Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 21:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Jones: Prehistoric wooden tools found in South America have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Jones: Prehistoric wooden tools found in South America have [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 09:24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Jones: Prehistoric wooden tools found in South America have been dated to 13,000 years ago. Although scientists attribute these tools to peoples whose ancestors first crossed into the Americas from Siberia to Alaska, this cannot be correct. In order to have reached a site so far south, these peoples must have been migrating southward well before 13,000 years ago. However, no such tools dating to before 13,000 years ago have been found anywhere between Alaska and South America.
Smith: Your evidence is inconclusive. Those tools were found in peat bogs, which are rare in the Americas. Wooden tools in soils other than peat bogs usually decompose within only a few years.

The point at issue between Jones and Smith is

(A) whether all prehistoric tools that are 13,000 years or older were made of wood
(B) whether the scientists’ attribution of tools could be correct in light of Jones’s evidence
(C) whether the dating of the wooden tools by the scientists could be correct
(D) how long ago the peoples who crossed into the American from Siberia to Alaska first did so
(E) whether Smith’s evidence entails that the wooden tools have been dated correctly

Please give reasons for ur choices...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 275
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 13:00
Here's my opinion on this:

A) whether all prehistoric tools that are 13,000 years or older were made of wood - nop. All tools is too strong.
(B) whether the scientists’ attribution of tools could be correct in light of Jones’s evidence - it's only one side of the debate. Nop.
(C) whether the dating of the wooden tools by the scientists could be correct - My pick of the 5. Jones is saying the scientists are wrong. Smith argues that the scientists could be right.
(D) how long ago the peoples who crossed into the American from Siberia to Alaska first did so - not relevant.
(E) whether Smith’s evidence entails that the wooden tools have been dated correctly - same as B, only one side of the story.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 16:43
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1024
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 18:11
I agree with D. What is the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 19:28
The argument is about tools

So left with B and C

Smith is actually talking evidence provided by Jones

B it is
_________________

AimHigher

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1443
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 20:34
im with B as well , the debate is whether or not the tools are an accurate measure of migration
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 89
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 21:52
my pick is D. Whats the OA ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 21:55
I will go with C ... Jones arguing that dating of tools dine by scientists could be wrong...Smith says that Jones evidence is inclusive...
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 754
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2007, 22:00
B !
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2007, 07:37
The OA is B indeed.
  [#permalink] 19 Mar 2007, 07:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Jones: Prehistoric wooden tools found in South America have vineetgupta 1 16 Mar 2007, 09:38
Questions 17-18 Jones: Prehistoric wooden tools found in jyotsnasarabu 11 29 Nov 2006, 08:27
Found throughout Central and South America, sloths hang from iced_tea 11 04 Jun 2006, 08:57
Found throughout Central and South America, sloths hang from Antmavel 13 28 Sep 2005, 22:50
Found throughout Central and South America, the sloth hangs riteshgupta1 2 06 Jul 2005, 13:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Jones: Prehistoric wooden tools found in South America have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.