Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 01 Aug 2015, 02:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The

Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 152 [5] , given: 14

It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 05:39
5
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (02:01) correct 41% (01:04) wrong based on 1149 sessions
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

(A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise

(B) It was only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her commandt it had won high praise

(C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command

(D) Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command

(E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 21 Jul 2015, 04:14, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 05:57
Indeed a tough one....but with no error IMO!!!!
i lgo with A...
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 329
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 93 [1] , given: 5

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 06:01
1
KUDOS
A. It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.( Found it a bit wordy)
B. It was only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her commandt it had won high praise
C. Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that
did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command
D. Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became
its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command

E. Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command.

Will go for D
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 14

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 06:58
guyzz plz explain ur answer choices.........
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 14

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 07:14
OA is A
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 07:43
careful inspection of all sentences indicate wrong use of past and present tenses..
only A escapes this blunder..hope it helps.
Manager
Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [2] , given: 3

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 08:10
2
KUDOS
I 'll go with A.

I also wanted to know why the last part of the sentence(watergate scandal) is not there in any other choice, I hope we'll have to include that in the correct answer.
Retired Moderator
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1316
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 65

Kudos [?]: 645 [0], given: 157

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  05 Oct 2009, 19:08
Can any one explain, what's wrong with "E"???
_________________
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  06 Oct 2009, 03:38
Moving and Won cannot be used simulteneously here...pls correct if a im wrong..
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 262
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 113 [7] , given: 3

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 08:52
7
KUDOS
Well guyz the reasons why option A is the best choice are Logical Predication and Parallelism.

Parallelism: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

Moreover, because of the logical predication the sentence reads correctly without unnecessary usage of words such as 'becoming' and 'moving'

Hope the explanation helps!!
Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 16

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 17:44
abhi758 wrote:
Well guyz the reasons why option A is the best choice are Logical Predication and Parallelism.

Parallelism: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

Moreover, because of the logical predication the sentence reads correctly without unnecessary usage of words such as 'becoming' and 'moving'

Hope the explanation helps!!

thx your explanation makes sense. +1

Now I record things like 'sb's moving' are wrong in GMATland.
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 262
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 3

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  10 Oct 2009, 07:31
Glad to help Talinhuu!! Always watch out for the Parallelism and Comparison in SC, majority of the SCs have it and very well disguise it to confuse the exam takers..
Intern
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 13

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  26 Oct 2009, 19:27
My answer was way far off from the right answer, I gussed E. damn! now I know answer is A and the explanation - thanks buddies
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 54
Location: pitt
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  26 Oct 2009, 21:37
nice...one..

I went with D .. but ur explaining was good.
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade WE 1: 3.5 years international Followers: 6 Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 18 Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink] 07 Oct 2010, 05:38 talk2pk wrote: Indeed a tough one....but with no error IMO!!!! i lgo with A... actually it's pretty easy. Answer is ofcorse A. What makes it a very easy and obvious choice, other than grammatical errors, is the fact that none of the other answer choices contain the last part of the second clause-"the paper won praise for it's unrelenting reporting of the watergate scandal". How can that part be simply omitted? It cannot yield to the principle of concision as it distorts the meaning of the sentence. Won praise for what? I agree A is wordy but all other choices are not only grammatically wrong but also omit a necessary part of the second clause of the sentence. Posted from my mobile device Manager Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 225 Location: Boston Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 105 [3] , given: 5 Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink] 07 Oct 2010, 05:45 3 This post received KUDOS I'm guessing that "for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal" is NOT supposed to be underlined in the problem. gurpreet07 wrote: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal. (A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal. Perfect (B) It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her command it had won high praise "only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher" is ungrammatical, and the past perfect "had won high praise" is incorrect here (C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command Very awkward. "Only after that did it move" - "it" needs to refer to the subject, which is Katharine Graham here, but it actually refers to The Washington Post. "Having won high praise" doesn't work logically (D) Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command Sentence fragment (E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command. Again, "Katharine Graham's becoming" is ungrammatical. The introduction clause at the beginning of the sentence is extremely long, making the sentence somewhat clunky. Retired Moderator Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2370 Location: India WE: Education (Education) Followers: 333 Kudos [?]: 2445 [5] , given: 262 Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink] 07 Oct 2010, 07:25 5 This post received KUDOS Expert's post 1 This post was BOOKMARKED Choice A starts with it was and follows up the same with a parallel it was in the second part. It also uses the simple past became to denote an event that occurred in the past. Though wordy, A seems to be without any error. This must be the right choice. B It should be newspapers and not newspaper- may be a typo, let’s us ignore it. Becoming publisher is sought to be used as a gerund here. But the serious error is in the use of past perfect tense it had won. The context entails a simple past tense i.e. won. C 1. The adjectival modifier having won high praise does not seem to have a noun to modify. Does it modify Katherine or Katherine’s publishership or The Washington Post? 2. does the pronoun that stand for Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post. Because that is a pronoun and should refer to a noun rather than a clause. 3. Did it win high praise first for reporting Watergate episode that happened in 1974 and then move into the first rank of American newspapers in 1963 after Katherine became the publisher? Isn’t it incongruous? D is a fragment without a completed verb. Let’s drop it. E Katharine Graham's becoming is a very inelegant way of writing Katherine Graham became; so not acceptable _________________ Manager Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 109 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 54 [3] , given: 12 Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink] 07 Oct 2010, 07:40 3 This post received KUDOS IMO A by POE (A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal. - No issues , looks good (B) It was only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her commandt it had won high praise (C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command (D) Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command - Missing the information of Watergate Scandal and moreover the sentence is awkward (E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command. Same issue as D Please consider giving KUDOS if you like my post Manager Joined: 24 Aug 2010 Posts: 193 Location: Finland Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 74 [1] , given: 18

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  07 Oct 2010, 08:08
1
KUDOS
TehJay wrote:
I'm guessing that "for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal" is NOT supposed to be underlined in the problem.

gurpreet07 wrote:
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

(A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal. Perfect
(B) It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her command it had won high praise "only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher" is ungrammatical, and the past perfect "had won high praise" is incorrect here
(C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command Very awkward. "Only after that did it move" - "it" needs to refer to the subject, which is Katharine Graham here, but it actually refers to The Washington Post. "Having won high praise" doesn't work logically
(D) Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command Sentence fragment
(E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command. Again, "Katharine Graham's becoming" is ungrammatical. The introduction clause at the beginning of the sentence is extremely long, making the sentence somewhat clunky.

Thats what I also thought initially, but when you look at answer choice A, it contains the whole sentence. If the whole sentence is underlined then this question becomes pretty easy, otherwise one can use the principle of parallelism to establish it as a correct answer
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2010
Posts: 225
Location: Boston
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 105 [1] , given: 5

Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The [#permalink]  07 Oct 2010, 09:05
1
KUDOS
shekharvineet wrote:
TehJay wrote:
I'm guessing that "for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal" is NOT supposed to be underlined in the problem.

gurpreet07 wrote:
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

(A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal. Perfect
(B) It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her command it had won high praise "only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher" is ungrammatical, and the past perfect "had won high praise" is incorrect here
(C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command Very awkward. "Only after that did it move" - "it" needs to refer to the subject, which is Katharine Graham here, but it actually refers to The Washington Post. "Having won high praise" doesn't work logically
(D) Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command Sentence fragment
(E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command. Again, "Katharine Graham's becoming" is ungrammatical. The introduction clause at the beginning of the sentence is extremely long, making the sentence somewhat clunky.

Thats what I also thought initially, but when you look at answer choice A, it contains the whole sentence. If the whole sentence is underlined then this question becomes pretty easy, otherwise one can use the principle of parallelism to establish it as a correct answer

I assumed the TC just copied/pasted and didn't realize their mistake.
Re: It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2010, 09:05

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 55 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The 8 13 Oct 2008, 05:52
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The 19 16 May 2008, 22:49
5 It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The 10 28 Mar 2008, 09:26
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of the 3 08 Dec 2007, 02:13
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The 2 25 Mar 2006, 12:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by