Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Sep 2016, 20:51
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 195
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 7

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 12:12
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (01:42) correct 16% (00:30) wrong based on 77 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.
(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Only GMAT!!
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
Posts: 74
WE 1: 5.5+ years IT Prof.
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 24

Re: SC Question : Judicial rules [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 12:57
first of all require should follow with "that"...so we are left with A,B and C

C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
Should know.....a rebuttal of .... are awkward and not concise...

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut

(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut

Between A and B.... its a subjunctive construction...Judicial rules in many states require that... so "be" makes sense and also so that is idiomatically correct. Hence, B is the best answer.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 167
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 18

Re: SC Question : Judicial rules [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 15:32
Answer B

attempt should be followed by to..so C and D are out
"that" should follow require so E is out

witnesses be made known is better than witnesses are made known - A OUT
_________________

My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own.

If you like my explanations award kudos.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 167
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 18

Re: SC Question : Judicial rules [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 15:34
and yes...."so that they" is correct and not "so they"
_________________

My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own.

If you like my explanations award kudos.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 282
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Other)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 23

Reviews Badge
Re: SC Question : Judicial rules [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2011, 09:21
anordinaryguy wrote:
Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut


That/to is needed- so left with A(2 things- be verb and "that" is missing),B,C (should is a red flag in it- rules are just mandatory !)
_________________

My GMAT Journey 540->680->730!


~ When the going gets tough, the Tough gets going!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Posts: 60
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 6

Re: SC Question : Judicial rules [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2011, 11:55
00:27, subjunctive. Only one option uses the infinitive
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9776
Followers: 838

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2015, 14:48
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of   [#permalink] 25 Aug 2015, 14:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic The United States has relaxed overseas borrowing rules Lucky2783 12 26 Feb 2015, 03:35
7 Local state regulations require that a company arindamsur 3 09 May 2014, 02:19
Here is a kind of rule, may be halp to many..... In the arorag 0 30 Sep 2008, 20:11
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of walker 4 29 Dec 2007, 23:41
According to a ruling by the state Supreme Court, the owner jyotsnasarabu 7 01 Dec 2006, 12:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.