B)...i would attack it like this. the pattern in the arg goes like this: since everyone and no one => none.
A) since everyone and everyone = no one => wrong pattern
B) since no one and since all = none => wrong pattern
C) since not and since everyone = no one => first fact refers to an object => wrong
D) everyone and no one = no one
E) since all = no one => wrong pattern
its b/w B) and D). i decide for B), because in the arg as well as in B) "all/everyone" follows the conclusion. in D) "no one" follows the conclusion.
If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.