Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 15:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [1] , given: 1

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2010, 09:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

24% (03:02) correct 76% (02:18) wrong based on 22 sessions
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.
Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?
(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate.


OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
a
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 149

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT Test IV.....pl help [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2011, 06:52
Guys I chose A which is correct because the second effect ,Volunteering at the children's hospital' is being inferred from the First effect ,which is the Donation of thousand dollars to our historical society.

_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT Test IV.....pl help [#permalink] New post 04 May 2011, 03:37
wow you are an intelligent sardar ji then. btw @ vaivish this is a good question particularly under time constraints

_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1365
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT Test IV.....pl help [#permalink] New post 05 May 2011, 01:36
Statement structure - cause known by effect1
cause different characteristic effect2

a donor gives money to a historical society effect 1
donor volunteers hospital effect 2 completely different.

b and c just don't fit it.

d gov 1 funds orchestra effect 1
gov1 civic minded than gov2 comparison instead of effect 2. POE

e water heat evaporates effect 1
other liquid heat evaporates effect 2 effects are same. POE.

A survives.

_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: ThinkTank
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: LSAT Test IV.....pl help [#permalink] New post 05 May 2011, 07:31
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.

Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?

(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate.

-----

In essence, the argument says we can not infer w from x because the w could be just a different characteristic of x and not a second effect. the effect that describes x is y. We need to recognize the cause, first effect and second effect in answer choices and find the choice that shows that the second effect is actually something in the cause.

A) Looks promising: the donor defines the society, and the second inference is different but volunteers is just a feature of the society
B) here there is a causal logic but the birth effect is not a characteristic of the material
C) No second and different effect
D) No inference that entirely defines the cause
E) There is no other inference or second effect

I would go with A

_________________

http://www.hannibalprep.com

Re: LSAT Test IV.....pl help   [#permalink] 05 May 2011, 07:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from IEsailor 16 17 Oct 2009, 08:50
2 It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from neelabhmahesh 2 29 Jan 2008, 00:24
1 It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from kripalkavi 5 28 Jan 2007, 20:26
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from hellom3p 12 07 Mar 2006, 09:30
It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from Geethu 7 11 Aug 2004, 10:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.