x but says nothing about y, which is what we are looking for it is immediately insufficient

Ah, I see that now. I need to notice the significance of things like this more quickly. Thank you for the answer.

1) I think you're thinking on lines of multiplying/dividing by x for inequalities, which can be done without flipping inequality sign only when we know whether the number is positive.

2) Even if the sign of x is not given, you know that on both sides of inequality the sign of x is same so you can cancel that out.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

1) I think you're thinking on lines of multiplying/dividing by x for inequalities, which can be done without flipping inequality sign only when we know whether the number is positive.

2) Even if the sign of x is not given, you know that on both sides of inequality the sign of x is same so you can cancel that out.

Subhash .. thanks for your reply .. Does this mean that we need to consider the positive/negative scenario ONLY in case we are multiplying/dividing the equation by a variable? So in this case, we dont need to consider the positive/negative scenario.

Subhash .. thanks for your reply .. Does this mean that we need to consider the positive/negative scenario ONLY in case we are multiplying/dividing the equation by a variable? Yes, in case of inequalities, for equalities it doesn't matter.

So in this case, we dont need to consider the positive/negative scenario. No _________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...