Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 14:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2004, 20:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two or three hundred years ago, especially one without a signature or with a questionably authentic signature, is indubitably the work of this or that particular artist. This fact gives the traditional attribution of a disputed painting special weight, since that attribution carries the presumption of historical continuity. Consequently, an art historian arguing for a deattribution will generally convince other art historians only if he or she can persuasively argue for a specific reattribution.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the position that the traditional attribution of a disputed painting should not have special weight?

(A) Art dealers have always been led by economic self-interest to attribute any unsigned paintings of merit to recognized masters rather than to obscure artists.
(B) When a painting is originally created, there are invariably at least some eyewitnesses who see the artist at work, and thus questions of correct attribution cannot arise at that time.
(C) There are not always clearly discernible differences between the occasional inferior work produced by a master and the very best work produced by a lesser talent.
(D) Attribution can shape perception inasmuch as certain features that would count as marks of greatness in a master’s work would be counted as signs of inferior artistry if a work were attributed to a minor artist.
(E) Even though some masters had specialists assist them with certain detail work, such as depicting lace, the resulting works are properly attributed to the masters alone.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Location: Missouri, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2004, 23:20
Ill go with C. :?
_________________

Let's get it right!!!!

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Dec 2004, 00:47
Gosh. This is tough. C is close, but inclined to chose A. The quandry would be that a good art (but not painted by a well known artist) is signed as one from a well known artist. This will carry special weight - or increase its value. So, if there is no special weight attached, then this painting does not get its undue value. If this thing comes in the real test, I will run for cover.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Dec 2004, 06:26
I will go with ‘D’
A – The passage does not specify that the attribution is done by Art dealers. Attribution can be done by anybody – an art collector, another painter etc.
B – Out of context
C – This mentions only about 2 categories of artists – one who is a master at his work and the other who is not so but what about artists who fall under the midstream category.
E – Out of context
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 697
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Dec 2004, 06:51
I pick D.

This question was time consuming :-(
What is the source of this question??
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2004, 00:05
OA is A......
  [#permalink] 11 Dec 2004, 00:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two x97agarwal 3 24 Jul 2008, 19:06
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two vksunder 2 24 Jul 2008, 14:55
1 It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two mymba99 7 16 Apr 2008, 10:56
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two vineetgupta 13 11 Mar 2007, 03:53
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two WinWinMBA 5 26 May 2005, 11:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.