It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 20:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2004, 20:01
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two or three hundred years ago, especially one without a signature or with a questionably authentic signature, is indubitably the work of this or that particular artist. This fact gives the traditional attribution of a disputed painting special weight, since that attribution carries the presumption of historical continuity. Consequently, an art historian arguing for a deattribution will generally convince other art historians only if he or she can persuasively argue for a specific reattribution.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the position that the traditional attribution of a disputed painting should not have special weight?

(A) Art dealers have always been led by economic self-interest to attribute any unsigned paintings of merit to recognized masters rather than to obscure artists.
(B) When a painting is originally created, there are invariably at least some eyewitnesses who see the artist at work, and thus questions of correct attribution cannot arise at that time.
(C) There are not always clearly discernible differences between the occasional inferior work produced by a master and the very best work produced by a lesser talent.
(D) Attribution can shape perception inasmuch as certain features that would count as marks of greatness in a masterâ€™s work would be counted as signs of inferior artistry if a work were attributed to a minor artist.
(E) Even though some masters had specialists assist them with certain detail work, such as depicting lace, the resulting works are properly attributed to the masters alone.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 317
Location: Missouri, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2004, 23:20
Ill go with C.
_________________

Let's get it right!!!!

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2004, 00:47
Gosh. This is tough. C is close, but inclined to chose A. The quandry would be that a good art (but not painted by a well known artist) is signed as one from a well known artist. This will carry special weight - or increase its value. So, if there is no special weight attached, then this painting does not get its undue value. If this thing comes in the real test, I will run for cover.
Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 865
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2004, 06:26
I will go with â€˜Dâ€™
A â€“ The passage does not specify that the attribution is done by Art dealers. Attribution can be done by anybody â€“ an art collector, another painter etc.
B â€“ Out of context
C â€“ This mentions only about 2 categories of artists â€“ one who is a master at his work and the other who is not so but what about artists who fall under the midstream category.
E â€“ Out of context
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 689
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2004, 06:51
I pick D.

This question was time consuming
What is the source of this question??
Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2004, 00:05
OA is A......
11 Dec 2004, 00:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two 9 01 Jul 2009, 01:19
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two 3 24 Jul 2008, 19:06
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two 2 24 Jul 2008, 14:55
1 It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two 7 16 Apr 2008, 10:56
It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two 13 11 Mar 2007, 03:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.