Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Isosceles Triangle [#permalink]
27 Nov 2007, 17:41

Skewed wrote:

See diagram.

Please Explain.

Thanks.

B for me.

(1) is not sufficient because if both triangles have the same area, using the area formula, and given that both have the same height, D is the mid point of AC. However, knowing this you cannot tell if the triangle is isso.
INSUFFICIENT

(2) SUFFICIENT because using Pyt theorem, the hyp of each triangle must be the same.

Re: Isosceles Triangle [#permalink]
27 Nov 2007, 19:12

bkk145 wrote:

Skewed wrote:

See diagram.

Please Explain.

Thanks.

B for me.

(1) is not sufficient because if both triangles have the same area, using the area formula, and given that both have the same height, D is the mid point of AC. However, knowing this you cannot tell if the triangle is isso. INSUFFICIENT

(2) SUFFICIENT because using Pyt theorem, the hyp of each triangle must be the same.

For I, if the areas are the same, then D is the midpoint of AC right. So if AD= CD, then BD would have bisected AC. So isn't BD an angle bisector of angle ABC as well?

Re: Isosceles Triangle [#permalink]
27 Nov 2007, 21:27

Skewed wrote:

bkk145 wrote:

Skewed wrote:

See diagram.

Please Explain.

Thanks.

B for me.

(1) is not sufficient because if both triangles have the same area, using the area formula, and given that both have the same height, D is the mid point of AC. However, knowing this you cannot tell if the triangle is isso. INSUFFICIENT

(2) SUFFICIENT because using Pyt theorem, the hyp of each triangle must be the same.

For I, if the areas are the same, then D is the midpoint of AC right. So if AD= CD, then BD would have bisected AC. So isn't BD an angle bisector of angle ABC as well?

Yes, according to stat 1, angle ABD = angle DBC. But that does not make the triangle isoceles. That's only one angle of triangle ABD = one angle of triangle DBC.

Stat 1:
Since areas are equal: 1/2 *AD * h = 1/2 DC*h or AD=DC. But we cannot prove similarity or another angle of both triangles equal using this. Insuff.

Stat 2:
angle ABD = angle DBC
angle BDA = angle BDC
Suff.

Re: Isosceles Triangle [#permalink]
27 Nov 2007, 22:29

GK_Gmat wrote:

Skewed wrote:

bkk145 wrote:

Skewed wrote:

See diagram.

Please Explain.

Thanks.

B for me.

(1) is not sufficient because if both triangles have the same area, using the area formula, and given that both have the same height, D is the mid point of AC. However, knowing this you cannot tell if the triangle is isso. INSUFFICIENT

(2) SUFFICIENT because using Pyt theorem, the hyp of each triangle must be the same.

For I, if the areas are the same, then D is the midpoint of AC right. So if AD= CD, then BD would have bisected AC. So isn't BD an angle bisector of angle ABC as well?

Yes, according to stat 1, angle ABD = angle DBC. But that does not make the triangle isoceles. That's only one angle of triangle ABD = one angle of triangle DBC.

Stat 1: Since areas are equal: 1/2 *AD * h = 1/2 DC*h or AD=DC. But we cannot prove similarity or another angle of both triangles equal using this. Insuff.

Stat 2: angle ABD = angle DBC angle BDA = angle BDC Suff.

B

But doesn't the height or the altitude have to be perpendicular to the base? Thereby creating a right triangle - ADB = 90=CDB??

Re: Isosceles Triangle [#permalink]
27 Nov 2007, 23:46

Skewed wrote:

GK_Gmat wrote:

Skewed wrote:

bkk145 wrote:

Skewed wrote:

See diagram.

Please Explain.

Thanks.

B for me.

(1) is not sufficient because if both triangles have the same area, using the area formula, and given that both have the same height, D is the mid point of AC. However, knowing this you cannot tell if the triangle is isso. INSUFFICIENT

(2) SUFFICIENT because using Pyt theorem, the hyp of each triangle must be the same.

For I, if the areas are the same, then D is the midpoint of AC right. So if AD= CD, then BD would have bisected AC. So isn't BD an angle bisector of angle ABC as well?

Yes, according to stat 1, angle ABD = angle DBC. But that does not make the triangle isoceles. That's only one angle of triangle ABD = one angle of triangle DBC.

Stat 1: Since areas are equal: 1/2 *AD * h = 1/2 DC*h or AD=DC. But we cannot prove similarity or another angle of both triangles equal using this. Insuff.

Stat 2: angle ABD = angle DBC angle BDA = angle BDC Suff.

B

But doesn't the height or the altitude have to be perpendicular to the base? Thereby creating a right triangle - ADB = 90=CDB??

The height does have to be perpendicular to the base--but BD isn't necessarily the height. If ADB and CDB aren't right angles, then you would have to drop a perpendicular from B to an extension of the line AC for the height. (Note that the height of a triangle isn't necessarily contained inside the triangle.)

Another way of looking at it: given statement 1, it's possible that BD is perpendicular to AC, in which case ABC is isosceles. But it's also possible that ABC looks just like the drawing, with AD = CD, but ADB < CDB, so that AB < CB.

gmatclubot

Re: Isosceles Triangle
[#permalink]
27 Nov 2007, 23:46

It’s been a long time, since I posted. A busy schedule at office and the GMAT preparation, fully tied up with all my free hours. Anyways, now I’m back...

Ah yes. Funemployment. The time between when you quit your job and when you start your MBA. The promised land that many MBA applicants seek. The break that every...

It is that time of year again – time for Clear Admit’s annual Best of Blogging voting. Dating way back to the 2004-2005 application season, the Best of Blogging...