Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jul 2016, 09:38
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is a mistake to give post office employees individual

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 0

It is a mistake to give post office employees individual [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2010, 07:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (02:10) correct 48% (01:29) wrong based on 187 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open “suspicious” packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee’s idle curiosity.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
* Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
* Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
* The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
* There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
* Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.

Source <v05>
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

------------------------------------
Waiting for KUDOS

Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 148
Location: Toronto
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

Re: Post office employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2010, 12:46
BellTheGmat wrote:
It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open “suspicious” packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee’s idle curiosity.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
* Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
* Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
* The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
* There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
* Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.


For assumption questions, we want to deconstruct the argument: paraphrase the conclusion and evidence. Once we have done so, we then identify the missing link between the two.

In this case, the author concludes that it's a mistake to allow postal workers discretion regarding inspecting packages. Why? Because (so here comes the evidence...) curiousity and boredom will lead to all packages being opened.

What does the author have to be assuming to reach his conclusion based on his evidence? That postal workers do, in fact, want to know what's inside the packages.

So, armed with that prediction, we attack the choices looking for a match.

A) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
B) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
C) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
D) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
E) aha! Here's exactly what we predicted, we know (E) is correct.

Kaplan's denial test can be a very useful tool for assumption questions. If we weren't already convinced that (E) is correct, we'd consider the opposite of (E):

Quote:
Postal workers do not desire to open packages out of curiousity.


Well, if postal workers aren't curious, the author's argument makes no sense at all. Since the denial of (E) destroys the argument, (E) must be an essential element, the exact definition of an assumption.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8815
Followers: 773

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: It is a mistake to give post office employees individual [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2015, 05:56
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 1632
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.56
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 107

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: It is a mistake to give post office employees individual [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2016, 21:10
BellTheGmat wrote:
It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open “suspicious” packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee’s idle curiosity.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
* Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
* Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
* The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
* There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
* Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.

Source <v05>


bu the % of each answer choice, I see I am not the only one who was thinking between B and E.
A - irrelevant.
B - even if they are distinguishable, it does not mean that the postal employees would not open other packages out of curiosity.
C - efficiency of postal service is out of scope
D - even if there was such a protocol, employees would still open the packages out of curiosity.
E - if we negate this one, the conclusion does not stand anymore. so E it is.
Re: It is a mistake to give post office employees individual   [#permalink] 18 Mar 2016, 21:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 It is a mistake to give post office employees individual nitin6305 13 12 Aug 2013, 14:38
17 It is a mistake to give post office employees individual BellTheGmat 21 20 Nov 2010, 07:22
13 Brownlea s post office must be replaced with a larger one. RaviChandra 26 13 May 2010, 11:03
The less frequently employees leave the office for a serbiano 5 21 Jan 2010, 00:42
2 Brownlea s post office must be replaced with a larger one. gmatavenue 14 19 Apr 2009, 08:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is a mistake to give post office employees individual

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.