Is xy > 0? 1. x-y>-2 2. x-2y<-6 : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 18:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is xy > 0? 1. x-y>-2 2. x-2y<-6

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 50
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Is xy > 0? 1. x-y>-2 2. x-2y<-6 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2006, 14:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is xy > 0?

1. x-y>-2
2. x-2y<-6
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 440
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2006, 17:05
Sam Kana wrote:
Is xy > 0?

1. x-y>-2
2. x-2y<-6

E also.

x or y can be zero and satisfy both 1 and 2 or they can be non-zero and satisfy
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 340
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2006, 19:51
I am getting C

Individually not sufficient.

Hint 2 can be written as
(x - y) â€“ y < -6
Here (x â€“y) part is > -2, so y has to be positive and greater than 4

So y > 4

(x â€“ y) > -2, here if y > 4, x has to be positive. Negative x will make the value of (x - y) lesser than -4.

As both x and y are positive, xy > 0

Last edited by anindyat on 28 Oct 2006, 20:33, edited 1 time in total.
VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1381
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2006, 20:11
anindyat wrote:
I am getting C ..but not sure

Individually not sufficient.

Hint 2 can be written as
(x - y) â€“ y < -6
Here (x â€“y) part is > -2, so y has to be positive and greater than 4

So y > 4

(x â€“ y) > -2, here if y > 4, x has to be positive. Negative x will make the value of (x - y) lesser than -4.

As both x and y are positive, xy > 0

I think it is C the same explanation above
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1797
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2006, 00:56
For me (C) as well.

I prefer to draw a XY plan and identify the points (X,Y) such that the equations alone and then together are verified. I believe it's very fast

Stat 1

x-y>-2
<=> y < x + 2 : it means that we consider all points (x,y) that are "under" the line x+2.

I represent the area in green in Fig-1. As we can see, the whole cadran (IV) is in the area, a cadran where x > 0 and y < 0. Thus, x*y < 0.
Meanwhile, part of cadran (I) is covered, in which x > 0 and y > 0. For this case, x*y > 0.

INSUFF.

Stat 2

x-2y<-6
<=> y > x/2 + 3 : it means that we consider all points (x,y) that are "above" the line x/2 + 3

I represent the area in green in Fig-2.
We can see here:
o Part of cadran (II) is covered. That means x < 0 and y > 0 and so x*y <0
o Part of cadran (I) is covered. That means x > 0 and y > 0 and so x*y >0

INSUFF.

Using (1) and (2):

We have to be at same time "under" the line x+2 and "above" the line x/2 + 3. I used a "flashy" green colour to reperesent the area.

Thus, the area is only a part of the cadran (I) where x > 0 and y > 0. Thus, x*y > 0

SUFF.
Attachments

Fig-1_y-inf-to-x+2.jpg [ 19.2 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]

Fig-2_y-sup-to-x-div-2+3.jpg [ 17.03 KiB | Viewed 741 times ]

Fig-3_both.jpg [ 22.67 KiB | Viewed 742 times ]

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 50
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2006, 03:50
Yes 'C' it is...I like the graphics method, it is more generic and eleminates the thinking process...!
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1797
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2006, 08:20
Sam Kana wrote:
Yes 'C' it is...I like the graphics method, it is more generic and eleminates the thinking process...!

I agree... We can conclude very fast with it
29 Oct 2006, 08:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by