Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 07:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 319
Location: Hungary
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2007, 20:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Joshua Smith’s new novel was criticized by the book editor for The Daily Standard as implausible. That criticism, like so many other criticisms from the same source in the past, is completely unwarranted, as anyone who has actually read the novel would agree. Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.
Which one of the following is the most serious error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) It relies on the assumption that a criticism can legitimately by dismissed as unwarranted if it is offended by someone who had previously displayed questionable judgment.
(B) It ignores the fact that people can agree about something even though what they agree about is not the case.
(C) It calls into question the intellectual integrity of the critic in order to avoid having to address the grounds on which the criticism is based.
(D) It takes for granted that a whole story will have a given characteristics if each of its parts has that characteristics.
(E) It attempts to justify its conclusion by citing reasons that most people would find plausible only if they were already convinced that the conclusion was true.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: LSAT_CR [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2007, 08:47
zoltan wrote:
Joshua Smith’s new novel was criticized by the book editor for The Daily Standard as implausible. That criticism, like so many other criticisms from the same source in the past, is completely unwarranted, as anyone who has actually read the novel would agree. Each one of the incidents in which Smith’s hero gets involved is the kind of incident that could very well have happened to someone or other.
Which one of the following is the most serious error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) It relies on the assumption that a criticism can legitimately by dismissed as unwarranted if it is offended by someone who had previously displayed questionable judgment.
(B) It ignores the fact that people can agree about something even though what they agree about is not the case.
(C) It calls into question the intellectual integrity of the critic in order to avoid having to address the grounds on which the criticism is based.
(D) It takes for granted that a whole story will have a given characteristics if each of its parts has that characteristics.
(E) It attempts to justify its conclusion by citing reasons that most people would find plausible only if they were already convinced that the conclusion was true.


Between A and B, my pick A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 178
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2007, 10:11
i'll go for D
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2007, 12:25
12345678 wrote:
i'll go for D


Yup same for me...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 199
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2007, 17:35
D as well. Don't have the best reason though as I arrived at D thru POE...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 319
Location: Hungary
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

[#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2007, 05:31
D is correct!!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: LSAT_CR [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2007, 08:11
Even if each of the incidents in the novel is plausible, it does not mean that the entire novel as a whole is plausible. This is the weakness pointed out in option D and hence the answer.
Re: LSAT_CR   [#permalink] 02 Oct 2007, 08:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Critic: A novel cannot be of the highest quality unless most gmat6nplus1 3 29 Dec 2013, 09:42
Experts publish their posts in the topic 35 percent of the books in Richard’'s collection are novels metallicafan 4 22 Aug 2012, 18:52
Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor vaivish1723 4 01 Mar 2010, 10:52
That the new managing editor rose from the publications soft banerjeea_98 17 06 May 2005, 07:16
Joshua Smith's new novel was criticized by the book editor harshi 7 11 Apr 2005, 18:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Joshua Smith s new novel was criticized by the book editor

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.