Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

i took a looong time to solve this ....the source is unknown ...it was posted on one of the forums and i noted htis in my notes .....now revising my notes and going through them i found it again

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

Another way is to perhaps apply ratio & proportion.

99.75 is proportional to 4.75, hence what is proportional to 5? We get 9975*5/475 = 9975/95 = 105 Now at 105 Jane and Karen will be neck to neck and the talks about Jane overtaking Karen. Hence according to me the answer must be > 105 - 100. Hence my answer is greater than 5.

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

We are asked: In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen? So I think we are asked to calculate the distance Jane should cover to overtake Karen but all solutions above are calculating the distance Karen should cover. Can you please post answer choices to clear my doubts.

Anyway below is my solution:

Jane covered \(100m-0.25m=99.75m\) and Karen covered \(100-5=95m\) (in the same time interval).

Initial distance between them was \(5m\) and final distance between Jane and Karen was \(0.25m\). Thus Jane gained \(99.75m-95m=4.75m\) over Karen in \(99.75m\), hence Jane is gaining \(1m\) over Karen in every \(\frac{99.75}{4.75}=21m\).

Hence, Jane in order to gain remaining \(0.25m\) over Karen should cover \(21*0.25=5.25m\).

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

We are asked: In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen? So I think we are asked to calculate the distance Jane should cover to overtake Karen but all solutions above are calculating the distance Karen should cover.

I think you are right. I interpreted it this way- We now have a 100 meter track. How many more meters should the track have been if Jane were to overtake Karen; hence my answer-greater than 5

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

We are asked: In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen? So I think we are asked to calculate the distance Jane should cover to overtake Karen but all solutions above are calculating the distance Karen should cover. Can you please post answer choices to clear my doubts.

Anyway below is my solution:

Jane covered \(100m-0.25m=99.75m\) and Karen covered \(100-5=95m\) (in the same time interval).

Initial distance between them was \(5m\) and final distance between Jane and Karen was \(0.25m\). Thus Jane gained \(99.75m-95m=4.75m\) over Karen in \(99.75m\), hence Jane is gaining \(1m\) over Karen in every \(\frac{99.75}{4.75}=21m\).

Hence, Jane in order to gain remaining \(0.25m\) over Karen should cover \(21*0.25=5.25m\).

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

We are asked: In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen? So I think we are asked to calculate the distance Jane should cover to overtake Karen but all solutions above are calculating the distance Karen should cover. Can you please post answer choices to clear my doubts.

Anyway below is my solution:

Jane covered \(100m-0.25m=99.75m\) and Karen covered \(100-5=95m\) (in the same time interval).

Initial distance between them was \(5m\) and final distance between Jane and Karen was \(0.25m\). Thus Jane gained \(99.75m-95m=4.75m\) over Karen in \(99.75m\), hence Jane is gaining \(1m\) over Karen in every \(\frac{99.75}{4.75}=21m\).

Hence, Jane in order to gain remaining \(0.25m\) over Karen should cover \(21*0.25=5.25m\).

Answer: 5.25.

Excellent explanation!!! Much simpler than all the others i've read.

Thanks Bunuel _________________

Consider giving Kudos if you liked my post. Thanks!

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

We are asked: In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen? So I think we are asked to calculate the distance Jane should cover to overtake Karen but all solutions above are calculating the distance Karen should cover. Can you please post answer choices to clear my doubts.

Anyway below is my solution:

Jane covered \(100m-0.25m=99.75m\) and Karen covered \(100-5=95m\) (in the same time interval).

Initial distance between them was \(5m\) and final distance between Jane and Karen was \(0.25m\). Thus Jane gained \(99.75m-95m=4.75m\) over Karen in \(99.75m\), hence Jane is gaining \(1m\) over Karen in every \(\frac{99.75}{4.75}=21m\).

Hence, Jane in order to gain remaining \(0.25m\) over Karen should cover \(21*0.25=5.25m\).

Answer: 5.25.

Excellent explanation!!! Much simpler than all the others i've read.

Thanks Bunuel

Karishma's explanation is actually the same, just a little bit more grafical and therefore easier to visualize.

This is a very good explanation but I feel that the questions wording is very ambiguous. I had trouble rationalizing that Jane and Karen traveled their respective distances in the same time!

Bunuel wrote:

neoreaves wrote:

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

We are asked: In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen? So I think we are asked to calculate the distance Jane should cover to overtake Karen but all solutions above are calculating the distance Karen should cover. Can you please post answer choices to clear my doubts.

Anyway below is my solution:

Jane covered \(100m-0.25m=99.75m\) and Karen covered \(100-5=95m\) (in the same time interval).

Initial distance between them was \(5m\) and final distance between Jane and Karen was \(0.25m\). Thus Jane gained \(99.75m-95m=4.75m\) over Karen in \(99.75m\), hence Jane is gaining \(1m\) over Karen in every \(\frac{99.75}{4.75}=21m\).

Hence, Jane in order to gain remaining \(0.25m\) over Karen should cover \(21*0.25=5.25m\).

Re: Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Aug 2013, 19:27

1

This post received KUDOS

1. The initial gap between Jane and Karen was 5m. It was reduced to 0.25 m as Jane covers 99.75 m. Jane gains 4.75m. 2. So the gap of 0.25m would be reduced to 0 or Jane would gain 0.25m, if Jane further covers (99.75/4.75) * 0.25 = 5.25 m. _________________

Re: Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Aug 2013, 10:10

Jane gave Karen a 5 m head start in a 100 race and Jane was beaten by 0.25m. In how many meters more would Jane have overtaken Karen?

I think my problem is understanding that Jane and Karen started the race at the same time and Karen started from 5m ahead of Jane. If Jane and Karen started from the same spot and Jane only started running after Karen was 5m in front of her in which case Karen would have run for more time than Jane. How do I know to assume this for future problems?

If Jane and Karen start running at the same time with Karen starting 5m in front of Jane, and Karen beats Jane by .25m then over the same course of time Jane covers 99.75 m and gains 4.75m on Karen. I guess you have to assume that both instantaneously stop as soon as Karen hit's the finish line.

The problem asks about the distance Jane would have to run in addition to the 99.75m she did to overtake Karen. In other words, her rate is greater than Karen's and we have to find how many meters it takes for her to gain an additional .25m on Karen. If Jane gained 4.75m on Karen over 99.75m then Jane gains 99.75/4.75 = 1m on Karen every 21 meters she runs. If Jane gains 1m for every 21m she runs and we need to find how many meters she gains to cover just 1/4th of the distance (1/4th of 1m): 21/4 = 5.25.

Jane will pass Karen after another 5.25m of the race.

Given that Jane and Karen run at the same rates and that Karen is in front of Jane when the race starts we know that Jane has to be running at a faster rate than Karen. We can figure out how many meters Jane gained on Karen over the course of the race. If we know that Jane gains a certain amount on Karen over a fixed distance we can figure out how many more meters she needs to run to achieve a certain goal (i.e. passing Karen)

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

HBS alum talks about effective altruism and founding and ultimately closing MBAs Across America at TED: Casey Gerald speaks at TED2016 – Dream, February 15-19, 2016, Vancouver Convention Center...

By Libby Koerbel Engaging a room of more than 100 people for two straight hours is no easy task, but the Women’s Business Association (WBA), Professor Victoria Medvec...