Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
26 May 2012, 02:09

7

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

raviram80 wrote:

Hi all,

The process that I went through was

reverse the sign of the second equation

-x + 2y > 6 (to make the signs same for both equations)

and

solve for y to get y>4

Now for solving x

Do you solve the equations again for x

or

how does it work by substituting y > 4 ? Could someone show this method and also tell me if this is the best way to solve these questions.

Thanks Ravi

Is xy>0?

Note that question basically asks whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign.

(1) x-y > -2 --> we can have an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=10\) and \(y=1\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is positive and \(y\) is negative (\(x=10\) and \(y=-10\)). Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y <-6 --> again it' easy to get an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=1\) and \(y=10\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is negative and \(y\) is positive (\(x=-1\) and \(y=10\)). Not sufficient.

You can get that the the two statement individually are not sufficient in another way too: we have (1) \(y<x+2\) and (2) \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\). We are asked whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign or whether the points (x,y) are in the I or III quadrant ONLY. But all (x,y) points below the line \(y=x+2\) (for 1) and all (x, y) points above the line \(y=\frac{x}{2}+3\) can not lie only I or III quadrant: points above or below some line (not parallel to axis) lie at least in 3 quadrants.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(x-y-(x-2y)>-2-(-6)\) --> \(y>4\). As \(y>4\) and (from 1) \(x>y-2\) then \(x>2\) (because we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction, so: \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\)) --> we have that \(y>4\) and \(x>2\): both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. Sufficient.

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
12 Mar 2013, 09:28

Bunuel wrote:

tech3 wrote:

Hello, I have a doubt.

After we have got y >4, do we check both the equations for consistency? With the first equation, m getting x >2 but with the second, I am receiving x<2 upon solving. What am I doing wrong

Can you please show how you get x<2?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bunuel, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4 If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
18 Mar 2013, 12:04

adding both equations, you would get y >4. Substituting this to equation 1, you would get x > 2! Hence both x and y are positive, so xy > 0 _________________

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
15 Jul 2013, 16:12

pleaman wrote:

dolumoks wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Hello, I have a doubt.

After we have got y >4, do we check both the equations for consistency? With the first equation, m getting x >2 but with the second, I am receiving x<2 upon solving. What am I doing wrong

Can you please show how you get x<2?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bunuel, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4 If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)

Agree! I cant understand the same )

I have the same doubt, with y>4 , put the value in 2nd equation, and you have -negative values for x. _________________

And many strokes, though with a little axe, hew down and fell the hardest-timbered oak. - William Shakespeare

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
15 Jul 2013, 21:37

Expert's post

nikhiil wrote:

pleaman wrote:

dolumoks wrote:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bunuel, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4 If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)

Agree! I cant understand the same )

I have the same doubt, with y>4 , put the value in 2nd equation, and you have -negative values for x.

But if you use y>4 and x-y > -2 you'll get that x>2. It's more restrictive so it's correct. _________________

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
31 Jul 2014, 06:19

Bunuel wrote:

Graphic approach:

Attachment:

xy.png

Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel,

I have doubts on graphical method -->

why is line y<x+2 passing through x = -2 ? the value of x should be greater than -2 (the line may pass through x = -1, 0, 1, 2, ...) Similarly, why is line y > (x/2) + 3 passing through x = -6 the value of x should be less than -6 (the line may pass through x = -7, -8, -9,...)

With the graphical method, can you illustrate solution of following example ?

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]
31 Jul 2014, 06:40

Expert's post

AkshayDavid wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Graphic approach:

Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel,

I have doubts on graphical method -->

why is line y<x+2 passing through x = -2 ? the value of x should be greater than -2 (the line may pass through x = -1, 0, 1, 2, ...) Similarly, why is line y > (x/2) + 3 passing through x = -6 the value of x should be less than -6 (the line may pass through x = -7, -8, -9,...)

With the graphical method, can you illustrate solution of following example ?

Is x + y > 0 ?

1) x - y > 0 2) x^2 - y^2 > 0

Regards, Akshay

y < x + 2 is the region which lies BELOW (because of < sign) line y = x + 2.

y > x/2 + 3 is the region which lies ABOVE (because of > sign) line y = x/2 + 3.

Type of Visa: You will be applying for a Non-Immigrant F-1 (Student) US Visa. Applying for a Visa: Create an account on: https://cgifederal.secure.force.com/?language=Englishcountry=India Complete...

I started running back in 2005. I finally conquered what seemed impossible. Not sure when I would be able to do full marathon, but this will do for now...