Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 19:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 1

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2010, 04:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

47% (02:27) correct 53% (01:31) wrong based on 18 sessions
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

why answer is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B
not
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 269
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 1

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2010, 06:20
summary of the passage..
it tells us that one condition,T, is not the reason for a coys failure as other coys too have same condition , so P must be the reason...
but what is the difference in the wordings in two cases.... in zanco, it is attributed to the publicity of that cond..... but nothing is said abt T in the other set of factories... it may well be possible that people are not aware of that cond existing..... therefore the argument must be assuming that people are aware in other case of factories and this is what CHOICE B states...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 2

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2010, 06:26
navdeepbajwa wrote:
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.


The conclusion is "After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products. ".

(B) directly addresses the conclusion. The basis of the conclusion is that other companies have factories with poor working conditions and their sales aren't affected - this assumes that people know that the other companies have factories with poor working conditions; that they are aware of those conditions.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 73
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 15

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2010, 10:22
statement A is restating the argument : ppl do not let lose morality of companies affect their choice

the question is about the assumption behind the argument. so you should look for answer that explain why it seems as if ppl do not factor morality of companies into their choices.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2010, 15:22
I think ans B is makes a appropriate assumption that people know about the bad working conditions of the other companies as they do of Zanco's
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2010, 05:41
Please explain why A is wrong and not that B is right
thanks
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 364
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: tough [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2010, 03:30
navdeepbajwa wrote:
Please explain why A is wrong and not that B is right
thanks


Answer is B....

CN = After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products

A is not correct as it states:
People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.

People would only decide to buy the production based on their moral consideration if they are aware of the working conditions. If they are not even aware of the working conditions, this statement is anyway not relevant. Morever this statement is a exaggerated as it account for all people stating that they don't consider their morality for purchasing the good. This statement falls in the extreme bucket!

Option B: gives you the simple reason stating that the people are aware of the conditions of the similar factories where working conditions of the people in those factories. This is the correct assumption.

In case you have read the Powerscore CR Bible, it teaches an incredible technique for you to tackle Assumption questions (Negative Test). If you use that technique, Option B stands the perfect answer! Thats just a double check for me :)
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 178
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 53 [1] , given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: tough [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2010, 07:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
t is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

B is the clear winner

in the passage the justification is people buy from companies which uses supplies from factories which are as bad as zanco's suppliers

This justification will be a valid one only people are aware of the bad working conditions of the other factory suppliers

A can be true but it has nothing to do with the justification provided so this argument is not based on that particular assumption so it is not the correct answer choice
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 11:29
navdeepbajwa wrote:
It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions~in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts. Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds (conclusion). After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.the tone of this statement is extreme, few people may be likely to let moral considerations affect the products they purchase
(B) People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.this is the right answer. the stimulus aptly assumes that people are aware of the inhuman working conditions
(C) The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D) Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E) The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.

why answer is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B
not
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


clearly C,D & E are wrong.
between A and B, B seems to be right because of the above mentioned reasons.
_________________

Deserve before you Desire

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2010, 15:57
Ans B correctly makes assumption that people are aware of the working condition of the other factories as they are of Zanco. This is essential to make a comparison and draw a conclusion
VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1364
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 10

Re: tough [#permalink] New post 15 May 2011, 05:51
got tricked here.Between B and E,went for E instead.

However, the conclusion mentions a clear judgement call between quality and moral grounds. E touches just one aspect.
B touches both aspect and negating B clearly crashes the reasoning mentioned in the premise,the comparison.Hence the conclusion.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Re: tough   [#permalink] 15 May 2011, 05:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 COMMON IDIOMS often mistaken m2l2 2 20 May 2011, 05:32
Casual Reasoning - Mistaken Reversal/Negation ykaiim 1 20 May 2010, 00:52
attributed to be by/attributed to lgon 5 19 Nov 2008, 22:38
1 Failure Essays - Which failure?? cpgmba 12 12 Aug 2008, 17:55
B-Failure! smudge 15 28 Mar 2007, 19:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure; to the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.