Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 00:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2006, 19:11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson's poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson's own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson's often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.


Which of the following best summarizes the author's main point?


(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson's early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson's use of the dash in his text of Dickinson's poetry misleads readers about the poet's intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson's attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson's poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson's editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson's handwritten manuscripts.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2006, 19:15
Was between A and E.

A is wrong because it presumes that Jhonson's mistakes are equally serious. Argument does nt say that. It says "still guilty".
Hence E.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - Johnson [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2006, 19:23
KC wrote:
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson's poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson's own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson's often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.


Which of the following best summarizes the author's main point?


(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson's early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson's use of the dash in his text of Dickinson's poetry misleads readers about the poet's intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson's attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson's poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson's editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson's handwritten manuscripts.


The choice is between A and E.
Nowhere does the author imply that Johnson's faults are equally serious. Infact, he contends that Johnson has done a better job - blue highlight

"Indecipherable" (Red highlight) - suggests E is the better choice.

I say it is E
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 122
Location: Florida, Argentina, UK
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Johnson [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2006, 19:36
My vote was for E.
However, the keys in this discussion are "distorted her intentions. still guilty of its own forms of distortion. to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. she apparently never made any definitive choice at all." Therefore, B seems to be the only logical conclusion that derives from this evidence.
B. Tricky !!! OA please???

Last edited by brufarber on 18 Oct 2006, 06:13, edited 2 times in total.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 00:24
go for A
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Location: NYC
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 11:13
A seems right at first blush, but agree w/ previous posts on why it is not.

going with E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 343
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 11:46
it is E
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 532
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2006, 13:12
Chose E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2006, 15:17
E it is -

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson's early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions. <Author never said Johnson is right>
(B) Johnson's use of the dash in his text of Dickinson's poetry misleads readers about the poet's intentions. <out of scope>
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. <use of 'must' too strong>
(D) Although Johnson's attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson's poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. <out of scope>
(E) Dickinson's editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson's handwritten manuscripts.<correct>
  [#permalink] 19 Oct 2006, 15:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early papillon86 9 07 Dec 2009, 00:48
Experts publish their posts in the topic Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early goalsnr 6 15 Mar 2008, 07:26
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early joemama142000 5 29 Oct 2005, 20:29
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early ywilfred 11 31 Aug 2005, 08:15
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early aditi saini 1 17 Jul 2005, 20:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.