It is a mistake to give post office employees individual : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 22:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# It is a mistake to give post office employees individual

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [1] , given: 0

It is a mistake to give post office employees individual [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2010, 06:18
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (02:11) correct 47% (01:29) wrong based on 200 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open “suspicious” packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee’s idle curiosity.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
* Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
* Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
* The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
* There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
* Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.

Source <v05>
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

------------------------------------
Waiting for KUDOS

If you have any questions
New!
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 148
Location: Toronto
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2010, 11:46
BellTheGmat wrote:
It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open “suspicious” packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee’s idle curiosity.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
* Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
* Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
* The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
* There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
* Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.

For assumption questions, we want to deconstruct the argument: paraphrase the conclusion and evidence. Once we have done so, we then identify the missing link between the two.

In this case, the author concludes that it's a mistake to allow postal workers discretion regarding inspecting packages. Why? Because (so here comes the evidence...) curiousity and boredom will lead to all packages being opened.

What does the author have to be assuming to reach his conclusion based on his evidence? That postal workers do, in fact, want to know what's inside the packages.

So, armed with that prediction, we attack the choices looking for a match.

A) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
B) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
C) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
D) nothing about motivation to open packages - eliminate.
E) aha! Here's exactly what we predicted, we know (E) is correct.

Kaplan's denial test can be a very useful tool for assumption questions. If we weren't already convinced that (E) is correct, we'd consider the opposite of (E):

Quote:
Postal workers do not desire to open packages out of curiousity.

Well, if postal workers aren't curious, the author's argument makes no sense at all. Since the denial of (E) destroys the argument, (E) must be an essential element, the exact definition of an assumption.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: It is a mistake to give post office employees individual [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2015, 04:56
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2206
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 140

Re: It is a mistake to give post office employees individual [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Mar 2016, 20:10
BellTheGmat wrote:
It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open “suspicious” packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee’s idle curiosity.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
* Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
* Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
* The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
* There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
* Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.

Source <v05>

bu the % of each answer choice, I see I am not the only one who was thinking between B and E.
A - irrelevant.
B - even if they are distinguishable, it does not mean that the postal employees would not open other packages out of curiosity.
C - efficiency of postal service is out of scope
D - even if there was such a protocol, employees would still open the packages out of curiosity.
E - if we negate this one, the conclusion does not stand anymore. so E it is.
Re: It is a mistake to give post office employees individual   [#permalink] 18 Mar 2016, 20:10
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 It is a mistake to give post office employees individual 13 12 Aug 2013, 13:38
18 It is a mistake to give post office employees individual 21 20 Nov 2010, 06:22
17 Brownlea s post office must be replaced with a larger one. 27 13 May 2010, 10:03
The less frequently employees leave the office for a 5 20 Jan 2010, 23:42
2 Brownlea s post office must be replaced with a larger one. 14 19 Apr 2009, 07:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by