Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 04:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 307
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2009, 22:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (03:45) correct 50% (02:02) wrong based on 96 sessions
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.
Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?
(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate
_________________

"CEO in making"

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 374
Location: India
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 18 Jun 2009, 12:14
Only A goes on the same line.

rest all related outcome of first to the input of second and thus this forms a chain of events. Only A makes unwarranted assumption.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2009, 03:21
IMO E...
really tricky/toughy..

It took me too long to evaluate.

My Explanation:
Error in passage: One cause => one effect and can't be defined by other effects

Same error in (E)
Heat(cause)=> defined by effect(evaporation)
In last the conclusion heat can cause only evaporation(one effect) and nothing else(no other effects)

Please correct me if needed!
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 04 May 2010, 14:02
sudeep wrote:
IMO E...
really tricky/toughy..

It took me too long to evaluate.

My Explanation:
Error in passage: One cause => one effect and can't be defined by other effects

Same error in (E)
Heat(cause)=> defined by effect(evaporation)
In last the conclusion heat can cause only evaporation(one effect) and nothing else(no other effects)

Please correct me if needed!


That is not correct. Any more takers??
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 298
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 04 May 2010, 14:23
IMO Only B and E are contenders..
But still not clear with the final answer..!!
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1561
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 211 [0], given: 6

Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 05 May 2010, 08:59
i narrowed it to B and D.

picked (D)

what is the OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 196
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 05 May 2010, 09:17
I think ans is A

Cause: charitable
Effect: donation
Just because a peron donates in X also means he would donate in Y
assumption that it is CHARITABLE nature that prompts someone to donate and no other characteristic of a person.
However,if the person donates in X for one reason that reason might not apply for Y
and hence such an argument is wrong.
Very similar to the arg in stimulus where it assumes that only one characteristic of
an cause wholly makes up the effect.This assumption is wrong
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2793
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 178

Kudos [?]: 949 [0], given: 235

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 11 May 2010, 16:22
Please elaborate again.

I m not able to understand the stimulus.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

Re: LSAT - Parallel Structure [#permalink] New post 12 May 2010, 03:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO B
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 622 [1] , given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2012, 22:10
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
IMO A.
my take:
The line of reasoning in stem is that X causes Y. Therefore X must also cause Z.
This is almost similar to the reasoning in A.
Hope that helps.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 409
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 60 [2] , given: 82

Re: It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2012, 01:36
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO B...can any one explain

OA??

tenaman10 wrote:
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.
Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?
(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate

_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1228
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 684 [1] , given: 116

Premium Member
Re: It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2012, 05:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
Cause gives effect.
Hence cause can give another effect.

a) Good guy gives to charity.
Hence good guy must also volunteer.

Answer is A
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Re: It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2012, 05:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from vaivish1723 4 25 Jan 2010, 09:19
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from IEsailor 16 17 Oct 2009, 08:50
2 It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from neelabhmahesh 2 29 Jan 2008, 00:24
1 It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from kripalkavi 5 28 Jan 2007, 20:26
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from Vithal 9 20 Mar 2005, 17:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.