It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 23:07

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 1

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2010, 04:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:22) correct 43% (01:48) wrong based on 91 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
why answer is not A
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4219
Followers: 325

Kudos [?]: 3442 [0], given: 100

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2010, 06:20
summary of the passage..
it tells us that one condition,T, is not the reason for a coys failure as other coys too have same condition , so P must be the reason...
but what is the difference in the wordings in two cases.... in zanco, it is attributed to the publicity of that cond..... but nothing is said abt T in the other set of factories... it may well be possible that people are not aware of that cond existing..... therefore the argument must be assuming that people are aware in other case of factories and this is what CHOICE B states...
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 60
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 2

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2010, 06:26
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
navdeepbajwa wrote:
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

The conclusion is "After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products. ".

(B) directly addresses the conclusion. The basis of the conclusion is that other companies have factories with poor working conditions and their sales aren't affected - this assumes that people know that the other companies have factories with poor working conditions; that they are aware of those conditions.
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 73
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 15

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2010, 10:22
statement A is restating the argument : ppl do not let lose morality of companies affect their choice

the question is about the assumption behind the argument. so you should look for answer that explain why it seems as if ppl do not factor morality of companies into their choices.
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 144
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2010, 15:22
I think ans B is makes a appropriate assumption that people know about the bad working conditions of the other companies as they do of Zanco's
Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jan 2010, 05:41
Please explain why A is wrong and not that B is right
thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 362
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 375 [0], given: 47

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jan 2010, 03:30
navdeepbajwa wrote:
Please explain why A is wrong and not that B is right
thanks

Answer is B....

CN = After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products

A is not correct as it states:
People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.

People would only decide to buy the production based on their moral consideration if they are aware of the working conditions. If they are not even aware of the working conditions, this statement is anyway not relevant. Morever this statement is a exaggerated as it account for all people stating that they don't consider their morality for purchasing the good. This statement falls in the extreme bucket!

Option B: gives you the simple reason stating that the people are aware of the conditions of the similar factories where working conditions of the people in those factories. This is the correct assumption.

In case you have read the Powerscore CR Bible, it teaches an incredible technique for you to tackle Assumption questions (Negative Test). If you use that technique, Option B stands the perfect answer! Thats just a double check for me
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|

~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 175
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [1] , given: 5

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jan 2010, 07:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
t is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

B is the clear winner

in the passage the justification is people buy from companies which uses supplies from factories which are as bad as zanco's suppliers

This justification will be a valid one only people are aware of the bad working conditions of the other factory suppliers

A can be true but it has nothing to do with the justification provided so this argument is not based on that particular assumption so it is not the correct answer choice
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 6

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jan 2010, 11:29
navdeepbajwa wrote:
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.the tone of this statement is extreme, few people may be likely to let moral considerations affect the products they purchase
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.this is the right answer. the stimulus aptly assumes that people are aware of the inhuman working conditions
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

why answer is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B
not
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

clearly C,D & E are wrong.
between A and B, B seems to be right because of the above mentioned reasons.
_________________

Deserve before you Desire

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 144
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jan 2010, 15:57
Ans B correctly makes assumption that people are aware of the working condition of the other factories as they are of Zanco. This is essential to make a comparison and draw a conclusion
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 10

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2011, 05:51
got tricked here.Between B and E,went for E instead.

However, the conclusion mentions a clear judgement call between quality and moral grounds. E touches just one aspect.
B touches both aspect and negating B clearly crashes the reasoning mentioned in the premise,the comparison.Hence the conclusion.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 2

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Sep 2015, 07:46
shanewyatt wrote:
navdeepbajwa wrote:
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

The conclusion is "After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products. ".

(B) directly addresses the conclusion. The basis of the conclusion is that other companies have factories with poor working conditions and their sales aren't affected - this assumes that people know that the other companies have factories with poor working conditions; that they are aware of those conditions.

The conclusion is, as i see it, "It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts". That's the opinion. Any other thing is just scope shift.
To answer assumption questions, what could possibly be the reason why the PUBLICITY itself has failed? If you get this right, the answer comes clear.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 107
GPA: 3.84
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 151

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Oct 2016, 01:53
can anyone help me with option D and E?
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Fuqua Thread Master
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 759
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 64

Re: It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Oct 2016, 02:37
chetan2u Can you please throw light on option E
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2315
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 352

Kudos [?]: 1466 [0], given: 20

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2017, 11:01
Keats wrote:
chetan2u Can you please throw light on option E

Option E:
An assumption should link the premise to the conclusion:
Premise: Plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.
Conclusion: Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds

Negate option E: The poor quality of Zanco's products is a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured. The argument that the failure of Zanco is not because of moral reasons but because of poor products is not affected by this statement. (the argument should have been broken by negating the option, if option E were an assumption).

Hence E is not the correct option.

sananoor wrote:
can anyone help me with option D and E?

Option D:
Option D could be a strengthening statement, but it is not a mandatory assumption.
Negate option D: Zanco's sales dipped sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
This option strengthens weakens the argument, but it does not break down the argument. It is still possible that the dip was caused by some other factor, not because of moral reasons.
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2017, 11:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 The attribution of the choral work Lacrime to the composer 9 29 Jan 2013, 11:45
2 Logically completes-the attribution of the choral .. 6 03 Oct 2012, 18:32
8 The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer 7 22 Jul 2009, 08:06
Investigators concluded that human failure was not 9 17 Jul 2007, 11:50
Investigators concluded that human failure was not 1 22 May 2007, 08:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.