Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 19:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2008, 01:58
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 889
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 33

Re: CR Question [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2008, 04:54
Vemuri wrote:
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.

he never talked about them being equally serious

(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.

Intentions are not mislead. Only the punctuations are incorrect.

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.

Nothing about Dickinson wanted or not is mentioned.

(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.

material has thoroughness or not is not discussed, except for punctuation. Rather he was more thorough than previous editors

(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.



"E" is your answer.
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3572
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 367

Kudos [?]: 1851 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR Question [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2008, 07:04
Expert's post
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

Main idea: Johnson is right when criticizes early editors. Johnson's own is also bad. The distortion problem issues from Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation.


Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions. - ok. the best summary.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions. - irrelevant. Nothing about other editors
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. - irrelevant. Nothing about Johnson
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. - irrelevant. Problem is not a lack of sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.- irrelevant. Nothing about Johnson' criticism.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 629
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 1

Re: CR Question [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2008, 07:53
Hard question, I'm going with E.
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3572
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 367

Kudos [?]: 1851 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR Question [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2008, 08:01
Expert's post
Yeah, you are right. "E" seems to be better than A....
"A" tell us nothing about the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Re: CR Question   [#permalink] 24 Jan 2008, 08:01
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early papillon86 9 07 Dec 2009, 00:48
Experts publish their posts in the topic Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early goalsnr 6 15 Mar 2008, 07:26
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early joemama142000 5 29 Oct 2005, 20:29
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early ywilfred 11 31 Aug 2005, 08:15
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early aditi saini 1 17 Jul 2005, 20:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.