Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Nov 2014, 20:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2007, 20:26
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.

Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?

(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate.

Totally lost on this one :roll:
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1560
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 165 [1] , given: 1

Re: CR1000 - logical error [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2007, 10:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
kripalkavi wrote:
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.

Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?

(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate.

Totally lost on this one :roll:


The argument needs an answer which has 2 different effects attributed to 1 cause. Of all the answer choices, only A meets this criteria.

Choice A

Cause - Anonymous donor
Effect 1 - Donation to historical society
Effect 2 - Volunteers at children's hospital

The only fact we know is that the anonymous donor donated to the historical society. The inference that the donor also volunteers at the children's hospital is illogical.

Choice B is intriguing. Here Cause A effects B and B effects C. The statement implies that Cause A effects C by causing effect B. This reasoning is logical.

I will go with A.
_________________

My Profile/GMAT/MBA Story
http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/111-t59345

Take a Survey about GMAT Prep - Win Prizes!

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 754
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2007, 22:35
A !

smells like LSAT question
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1443
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 12

 [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2007, 23:21
definitely a hard one, but I will go with A as well, 2nd statement has no bearing on the cause and effect as the first statement already "serves entirely to describe the cause"
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2007, 01:56
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
A !

smells like LSAT question


You smelt right. OA is A. Understood

- One cause (donor) leads to an effect ($1000 to society). Inferring another effect (volunteer at children's hospital) from the same cause (donor) is illogical.

Thanks prasad!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: CR1000 - logical error [#permalink] New post 16 Jan 2008, 03:28
A it is
Re: CR1000 - logical error   [#permalink] 16 Jan 2008, 03:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from IEsailor 16 17 Oct 2009, 08:50
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from tenaman10 11 17 Jun 2009, 22:21
2 It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from neelabhmahesh 2 29 Jan 2008, 00:24
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from hellom3p 12 07 Mar 2006, 09:30
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from Vithal 9 20 Mar 2005, 17:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.