Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 06:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 477
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe [#permalink] New post 07 Feb 2010, 15:31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

32% (02:14) correct 68% (01:23) wrong based on 22 sessions
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct.
Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?


1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.

2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.

3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.

4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.

5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 210
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 1

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 07 Feb 2010, 20:03
Sandra's point is that the people only eat the fish found there and there is no other way the people will survive. To counter this, if we can say that the people do eat something else if necesary will weaken sandras claim.

D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Schools: Cambridge
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 14

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2010, 07:06
Well, IMO the answer is E.
E attacks the Sanda's basic premise that the fishing is done by local and if disallowed, it will deprive people their staple food.
_________________

No Execuse..

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 298
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2010, 07:14
vscid wrote:
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct.
Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?


1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.

2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.

3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.

4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.

5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.


E for me.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 196
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 1

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2010, 11:48
Argument talks about NOT CURTAILING FISHING stating that FISH IS SOURCE OF FOOD WHICH ,IF DENIED,MIGHT LEAD TO HUMAN STARVATION

However,if it can be shown that FISHING IS BEING DONE MUCH BEYOND THOSE TO MAINTAIN HHUMAN SURVIVAL LEVELS,it can be used to justfy the curtailing of
FISHING....
only E could be used to counter that SINCE WE ARE ALREADY OVERFISHING..SO MUCH BEYOND THE SURVIVAL LIMITS OVER TO COMMERCIAL EXPORTS...we should
curtail fishing.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 459
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 5

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2010, 07:29
+ 1 E

Clearly attacks the Sanda's basic premise

OA please?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 250
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 16

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2010, 07:21
yeah ...E
The counterargument is based on local consumption. E negates that view.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 230
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2010, 01:59
I would like to know what is wrong with D?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 6

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 12:57
E for me.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 1

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2010, 00:53
Not D because D negates the premise given by Sandra " The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. "

Wheras E restects Sandra claim, concidering what she is saying is true and at the same time bring up another claim ( export of fish) to proce her point.

So E
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 3

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2010, 01:13
rathoreaditya81 wrote:
Well, IMO the answer is E.
E attacks the Sanda's basic premise that the fishing is done by local and if disallowed, it will deprive people their staple food.


E my pick
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 232
Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 5

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2010, 02:24
IMO answer is E
_________________

Cheers,
Varun


If you like my post, give me KUDOS!!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 120
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 169

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2011, 06:45
+1 for E.

OA please!
_________________

I will greatly appreciate your KUDOS my friends!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 18

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2011, 07:40
vscid wrote:
Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe fishing beds off the coast of Ecuador. Unless the overfishing is curtailed, several local species of fish may become extinct.
Sandra: The people who live on the Ecuadoran coast depend on the fish for their survival. To deprive them of this source of food might mean death by starvation.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from Jeanette’s point of view to counter Sandra’s point?


1] There are species of fish in other locations that are quite similar to the fish found in the Guantabe fishing beds.

2] Allowing particular species to breed unchecked can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the entire area.

3] A steady diet of fish can raise the level of PCBs (known carcinogens) in the body of a human to dangerous levels.

4] In a study, it was found that the coastal Ecuadorians would willingly eat other foods when they were available.

5] The vast majority of the fish now taken from the Guantabe fishing beds is taken by commercial fishing ships that sell their catch in other countries.


This question's reasoning is quite simple.
Jan: we should stop fishing
san: but it's the most important food.
So for Jan to counter San viewpoint, she must indicate that the majority of the caught fish is not for food => Choice E
_________________

Hung M.Tran
Faculty of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University of Vietnam


Follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/AndyTranHung

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 75
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 2

Re: Guantabe [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2011, 13:26
+1 E.
Sandra - No fishing = starvation.
To make Sandra's point wrong we need to prove that the people in Ecuador could survive without fishing. Only E does that.
Re: Guantabe   [#permalink] 17 Jan 2011, 13:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Jeanette Rankin yerra3317 3 04 Jan 2014, 03:58
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic When do we stop pluggin in? Sachin9 6 03 Nov 2012, 07:15
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people AK47 8 22 Jan 2007, 04:53
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people sangarelli 20 05 Sep 2006, 06:34
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people nakib77 7 27 Nov 2005, 10:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Jeanette: We must stop the overfishing of the Guantabe

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.