Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 May 2012, 03:09

7

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

8

This post was BOOKMARKED

raviram80 wrote:

Hi all,

The process that I went through was

reverse the sign of the second equation

-x + 2y > 6 (to make the signs same for both equations)

and

solve for y to get y>4

Now for solving x

Do you solve the equations again for x

or

how does it work by substituting y > 4 ? Could someone show this method and also tell me if this is the best way to solve these questions.

Thanks Ravi

Is xy>0?

Note that question basically asks whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign.

(1) x-y > -2 --> we can have an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=10\) and \(y=1\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is positive and \(y\) is negative (\(x=10\) and \(y=-10\)). Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y <-6 --> again it' easy to get an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=1\) and \(y=10\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is negative and \(y\) is positive (\(x=-1\) and \(y=10\)). Not sufficient.

You can get that the the two statement individually are not sufficient in another way too: we have (1) \(y<x+2\) and (2) \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\). We are asked whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign or whether the points (x,y) are in the I or III quadrant ONLY. But all (x,y) points below the line \(y=x+2\) (for 1) and all (x, y) points above the line \(y=\frac{x}{2}+3\) can not lie only I or III quadrant: points above or below some line (not parallel to axis) lie at least in 3 quadrants.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(x-y-(x-2y)>-2-(-6)\) --> \(y>4\). As \(y>4\) and (from 1) \(x>y-2\) then \(x>2\) (because we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction, so: \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\)) --> we have that \(y>4\) and \(x>2\): both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. Sufficient.

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Mar 2013, 10:28

Bunuel wrote:

tech3 wrote:

Hello, I have a doubt.

After we have got y >4, do we check both the equations for consistency? With the first equation, m getting x >2 but with the second, I am receiving x<2 upon solving. What am I doing wrong

Can you please show how you get x<2?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bunuel, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4 If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Mar 2013, 13:04

adding both equations, you would get y >4. Substituting this to equation 1, you would get x > 2! Hence both x and y are positive, so xy > 0 _________________

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jul 2013, 17:12

pleaman wrote:

dolumoks wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Hello, I have a doubt.

After we have got y >4, do we check both the equations for consistency? With the first equation, m getting x >2 but with the second, I am receiving x<2 upon solving. What am I doing wrong

Can you please show how you get x<2?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bunuel, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4 If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)

Agree! I cant understand the same )

I have the same doubt, with y>4 , put the value in 2nd equation, and you have -negative values for x. _________________

And many strokes, though with a little axe, hew down and fell the hardest-timbered oak. - William Shakespeare

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jul 2013, 22:37

Expert's post

nikhiil wrote:

pleaman wrote:

dolumoks wrote:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bunuel, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4 If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative) and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)

Agree! I cant understand the same )

I have the same doubt, with y>4 , put the value in 2nd equation, and you have -negative values for x.

But if you use y>4 and x-y > -2 you'll get that x>2. It's more restrictive so it's correct. _________________

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2014, 07:19

Bunuel wrote:

Graphic approach:

Attachment:

xy.png

Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel,

I have doubts on graphical method -->

why is line y<x+2 passing through x = -2 ? the value of x should be greater than -2 (the line may pass through x = -1, 0, 1, 2, ...) Similarly, why is line y > (x/2) + 3 passing through x = -6 the value of x should be less than -6 (the line may pass through x = -7, -8, -9,...)

With the graphical method, can you illustrate solution of following example ?

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2014, 07:40

Expert's post

AkshayDavid wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Graphic approach:

Is xy > 0?

\(xy>0\) means that x and y must have the same sign, so point (x, y) must be either in the first or the third quadrant (green regions).

(1) x-y > -2 --> \(y<x+2\) --> the area below blue line (\(y=x+2\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y < -6 --> \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\) --> the area above red line (\(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\)). (x, y) may or may not be in green region. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Below blue line and above red line, is yellow region, which is entirely in I quadrant (where \(y>4\) and \(x>2\)) --> \(xy>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel,

I have doubts on graphical method -->

why is line y<x+2 passing through x = -2 ? the value of x should be greater than -2 (the line may pass through x = -1, 0, 1, 2, ...) Similarly, why is line y > (x/2) + 3 passing through x = -6 the value of x should be less than -6 (the line may pass through x = -7, -8, -9,...)

With the graphical method, can you illustrate solution of following example ?

Is x + y > 0 ?

1) x - y > 0 2) x^2 - y^2 > 0

Regards, Akshay

y < x + 2 is the region which lies BELOW (because of < sign) line y = x + 2.

y > x/2 + 3 is the region which lies ABOVE (because of > sign) line y = x/2 + 3.

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 May 2015, 20:37

Hi,

I approached the 1&2 decision the same way as Bunuel but just had a clarifying question. When we subtract the two inequalities from eachother..how do we know that the sign stays as greater than (i.e. how do we know that it's y>4 instead of y<4). I assumed it was y>4 and got the question correct because i was subtracting a less than equation from a greater than equation but I have a feeling that's not the right logic. Thanks!

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 May 2015, 01:32

5

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

healthjunkie wrote:

Hi,

I approached the 1&2 decision the same way as Bunuel but just had a clarifying question. When we subtract the two inequalities from eachother..how do we know that the sign stays as greater than (i.e. how do we know that it's y>4 instead of y<4). I assumed it was y>4 and got the question correct because i was subtracting a less than equation from a greater than equation but I have a feeling that's not the right logic. Thanks!

Let me help you out with such operations on inequalities.

Assume two inequalities x + y > 10......(1) & x - y < 2........(2)

We see here that both the inequalities have opposite signs.

The basic concept of the inequality says to convert the inequalities into same sign before adding or subtracting them.

We can change the sign of the inequality by multiplying -1 on both sides of the inequality. Let's do it on inequality (2)

x - y < 2, multiplying -1 on both sides we get -x + y > -2.

Since we have inequality (1) & (2) with the same signs we can add them now

x + y -x + y > 10 -2 i.e. y > 4.

Note here that adding inequality (1) to inequality (2) after multiplying inequality (2) by -1 is similar to subtracting inequality (2) from inequality (1). This concept is used when we say that we can subtract two inequalities with opposite signs.

In this question you asked we subtracted inequality in st-II from inequality in st-I which incidentally meant that st-II was multiplied by -1 and then added to st-I. So, the sign of inequality in st-II flipped.

x - 2y < -6, multiplying it with -1 gave the inequality -x + 2y > 6 which was then added to inequality in st-I

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Apr 2016, 05:40

Bunuel wrote:

Is xy>0?

Note that question basically asks whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign.

(1) x-y > -2 --> we can have an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=10\) and \(y=1\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is positive and \(y\) is negative (\(x=10\) and \(y=-10\)). Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y <-6 --> again it' easy to get an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=1\) and \(y=10\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is negative and \(y\) is positive (\(x=-1\) and \(y=10\)). Not sufficient.

You can get that the the two statement individually are not sufficient in another way too: we have (1) \(y<x+2\) and (2) \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\). We are asked whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign or whether the points (x,y) are in the I or III quadrant ONLY. But all (x,y) points below the line \(y=x+2\) (for 1) and all (x, y) points above the line \(y=\frac{x}{2}+3\) can not lie only I or III quadrant: points above or below some line (not parallel to axis) lie at least in 3 quadrants.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(x-y-(x-2y)>-2-(-6)\) --> \(y>4\). As \(y>4\) and (from 1) \(x>y-2\) then \(x>2\) (because we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction, so: \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\)) --> we have that \(y>4\) and \(x>2\): both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. Sufficient.

However, the combined solving of eqns gave me, x<-4 or x>-1, a case in which we cannot comment on sign of x. Can you please help me understand where I have gone wrong?

Attachments

IMG_20160401_163125.jpg [ 2.2 MiB | Viewed 2811 times ]

Re: Is xy > 0? (1) x - y > -2 (2) x - 2y < -6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Apr 2016, 07:30

Expert's post

Alok322 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Is xy>0?

Note that question basically asks whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign.

(1) x-y > -2 --> we can have an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=10\) and \(y=1\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is positive and \(y\) is negative (\(x=10\) and \(y=-10\)). Not sufficient.

(2) x-2y <-6 --> again it' easy to get an YES answer, if for example \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive (\(x=1\) and \(y=10\)) as well as a NO answer, if for example \(x\) is negative and \(y\) is positive (\(x=-1\) and \(y=10\)). Not sufficient.

You can get that the the two statement individually are not sufficient in another way too: we have (1) \(y<x+2\) and (2) \(y>\frac{x}{2}+3\). We are asked whether \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign or whether the points (x,y) are in the I or III quadrant ONLY. But all (x,y) points below the line \(y=x+2\) (for 1) and all (x, y) points above the line \(y=\frac{x}{2}+3\) can not lie only I or III quadrant: points above or below some line (not parallel to axis) lie at least in 3 quadrants.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(x-y-(x-2y)>-2-(-6)\) --> \(y>4\). As \(y>4\) and (from 1) \(x>y-2\) then \(x>2\) (because we can add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction, so: \(y+x>4+(y-2)\) --> \(x>2\)) --> we have that \(y>4\) and \(x>2\): both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive. Sufficient.

However, the combined solving of eqns gave me, x<-4 or x>-1, a case in which we cannot comment on sign of x. Can you please help me understand where I have gone wrong?

Hi, your Equations are further to be simplified..

you got 2y-6 > x> y-2 we can infer 2y-6>y-2... or 2y-y>6-2 that is y>4.. if y>4 and x+2>y, x will be >2.. thus both x and y are +ive and our answer is YES for xy>0..

Do not substitute value in 2y-6 > x> y-2 and find the signs of x and y.. _________________

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

I’m a little delirious because I’m a little sleep deprived. But whatever. I have to write this post because... I’M IN! Funnily enough, I actually missed the acceptance phone...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...

This highly influential bestseller was first published over 25 years ago. I had wanted to read this book for a long time and I finally got around to it...