Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Oct 2010, 09:49

5

This post received KUDOS

23

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (03:25) correct
44% (02:48) wrong based on 615 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours, how long will it take Jack to type 40 pages?

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours, how long will it take Jack to type 40 pages?

5 6 8 10 12

Can anyone explain the method to work with such problems ? Cause I always get them wrong ! And if you know any similar questions, please share. Thanks

Let the time needed for Jack to type 20 pages by \(j\) hours, then for Tom it would be \(j-2\) hours. So the rate of Jack is \(rate=\frac{job}{time}=\frac{20}{j}\) pages per hour and the rate of Tom \(rate=\frac{job}{time}=\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour.

Their combined rate would be \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour and this equal to \(\frac{25}{3}\) pages per hour --> \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}=\frac{25}{3}\) --> \(\frac{60}{j}+\frac{60}{j-2}=25\). At this point we can either try to substitute the values from the answer choices or solve quadratic equation. Remember as we are asked to find time needed for Jack to type \(40\) pages, then the answer would be \(2j\) (as \(j\) is the time needed to type \(20\) pages). Answer E works: \(2j=12\) --> \(j=6\) --> \(\frac{60}{6}+\frac{60}{6-2}=10+15=25\).

Bunuel, I noticed that many sample questions work-rate-questions-i-collected-from-gmat-club-73382.html result in quadratic equations at some stages. As a rule of thumb, once we faced with a quadratic expression, shall we try answer choices? Maybe I am too slow, but it takes more than 2 min to solve a quadratic expression IN THESE PARTICULAR RATE PROBLEMS.

Took ages to complete because of the quadratic equation. Back solving using the options given, IMO, should be a lot faster. Thanks Bunuel. Answer: E _________________

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours, how long will it take Jack to type 40 pages?

5 6 8 10 12

Can anyone explain the method to work with such problems ? Cause I always get them wrong ! And if you know any similar questions, please share. Thanks

You can solve equations like the one given below using some logic. Even if you do not have options, you can still get your answer very easily. You don't really need to make a quadratic.

Look at the right hand side of the equation. The fraction is in the lowest form. So you looking for a 3 somewhere in the denominator. Also note that 25/3 is a little more than 8. Can 't' be 3? No, because 20/3 + 20/5 is a little more than 10. Can 't+2' be 3? No, because then t = 1 and the sum on the left hand side will be more than 20. Can 't+2' be 6 instead? 20/4 + 20/6 = 25/3 So t must be 4 and t+2 must be 6.
_________________

Let the time needed for Jack to type 20 pages by \(j\) hours, then for Tom it would be \(j-2\) hours. So the rate of Jack is \(rate=\frac{job}{time}=\frac{20}{j}\) pages per hour and the rate of Tom \(rate=\frac{job}{time}=\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour.

Their combined rate would be \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour and this equal to \(\frac{25}{3}\) pages per hour --> \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}=\frac{25}{3}\) --> \(\frac{60}{j}+\frac{60}{j-2}=25\). At this point we can either try to substitute the values from the answer choices or solve quadratic equation. Remember as we are asked to find time needed for Jack to type \(40\) pages, then the answer would be \(2j\) (as \(j\) is the time needed to type \(20\) pages). Answer E works: \(2j=12\) --> \(j=6\) --> \(\frac{60}{6}+\frac{60}{6-2}=10+15=25\).

Bunuel, can you explain how below is possible? Combined 20 pg and equaled to 25 pg?

Their combined rate would be \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour and this equal to \(\frac{25}{3}\) pages per hour --> \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}=\frac{25}{3}\)

Let the time needed for Jack to type 20 pages by \(j\) hours, then for Tom it would be \(j-2\) hours. So the rate of Jack is \(rate=\frac{job}{time}=\frac{20}{j}\) pages per hour and the rate of Tom \(rate=\frac{job}{time}=\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour.

Their combined rate would be \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour and this equal to \(\frac{25}{3}\) pages per hour --> \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}=\frac{25}{3}\) --> \(\frac{60}{j}+\frac{60}{j-2}=25\). At this point we can either try to substitute the values from the answer choices or solve quadratic equation. Remember as we are asked to find time needed for Jack to type \(40\) pages, then the answer would be \(2j\) (as \(j\) is the time needed to type \(20\) pages). Answer E works: \(2j=12\) --> \(j=6\) --> \(\frac{60}{6}+\frac{60}{6-2}=10+15=25\).

Bunuel, can you explain how below is possible? Combined 20 pg and equaled to 25 pg?

Their combined rate would be \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}\) pages per hour and this equal to \(\frac{25}{3}\) pages per hour --> \(\frac{20}{j}+\frac{20}{j-2}=\frac{25}{3}\)

We are told that "working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours", thus their combined rate is 25/3 pages per hour.

We also know that Jack's rate is 20/j pages per hour and Tom's rate is 20/(j-2) pages per hour, thus their combined rate is 20/j+20/(j-2) pages per hour.

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2013, 11:44

I was not able to solve the quadratic; 20/j + 20/j+2 = 25/3 I ended up simplifying it to 5x^2 - 14x - 24 = 0 ; I got the value of x as 4 mins and for 40 copies as 8 mins.... can anyone help me , where did i go wrong??????????

I was not able to solve the quadratic; 20/j + 20/j+2 = 25/3 I ended up simplifying it to 5x^2 - 14x - 24 = 0 ; I got the value of x as 4 mins and for 40 copies as 8 mins.... can anyone help me , where did i go wrong??????????

You did everything right except the last part of assigning the right variable to the right person.

The quadratic you got was 20/j + 20/j+2 = 25/3 Since Jack takes 2 more hrs than Tom, 20/j is the rate of Tom and 20/(j+2) is the rate of Jack.

You got j = 4 So j+2 = 6 = Time taken by Jack to type 20 pages

So time taken by Jack to type 20 pages = 2*6 = 12

When assigning variables, its always advisable to assign x to the value you need to find i.e. j should have been the time taken by Jack since you need to find Jack's time. Not that it changes the question in any way but you avoid this particular error you committed here. Also, in that case, it is easier to plug in values from the answer choices and you don't really need to solve the quadratic.
_________________

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Mar 2013, 01:27

Barkatis wrote:

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours, how long will it take Jack to type 40 pages?

A. 5 B. 6 C. 8 D. 10 E. 12

Got stuck in the quadratic. However when i looked a little closely at the question I realized I could work by employing logic. Since the combined rate of work is 25 pages in 3 hours it implies their combined rate is just marginally greater than 8 pages per hour. The question requires us to determine how long Jack takes working alone to type 40 pages. Now since their combined rate is 8 pages an hour working together they would finish 40 pages in about 5 hours. We also know that Jack's rate is slower than Tom's. So if Jack works alone he must take more than double the time it would have taken had they worked together. i.e little more than 10. Only E suffices.

P.S. Could anyone let me know if we should follow this approach of using Logic to arrive at the answer if the Work Rate problems become convoluted??(Like involving massive quadratics)

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours, how long will it take Jack to type 40 pages?

A. 5 B. 6 C. 8 D. 10 E. 12

Got stuck in the quadratic. However when i looked a little closely at the question I realized I could work by employing logic. Since the combined rate of work is 25 pages in 3 hours it implies their combined rate is just marginally greater than 8 pages per hour. The question requires us to determine how long Jack takes working alone to type 40 pages. Now since their combined rate is 8 pages an hour working together they would finish 40 pages in about 5 hours. We also know that Jack's rate is slower than Tom's. So if Jack works alone he must take more than double the time it would have taken had they worked together. i.e little more than 10. Only E suffices.

P.S. Could anyone let me know if we should follow this approach of using Logic to arrive at the answer if the Work Rate problems become convoluted??(Like involving massive quadratics)

Yes, your approach is absolutely fine. If nothing is working out, you can certainly take a very good guess in this way (here the options are such that you would have no doubt that (E) is the correct answer). We just run the risk of more than 1 options satisfying the constraints we come up with at the end. Say, an option gave you 11.6, then we would have wasted time. We cannot use approximation in that case. Therefore, you also need to learn to work on equations where the variable is in the denominator. You don't necessarily have to make a quadratic in that case. You can plug in the options as I have discussed in my post above: it-takes-jack-2-more-hours-than-tom-to-type-20-pages-if-102407.html#p1024552.
_________________

t=4/5 cannot be the case since t-2 would be negative then!

t=6 for 20 pages for 40 pages it would be 2t

12
_________________

Rgds, TGC! _____________________________________________________________________ I Assisted You => KUDOS Please _____________________________________________________________________________

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jul 2014, 08:42

1

This post received KUDOS

I need some guidance here.. Although I understand the basic work = rate*time formula but when working on problems such as above it doesn't quite strikes me that what is a good way to solve a problem until I end up going through Bunuel or any other expert's post. :l Such as in this problem, rather than assuming variables for time, i assumed variables for rates and came up with: (j+t)*3 = 25 and 20/j = 20/t + 2 where j and t are respective rate variables for Jack and Tom. And while substituting and solving these equations, I got lost and spent 4 minutes without an answer. But as soon as I went through Bunuel's and Karishma's posts I noticed that assuming variables for what was asked (i.e. time) would have made the solution easier.

My question is how/what should one practice in order to get into the habit of approaching the problem in a simpler way rather than just coming up with long-routes and unnecessary calculations that might not be even needed for getting the answer.

I know this question is quite subjective, but any help will be appreciated.

I need some guidance here.. Although I understand the basic work = rate*time formula but when working on problems such as above it doesn't quite strikes me that what is a good way to solve a problem until I end up going through Bunuel or any other expert's post. :l Such as in this problem, rather than assuming variables for time, i assumed variables for rates and came up with: (j+t)*3 = 25 and 20/j = 20/t + 2 where j and t are respective rate variables for Jack and Tom. And while substituting and solving these equations, I got lost and spent 4 minutes without an answer. But as soon as I went through Bunuel's and Karishma's posts I noticed that assuming variables for what was asked (i.e. time) would have made the solution easier.

My question is how/what should one practice in order to get into the habit of approaching the problem in a simpler way rather than just coming up with long-routes and unnecessary calculations that might not be even needed for getting the answer.

I know this question is quite subjective, but any help will be appreciated.

Thanks much!

Here are a few tips: - Many times, you wont need to take any variables. You can use a logical approach though that takes some work and practice first. - If you do need to take variables, you will usually need to take only one. Let that variable be the one which you need to find. Say, if you need time taken, take the variable T, not rate or work. Very rarely would it be a good idea to take something else as the variable. Also, prefer to work with multiplication and addition rather than division and subtraction i.e. if time take by A is 2 hrs more than time taken by B, assume time taken by B = T and time taken by A = T+2. - Very rarely would you need to take two variables. If you do, find the relation between the two variables as soon as you can and then bring everything down to a single variable.

With practice, you will know how to identify the right approach quickly. Sometimes, everyone gets lost in a circuitous method - important is to move on and not waste too much time on it.
_________________

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Feb 2015, 15:00

I did this question in the gmat club test. Couldn't solve it using the traditional approach then used another approach for this.

We know that combined they typed 25 pages in 3 hrs. Hence combined they will type 40 pages in 3*40/25=24/5~=5 I considered that since together they take 5 hrs then individually J's time would be more than 10 hours as his speed his lower than that of Tom.

I did this question in the gmat club test. Couldn't solve it using the traditional approach then used another approach for this.

We know that combined they typed 25 pages in 3 hrs. Hence combined they will type 40 pages in 3*40/25=24/5~=5 I considered that since together they take 5 hrs then individually J's time would be more than 10 hours as his speed his lower than that of Tom.

The only possible answer is E i.e 12 hrs.

Yes, your approach is very good. The only thing I have an issue with is the approximation used. Their combined time is 4.8 hrs and hence we know that Jack will take more than 9.6 hrs. 10 hrs is a possible candidate for the correct option in that case. Though I would say that if Jack took just a wee bit more than 9.6 hrs, then Tom would have taken a tiny bit less than 9.6 hrs and then the difference in their individual time taken could not be 2 hrs. So yes, (E) must be the answer.
_________________

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Feb 2015, 01:04

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

qw1981 wrote:

I did this question in the gmat club test. Couldn't solve it using the traditional approach then used another approach for this.

We know that combined they typed 25 pages in 3 hrs. Hence combined they will type 40 pages in 3*40/25=24/5~=5 I considered that since together they take 5 hrs then individually J's time would be more than 10 hours as his speed his lower than that of Tom.

The only possible answer is E i.e 12 hrs.

Yes, your approach is very good. The only thing I have an issue with is the approximation used. Their combined time is 4.8 hrs and hence we know that Jack will take more than 9.6 hrs. 10 hrs is a possible candidate for the correct option in that case. Though I would say that if Jack took just a wee bit more than 9.6 hrs, then Tom would have taken a tiny bit less than 9.6 hrs and then the difference in their individual time taken could not be 2 hrs. So yes, (E) must be the answer.

Well i was doing this under time pressure so in the mock exam. So didn't think much about. After wasting some time was about to give up, had an epiphany the approach worked, I marked the answer and moved on

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2015, 22:05

Barkatis wrote:

It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If working together, Jack and Tom can type 25 pages in 3 hours, how long will it take Jack to type 40 pages?

A. 5 B. 6 C. 8 D. 10 E. 12

Hello,

why can't it be time taken by tom= T and time taken by Jack= T+2 ? And then the eq becomes \(\frac{20}{T}\) + \(\frac{20}{T+2}\) = \(\frac{25}{3}\)

Please help?

gmatclubot

Re: It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If
[#permalink]
05 Oct 2015, 22:05

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...