Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 10:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Location: Hungary
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 3

Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 20:01
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Joshua Smith’s new novel was criticized by the book editor for The Daily Standard as implausible. That criticism, like so many other criticisms from the same source in the past, is completely unwarranted, as anyone who has actually read the novel would agree. Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.
Which one of the following is the most serious error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) It relies on the assumption that a criticism can legitimately by dismissed as unwarranted if it is offended by someone who had previously displayed questionable judgment.
(B) It ignores the fact that people can agree about something even though what they agree about is not the case.
(C) It calls into question the intellectual integrity of the critic in order to avoid having to address the grounds on which the criticism is based.
(D) It takes for granted that a whole story will have a given characteristics if each of its parts has that characteristics.
(E) It attempts to justify its conclusion by citing reasons that most people would find plausible only if they were already convinced that the conclusion was true.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 08:47
zoltan wrote:
Joshua Smith’s new novel was criticized by the book editor for The Daily Standard as implausible. That criticism, like so many other criticisms from the same source in the past, is completely unwarranted, as anyone who has actually read the novel would agree. Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.
Which one of the following is the most serious error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) It relies on the assumption that a criticism can legitimately by dismissed as unwarranted if it is offended by someone who had previously displayed questionable judgment.
(B) It ignores the fact that people can agree about something even though what they agree about is not the case.
(C) It calls into question the intellectual integrity of the critic in order to avoid having to address the grounds on which the criticism is based.
(D) It takes for granted that a whole story will have a given characteristics if each of its parts has that characteristics.
(E) It attempts to justify its conclusion by citing reasons that most people would find plausible only if they were already convinced that the conclusion was true.

Between A and B, my pick A.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 178
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 10:11
i'll go for D
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2007, 12:25
12345678 wrote:
i'll go for D

Yup same for me...
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 200
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2007, 17:35
D as well. Don't have the best reason though as I arrived at D thru POE...
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Location: Hungary
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2007, 05:31
D is correct!!
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2007, 08:11
Even if each of the incidents in the novel is plausible, it does not mean that the entire novel as a whole is plausible. This is the weakness pointed out in option D and hence the answer.
Re: LSAT_CR   [#permalink] 02 Oct 2007, 08:11
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Joshua Smith's new novel was criticized by 5 28 Mar 2015, 10:56
5 Critic: A novel cannot be of the highest quality unless most 5 29 Dec 2013, 09:42
1 Critical reasoning-book 3 02 Apr 2010, 04:22
Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor 4 01 Mar 2010, 10:52
those of you that have used manhattan's book on critical 2 28 Oct 2007, 15:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by